Massive Henge Discovered Near Hill of Tara


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Massive Henge Discovered Near Hill of Tara
Tuesday May 01, 2007 01:03
by TaraWatch - •••@••.•••
This site should be preserved - by law

A massive henge has been discovered in recent weeks near the Hill of Tara. This 
is a unique site in Ireland and should be preserved intact, as henges are very 
rare in Ireland. It is, without doubt, a national monument.

A number of images are available on

News of this discovery in Lismullin has been shrouded in secrecy. The entrance 
to the henge is facing Tara. It is not known if it is a wooden or stone henge.

For those of you unfamiliar with henges, here is the Wikipedia definition:

Henge -

A henge is a prehistoric architectural structure which consists of nearly 
circular or oval-shaped flat area over 20 metres (65 feet) in diameter that is 
enclosed and delimited by a boundary earthwork that usually comprises a ditch 
with an external bank. The earthwork permits access to the interior by one, two,
or four entrances. Internal components may include portal settings, timber 
circles, post rings, stone circles, four-stone settings, monoliths, standing 
posts, pits, coves, post alignments, stone alignments, burials, central mounds, 
and stakeholes (English Heritage definition).

Because of the defensive impracticalities of an enclosure with an external bank 
and an internal ditch (rather than vice versa), henges are considered to have 
served a ritual, rather than a defensive, purpose.


Efforts to provide a direct lineage for the henge from earlier enclosures have 
not been entirely conclusive; their chronological overlap with older structures 
making it difficult to see them as a coherent tradition. They seem to take the 
concept of creating a space separate from the outside world one step further 
than the causewayed enclosure and firmly focus attention on an internal point. 
In some cases, the construction of the bank and ditch was a stage that followed 
other activity on the site. Balfarg, North Mains and Cairnpapple earlier 
cremations and deliberate smashing of pottery predate the enclosure.

There are concentrations of henges over much of Britain. Orkney (Cunliffe 2001) 
and Wessex (Burl 1969) have both been suggested as the original provenance of 
the monument type. Neither seems likely (Barclay 2005). Unlike earlier enclosure
monuments, they were not usually built on hilltops but on low-lying ground, 
often close to watercourses and good agricultural land.

British enthusiasts, such as the editors of the Penguin Dictionary of 
Archaeology, claim that henges are unique to the British Isles and that similar,
much earlier, circles on the Continent, such as Goseck circle are not proper 

Another such enthusiast is Julian Cope whose book, The Megalithic European, 
proposes that the henge was a regional development from the Europe-wide 
causewayed enclosure, appearing following a cultural upheaval in around 3000 BC 
which inspired the peoples of Neolithic Europe to develop more independently. He
mentions the 'rondel enclosures' of Bavaria's Isar Valley which according to 
investigations by the German archaeologist RA Maier "drew comparisons with the 
henge monuments and causewayed enclosures of the British Isles". Although still 
with a multiply-causewayed ditch and entrances at cardinal points, the roundels 
are described by John Hodgson as not being positioned with defensive aims in 
mind and the largest, at Kothingeichendorf, appeared to be "midway between a 
henge and a causewayed enclosure".

Alasdair Whittle also views the development of the henge as a regional variation
within a European tradition that included a variety of ditched enclosures. He 
notes that henges and the grooved ware pottery often found at them are two 
examples of the British Neolithic not found on the Continent. Caroline Malone 
also states that henges did not occur in the rest of Western Europe but 
developed from a broader tradition of enclosure to become a phenomenon of the 
British Isles, a native tradition with sophisticated architecture and 
calendrical functions.


Henges may be classified as follows:

Class I henges have a single entrance created from a gap in the bank;

Class II henges have two entrances, diametrically opposite each other;

Class III henges which have four entrances, facing each other in pairs.

Sub groups exist for these when two or three internal ditches are present rather
than one. Henges are usually associated with the Late Neolithic, especially the 
grooved ware culture, the Peterborough culture and the beaker people. Sites such
as Stonehenge also provide evidence of activity from the later Bronze Age Wessex

Excavated henge ditch on Wyke Down (Dorset). The ditch was originally dug as a 
series of oval pits - the narrow chalk causeways separating the pits can be seen
in this photo.Henges often contain evidence of a variety of internal features 
including timber or stone circles, pits or burials. They should not be confused 
with the stone circles which are sometimes present within them. Similarly 
shaped, but larger enclosures are known as Henge enclosures whilst smaller ones 
with other types of enclosing features are known as Hengiform monuments.

The word henge is a backformation from Stonehenge, the famous monument in 
Wiltshire. Stonehenge is not a true henge at all as its ditch runs outside its 
bank, although there is a small extant external bank as well. This is a modern 
distinction however, we do not know if ditch placement would have been a 
significant feature or not to the people who built the monuments. The term was 
first coined in 1932 by Thomas Kendrick who later became the Keeper of British 
Antiquities at the British Museum.

Some of the finest and best-known henges include:

Avebury, about 20 miles (32 km) N. of Stonehenge on Salisbury Plain;
Durrington Walls near Woodhenge also on Salisbury Plain;
Knowlton Circles henge complex in Dorset;

Maumbury Rings in Dorset (later reused as a Roman amphitheatre and then a Civil 
War fort).

Mayborough in Cumbria
The Ring of Brodgar in Orkney;
Thornborough Henge complex in Yorkshire;
The Great Circle at Stanton Drew in Wiltshire.

Burials have been recorded at only a few henges, mostly as a result of secondary
reuse. At Avebury at least two very disturbed inhumations were found in the 
central area. At King Arthur's Round Table, Cumbria, a cremation trench lay 
within the monument, while at Woodhenge a central burial of a child was 
interpreted by its excavators as a dedicatory offering. Phosphate surveys at 
Maxey henge suggested that burials may also have been present within this 

Stone circles are also found within a few henges, with at least six cases 
identified in England. At Arbor Low in Derbyshire, the stones do not seem to 
have been set up to judge from the fact that no stoneholes have been found. 
Elsewhere, often only the stone holes remain.


Henges may have been used for rituals, or astronomical observation rather than 
being areas of day-to-day activity. The fact that their ditches are located 
inside their banks indicates that they would not have been used in a defensive 
function and that the barrier the earthworks provide is more likely to have been
symbolic rather than functional. Barclay, following arguments presented for 
Irish Iron Age enclosures, has suggested that they are 'defemsive' in the sense 
that the ditch and bank are facing something 'dangerous' inside the enclosure. 
He has also suggested that the considerable range of things surrounded by the 
earthworks, and the very long date range, is because henges were designed mainly
to enclose pre-existing ceremonial sites that were seen as 'ritually charged' 
and therefore dangerous to people. It has been conjectured that whatever took 
place inside the enclosures was intended to be separate from the outside world 
and perhaps only known to select individuals or groups.

The alignment of henges is a contentious issue. Popular belief is that their 
entrances point towards certain heavenly bodies. In fact, henge orientation is 
highly variable and may have been more determined by local topology rather than 
any desire for symbolic orientation. A slight tendency for Class I henges having
an entrance set in the north or north-east quarter has been identified following
statistical analysis whilst Class II henges generally have their axes aligned 
approximately south east to north west or north east to south west.

It has been suggested that the stone and timber structures sometimes built 
inside henges were used as solar declinometers, used to measure the position of 
the rising or setting sun. These structures by no means appear in all henges and
often considerably post-date the henges themselves. They therefore are not 
necessarily connected with the henge's original function. It has been 
conjectured that they could have been used to synchronize a calendar to the 
solar cycle for purposes of planting crops or timing religious rituals. Some 
henges have poles, stones or entrances that would indicate the position of the 
rising or setting sun during the equinoxes and solstices whilst others appear to
frame certain constellations. Additionally, many are placed so that nearby hills
either mark or do not interfere with such observations. Finally, some henges 
appear to be placed at particular latitudes. For example, a number are placed at
a latitude of 55 degrees north, where the same two markers can indicate the 
rising and setting sun for both the spring and autumn equinoxes. Henges are 
present from the extreme north to the extreme south of Britain however and so 
their latitude could not have been of great importance.

Formalisation is commonly attributed to henges; indications of the builders' 
concerns in controlling the arrival at, entrance to and movement within the 
enclosures. This was achieved through placing flanking stones or avenues at 
entrances of some henges or by dividing up the internal space using timber 
circles. While some were the first monuments to be built in their areas, others 
were added to already important landscapes, especially the larger examples.

The concentric nature of many of the internal features, such as the five rings 
of postholes at Balfarg or the six at Woodhenge, may in fact represent a finer 
distinction than the inside-out differences suggested by henge earthworks The 
ordering of space and suggestion of circular movement suggested by the sometimes
densely-packed internal features indicates a sophisticated degree of spatial 

Carhenge is either a modern parody or artistic tribute to the famous Stonehenge 

Related Link:

Escaping the Matrix website:  
cyberjournal website:             
Community Democracy Framework:
Subscribe cyberjournal list:            •••@••.•••  (send 
blank message)
Posting archives:                      
cyberjournal blog (join in):  
Moderator:                                         •••@••.•••  (comments