William Engdahl: The biofuel / food crisis

2007-07-25

Richard Moore

        Last year, as bio-ethanol production first became a
        major market factor, corn prices rose by some 130% on
        the Chicago in 14 months....As a result of the
        diversion of record acreages of US and Brazilian corn
        and soybeans to bio-fuel production, food reserves
        are literally disappearing. Global food security,
        according to FAO data, is at its lowest since 1972.

         In the mid-1970's Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a
         protégé of the Rockefeller family and of its institutions
         stated, "Control the oil and you control entire nations;
         control the food and you control the people." The same cast
         of characters who brought the world the Iraq war, the global
         scramble to control oil, who brought us patented genetically
         manipulated seeds and now Terminator suicide seeds, and who
         cry about the "problem of world over-population," are now
         backing conversion of global grain production to burn as
         fuel at a time of declining global grain reserves. That
         alone should give pause for thought. As the popular saying
         goes, "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't
         out to get you."

____________________

'Buy Feed Corn: They're about to stop making itŠ'
©  F. William Engdahl *   July 21 2007

That bowl of Kellogg's Cornflakes on the 
breakfast table, or the portion of pasta or corn 
tortillas, cheese or meat on the table is going 
to rise in price over the coming months as sure 
as the sun rises in the East. Welcome ladies and 
gentlemen to the new world food price shock, 
conveniently timed to accompany our current world 
oil price shock.

Curiously it's ominously similar in many respects 
to the early 1970's when prices for oil and food 
both exploded by several hundred percent in a 
matter of months. That mid-1970's price explosion 
led President Nixon to ask his old pal, Arthur 
Burns, then Chairman of the Fed, to find a way to 
alter the CPI inflation data to take attention 
away from the rising prices. The result then was 
the now-commonplace publication of the absurd 
"core inflation" CPI numbers--sans oil and food. 
Stephen Roche was the young Fed economist who was 
assigned the statistical manipulation job by 
Burns.

The late American satirist, Mark Twain once 
quipped, "Buy land: They've stopped making itŠ" 
Today we can say almost the same about corn or 
all grains worldwide. The world is in the early 
months of the greatest sustained rise in grain 
prices, for all major grains including maize, 
wheat, rice that we have seen in three decades. 
Those three crops constitute almost 90% of all 
grains cultivated in the world.

Washington's calculated, absurd plan

What's driving this extraordinary change? Here 
things get pretty interesting. The Bush 
Administration is making a major public relations 
push to convince the world it has turned into a 
"better steward of the environment." The problem 
is that many have fallen for the hype.

The center of his program, announced in his 
January State of the Union Address is called '20 
in 10', cutting US gasoline use 20% by 2010. The 
official reason is to "reduce dependency on 
imported oil," as well as cutting unwanted 
"greenhouse gas" emissions. That isn't the case, 
but it makes good PR. Repeat it often enough and 
maybe most people will believe it. Maybe they 
won't realize their taxpayer subsidies to grow 
ethanol corn instead of feed corn are also 
driving the price of their daily bread through 
the roof.

The heart of the plan is a huge, taxpayer 
subsidized expansion of use of bio-ethanol for 
transport fuel. The President's plan requires 
production of 35 billion gallons (about 133 
billion liters) of ethanol a year by 2017. 
Congress already mandated with the Energy Policy 
Act of 2005 that corn ethanol for fuel must rise 
from 4 billion gallons in 2006 to 7.5 billion in 
2012. To make certain it will happen, farmers and 
big agribusiness giants like ADM or David 
Rockefeller get generous taxpayer subsidies to 
grow corn for fuel instead of food. Currently 
ethanol producers get a subsidy in the US of 51 
cents per gallon ethanol paid to the blender, 
usually an oil company that blends it with 
gasoline for sale.

As a result of the beautiful US Government 
subsidies to produce bio-ethanol fuels, and the 
new legislative mandate, the US refinery industry 
is investing big time in building new special 
ethanol distilleries, similar to oil refineries, 
except they produce ethanol fuel. The number 
currently under construction exceeds the total 
number of oil refineries built in the US over the 
past 25 years. When finished in the next 2-3 
years the demand for corn and other grain to make 
ethanol for car fuel will double from present 
levels.

Not just USA bio-ethanol. In March Bush met with 
Brazil's President to sign a bilateral "Ethanol 
Pact" to cooperate in R&D of "next generation" 
bio-fuel technologies like cellulosic ethanol 
from wood, and joint cooperation in "stimulating" 
expansion of bio-fuels use in developing 
countries, especially in Central America, and 
creating a "bio-fuels OPEC-like" cartel market 
with rules that allows formation of a Western 
Hemisphere ethanol market.

In short, the use of farmland worldwide for 
bio-ethanol and other bio-fuels-burning the food 
product rather than using it for human or animal 
food-is being treated in Washington, Brazil and 
other major centers, including the EU, as a major 
new growth industry.

Phony green arguments

Bio-fuel-gasoline or fuel produced from refining 
food products-is being hyped as a solution to the 
controversial Global Warming problem. Leaving 
aside the faked science and the political 
interests behind the sudden hype about dangers of 
global warming, bio-fuels offer no net positive 
benefits over oil even under best conditions. Its 
advocates claim that present first generation 
bio-fuels "save up to 60% of carbon emission." As 
well, amid rising oil prices at $75 per barrel 
for Brent marker grades, governments such as 
Brazil's are frantic to substitute homegrown 
bio-fuels for imported gasoline. In Brazil today 
70% of all cars have "flexi-fuel" engines able to 
switch from conventional gasoline to 100% 
bio-fuel or any mix. Bio-fuel production has 
become one of Brazil's major export industries as 
well.

The green claims for bio-fuel as a friendly and 
better fuel than gasoline are at best dubious, if 
not outright fraudulent. Depending on who runs 
the tests, ethanol has little if any effect on 
exhaust-pipe emissions in current car models. It 
has significant emission, however, of some toxins 
including formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, a 
suspected neurotoxin which has been banned as 
carcinogenic in California.

Ethanol is not some benign substance as we are 
led to think from the industry propaganda. It is 
highly corrosive to pipelines as well as to seals 
and fuel systems of existing car or other 
gasoline engines. It requires special new gas 
pumps. All that conversion costs money.

But the killer-diller about ethanol is that it 
holds at least 30% less energy per gallon than 
normal gasoline, translating into a loss in fuel 
economy per gallon of at least 25% over gasoline 
for an Ethanol E-85% blend. No advocate of the 
ethanol boondoggle addresses the huge social cost 
which is beginning to hit the dining room tables 
across the US, Europe and the rest of the world. 
Food prices are exploding as corn, soybeans and 
all cereal grain prices are going through the 
roof because of the 
astronomical-Congress-driven-demand for corn to 
burn for bio-fuel.

This year the Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology issued a report concluding that using 
corn-based ethanol instead of gasoline will have 
no impact on greenhouse gas emissions, and would 
even expand fossil fuel use due to increased 
demand for fertilizer and irrigation to expand 
acreage of ethanol crops. And according to MIT 
"natural gas consumption is 66% of total corn 
ethanol production energy," meaning huge new 
strains on natural gas supply, pushing prices 
there higher.

The idea that the world can "grow" out of oil 
dependency with bio-fuels is the PR hype being 
used to sell what is shaping up to be the mist 
dangerous threat to the planet's food supply 
since creation of patented genetically 
manipulated corn and crops.

US farms become bio-fuel factories

The main reason US and world grain prices are 
soaring in the past two years and now 
pre-programmed to continue rising at a major 
pace, is the conversion of US farmland to become 
de facto bio-fuel factories. In 2006 US farmland 
devoted to bio-fuel crops increased by 48%. None 
of that land was replaced for food crop 
cultivation. The tax subsidies make it far too 
profitable to produce ethanol fuel.

Since 2001 the amount of maize used to produce 
bio-ethanol in the USA has risen 300%, trend 
increasing going forward. In fact, in 2006 US 
maize or corn crops for bio-fuel equaled the 
tonnage of corn used for export. In 2007 it is 
estimated it will exceed the corn for export by a 
hefty amount. The US is the world's leading corn 
exporter, most going for animal feed to EU and 
other countries. The traditional USDA statistics 
on acreage planted to corn is no longer a useful 
metric of food prices as all marginal acreage is 
going for bio-fuel growing. The amount available 
for animal and human feed is actually declining.

Brazil and China are similarly switching from 
food to bio-fuels with large swatches of land.

A result of the bio-fuel revolution in 
agriculture is that world carryover or reserve 
stocks of grains have been plunging for six of 
the past seven years. Carryover reserve stocks of 
all grains fell at the end of 2006 to 57 days of 
consumption, the lowest level since 1972. Little 
wonder that world grain prices rose 100% over the 
past 12 months. This is just the start.

That decline in grain reserves, the measure of 
food security in event of drought or harvest 
failure-an increasingly common event in recent 
years-is pre-programmed to continue going as far 
ahead as the eye can see. Assuming modest world 
population increase annually of some 70 million 
people over the coming decade, especially in the 
Indian subcontinent and Africa, the stagnation or 
even decline in the tonnages of feed corn or 
other feed grains including rice that is 
harvested annually as growing amounts of 
bio-ethanol and other bio-fuels displaces food 
grain, in fact means we are just getting started 
on the greatest transformation of global 
agriculture since the introduction of the 
agribusiness revolution with fertilizers and 
mechanized farming after World War II. The 
difference is that this revolution is at the 
expense of food production. That preprograms 
exploding global grain prices, increased poverty 
and malnutrition. And the effect on gasoline 
import demand will be minimal.

Prof. M.A. Altieri of Berkeley University 
estimates that dedicating all USA corn and 
soybean production acreage to bio-fuels would 
only meet 12% of gasoline and 6% of diesel needs. 
He notes that though one-fifth of last year's 
corn harvest went to bio-ethanol, it met a mere 
3% of energy needs. But the farmland is 
converting at a record pace. In 2006 more than 
50% of Iowa and South Dakota corn went to ethanol 
refineries. Farmers across the Midwest, desperate 
for more income after years of depressed corn 
prices, are abandoning traditional crop rotation 
to grow exclusively soybeans or corn with 
dramatic added impact on soil erosion and needs 
for added chemical pesticides. In the US some 41% 
of all herbicides used are already applied to 
corn. Monsanto and other makers of glyphosate 
herbicides like Roundup are clearly smiling on 
the way to the bank.

Going global with bio-fuels

The Bush-Lula pact is just the start of a growing 
global rush to plant crops for bio-fuel. Huge 
sugarcane, palm oil and soy plantations for 
bio-fuel refining are taking over forests and 
grasslands in Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, 
Ecuador and Paraguay. Soy cultivation has already 
caused the deforestation of 21 million hectares 
in Brazil and 14 million ha in Argentina, with no 
end in sight, as world grain prices continue to 
rise. Soya is used for bio-diesel fuel.

China, desperate for energy sources, is a major 
player in bio-fuel cultivation, reducing food 
crop acreage there as well. In the EU most 
bio-diesel fuel is produced using rapeseed 
plants, a popular animal feed. The result? Meat 
prices around the globe are rising and set to 
continue rising as far ahead as the eye can see. 
The EU has a target requiring minimum bio-fuel 
content of 10%, a foolish demand that will set 
aside 18% of EU farmland to cultivate crops to be 
burned as bio-fuel.

Big oil is also driving the bio-fuels bandwagon. 
Prof. David Pimentel of Cornell University and 
other scientists claim that net energy output 
from bio-ethanol fuel is less than the fossil 
fuel energy used to produce the ethanol. 
Measuring all energy inputs to produce ethanol 
from production of nitrogen fertilizer to energy 
needed to clean the considerable waste from 
bio-fuel refineries, Pimintel's research showed a 
net energy loss of 22% for bio-fuel-they use more 
energy than they produce. That translates into 
little threat to oil demand and huge profit for 
clever oil giants that re-profile themselves as 
"green energy" producers.

So it's little wonder that ExxonMobil, Chevron 
and BP are all into bio-fuels. This past May, BP 
announced the largest ever R&D grant to a 
university, $500 million to the University of 
California-Berkeley to fund BP-dictated R&D into 
alternative energy including bio-fuels. 
Stanford's Global Climate and Energy Program got 
$100 million from ExxonMobil; University of 
California-Davis got $25 million from Chevron for 
its Bio-energy Research Group. Princeton 
University's Carbon Mitigation Initiative takes 
$15 million from BP.

Lord Browne, the disgraced former CEO of BP 
declared in 2006, "The world needs new 
technologies to maintain adequate supplies of 
energy for the future. We believe bioscience can 
bring immense benefits to the energy sector." The 
bio-fuel market is booming like few others today. 
This all is a paradise for global agribusiness 
industrial companies like Cargill, ADM and 
Monsanto, Syngenta.

All this, combined with severe weather problems 
in China, Australia, Ukraine and large parts of 
the EU growing areas this harvest season, 
guarantee that grain prices are set to explode 
further in coming months and years. Some are 
gleefully reporting the end of the era of "cheap 
food." With disappearing food security reserves 
and disappearing acreage going to plant corn and 
grains for food, the bio-fuel transformation will 
impact global food prices massively in coming 
years.

Another agenda behind Ethanol?

Uh Huh. The dramatic embrace of bio-fuels by the 
Bush Administration since 2005 has clearly been 
the global driver for soaring grain and food 
prices in the past 18 months. The evidence 
suggests this is no accident of sloppy 
legislative preparation. The US Government has 
been researching and developing bio-fuels since 
the 1970's. The bio-ethanol architects did their 
homework we can be assured. It's increasingly 
clear that the same people who brought us oil 
price inflation are now deliberately creating 
parallel food price inflation. We have had a rise 
in average oil prices of some 300% since the end 
of 2000 when George W. Bush and Dick Halliburton 
Cheney made oil the central preoccupation of US 
foreign policy.

Last year, as bio-ethanol production first became 
a major market factor, corn prices rose by some 
130% on the Chicago in 14 months. It was more 
than known when Congress and the Bush 
Administration made their heavy push for 
bio-ethanol in 2005 that world grain reserves had 
been declining at alarming levels for several 
years at a time when global demand, driven 
especially by growing wealth And increasing meat 
consumption in China, was rising.

As a result of the diversion of record acreages 
of US and Brazilian corn and soybeans to bio-fuel 
production, food reserves are literally 
disappearing. Global food security, according to 
FAO data, is at its lowest since 1972. Curiously 
that was just the time that Henry Kissinger and 
the Nixon Administration engineered, in cahoots 
with Cargill and ADM-the major backers of the 
ethanol scam today-what was called The Great 
Grain Robbery, sale of huge volumes of US grain 
to the Soviet Union in exchange for sales of 
record volumes of Russian oil to the West. Both 
oil and corn prices rose by 1975 some 300-400% as 
a result. Just how that worked, I treated in 
detail in A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil 
Politics.

Today a new element has replaced USSR grain 
demand and harvest shortfalls. Bio-fuel demand, 
fed by US government subsidies is literally 
linking food prices to oil prices. The scale of 
the subsidized bio-fuel consumption has exploded 
so dramatically since the beginning of 2006 when 
the US Energy Policy Act of 2005 first began to 
impact crop planting decisions, not only in the 
USA, that there is emerging a de facto 
competition between people and cars for the same 
grains. Lester Brown recently noted, "We're 
looking at competition in the global market 
between 800 million automobiles and the world's 
two billion poorest people for the same 
commodity, the same grains. We are now in a new 
economic era where oil and food are 
interchangeable commodities because we can 
convert grain, sugar cane, soybeans-anything-into 
fuel for cars. In effect the price of oil is 
beginning to set the price of food."

In the mid-1970's Secretary of State Henry 
Kissinger, a protégé of the Rockefeller family 
and of its institutions stated, "Control the oil 
and you control entire nations; control the food 
and you control the people." The same cast of 
characters who brought the world the Iraq war, 
the global scramble to control oil, who brought 
us patented genetically manipulated seeds and now 
Terminator suicide seeds, and who cry about the 
"problem of world over-population," are now 
backing conversion of global grain production to 
burn as fuel at a time of declining global grain 
reserves. That alone should give pause for 
thought. As the popular saying goes, "Just 
because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't 
out to get you."

* F. William Engdahl is author of the book, Seeds 
of Deception: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic 
Manipulation, about to be released by Global 
Research Publishing, and author of A Century of 
War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New 
World Order, Pluto Press. He may be reached via 
his website, 
http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.

-- 

--------------------------------------------------------
Posting archives: http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/?lists=newslog
Escaping the Matrix website: http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website: http://cyberjournal.org

Community Democracy Framework:
http://cyberjournal.org/DemocracyFramework.html

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)