Global Research: It’s Time to End the “Last Taboo”


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

It's Time to End the "Last Taboo" and Hold Israel Accountable for Its Actions

By Stephen Lendman
July 11, 2006

The "Last Taboo" was the title of eminent Palestinian-born writer, scholar and 
activist Edward Said's essay written shortly before his death in September, 
2003. It was also the title of distinguished author and documentary filmmaker 
John Pilger's chapter about Palestine in his important new book Freedom Next 
Time that's reviewed and can be read at Said explained 
his title in what he wrote: "The extermination of the Native Americans can be 
admitted, the morality of Hiroshima attacked, the national flag (of the US) 
publicly committed to flames. But the systematic continuity of Israel's 52-year 
oppression and maltreatment of the Palestinians is virtually unmentionable, a 
narrative that has no permission to appear." It appeared boldly and courageously
in Pilger's book, and it's long past time for it be prominent in the mainstream 
as well to finally expose Israeli crimes and demand they end. It's especially 
important now as Israel just began an intensive military assault against the 
defenseless people of Gaza, which, before it ends, may result in many deaths, 
great destruction of property and an overwhelming humanitarian disaster even 
beyond the one already existing in The Occupied Territories.

Few people anywhere have suffered more or longer than the beleaguered 
Palestinians. For nearly four decades they've lived under a harsh and unending 
Israeli occupation of their land. They've endured a continued assault to seize 
it, a loss of their personal and economic rights and a denial of any chance for 
justice or their very humanity. These courageous people remain isolated in their
own land with little support from the outside. Yet it's never broken their 
spirit as they continue their heroic efforts to survive and struggle to gain 
their freedom.

The Israeli Assault on Gaza

This article documents events in besieged and now reoccupied Gaza since the 
Palestinians responded to continued Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) attacks 
against them by striking at an Israeli military post near Kerem Shalom crossing,
southeast of Rafah, on June 25 killing two IDF soldiers, injuring several others
and capturing a third. The Israeli response was swift and deadly but has not yet
been unleashed fully as the IDF decides when to enter Gaza full force to launch 
an assault against the defenseless people there already under seige. The 
Palestinian strike followed a series of bloody June Israeli attacks on Gaza 
including the widely reported beach shelling that killed 8 Palestinians and 
injured 32 others including 13 children. The Israelis admitted shelling the 
beach but denied responsibility for the deaths. They falsely claimed a 
Palestinian planted mine killed the civilians there despite the forensic 
evidence clearly proving otherwise. The corporate media reported the Israeli 
version of events but ignored the evidence refuting it preventing the public 
from knowing the truth. It also never reported that the so-called Israeli Gaza 
withdrawal of its 8,500 settlers in 21 settlements last August wasn't that at 
all. That staged media event was little more than the resettlement of Gaza's 
Jewish residents to new homes in Israel proper and the West Bank on other seized
Palestinian land. Furthermore, the IDF didn't withdraw. It merely redeployed 
away from the settlements it was guarding to new positions on the border. Gaza 
continued to be under de facto occupation and sealed off whenever the IDF 
wished, as it's now done, and along with the West Bank remains one of the 
world's two largest open air prisons.

The Palestinian June 25 raid was its response to continued IDF daily attacks 
against Gaza throughout June that killed about 30 people, injured many more and 
caused much destruction of property. Following the incident, the IDF launched 
"Operation Summer Rain" that included closing all border crossings, sealing off 
the territory to restrict movement in and out including humanitarian supplies 
such as food and medicine, and surrounding the territory awaiting orders to 
launch a major assault which it's now begun. The IDF has also stepped up its 
artillery shelling that has gone on continually for months. It's been firing 200
- 300 or more shells per day into northern Gaza, many close to civilian homes. 
It's also launched round the clock air attacks with F16 fighter jets and 
helicopter gunships firing air-to-surface missiles and dropping one-ton bombs on
civilian facilities; it's conducting mock air raids; and it's aircraft are 
breaking the sound barrier over Gaza at low altitudes deliberately inflicting 
eardrum shattering and terrifying sonic booms against the helpless people.

In addition, air strikes destroyed the three main bridges in the Gaza Valley 
cutting off the northern part of the Strip from its center and southern parts, 
preventing vital transportation from moving normally to provide essential needs 
to the people. The bombardment also destroyed the main pipe providing water for 
the Nusairat and al-Boreij refugee camps and knocked out the Strip's only 
electricity generation plant cutting off power for 80% of the population and 
preventing water pumps and sanitation facilities from operating. These actions 
increase the likelihood of a growing humanitarian crisis becoming worse with 
food shipments, medical supplies and other essentials cut off which may lead to 
starvation and a major health disaster. They're also a form of collective 
punishment against Gaza's civilian population which is a violation of 
international law according to the 1949 Geneva Convention Relative to the 
Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Israel now and in the past has 
routinely ignored this Convention, including article 33 under it that prohibits 
reprisals against protected persons and their property. The world community so 
far has yet to take notice or speak out against what's ongoing other than 
weak-kneed and disingenuous calls by world leaders and UN Secretary General Kofi
Annan for both sides to show restraint. It's hard finding the right words to 
respond properly to such an outrageous statement, what little else has been 
said, and most importantly to what hasn't been but should be.

Israeli warships also went further committing a hostile act by entering Syrian 
airspace and buzzing President Bashar al-Assad's home in Latakia in a 
deliberately provocative act before being intercepted and forced to turn back. 
This illegal incursion reflects Israel's continued hostility toward Syria's 
leadership which it accuses of harboring and supporting Hamas leaders the IDF 
has targeted for assassination. It may signal further Israeli action to come, 
with the Bush administration's full support, against a government both countries
see as an enemy. An ominous sign of such potential action came in a veiled 
threat Israel just made against Syria vowing to strike against "those who 
sponsor" the Palestinian resistance.

The West Bank hasn't been spared either as the IDF conducted nearly 50 
incursions into Palestinian communities, razing farmland, raiding homes, seizing
five of them for military sites and arresting dozens of civilians including 
children. In addition, on June 29 the IDF arrested most of the Hamas leadership 
including eight cabinet ministers, 25 PLC members from the Change and Reform 
Party affiliated with Hamas, and other Hamas officials claiming they were 
responsible for the assault against its military post. All these actions are 
further illegal collective punishment reprisals against Palestinian civilians as
are Israeli threats to extra-judicially assassinate Hamas leaders. Middle East 
correspondent Martin Chulov of The Australian, in fact, reported on July 1 that 
in a letter to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas Israel threatened to kill 
democratically elected Prime Minister Ismael Haniyeh if the captured Israeli 
soldier isn't released. The Prime Minister now fears for his life and has gone 
into hiding. What will it take to finally get world leaders to take note, show a
semblance of courage and rectitude, speak out forcefully against this outrageous
threat, and condemn Israel for what it's now inflicting on nearly four million 
defenseless civilians living under its oppressive heel.

This is a particularly desperate time in the lives of the 1.45 million Gazans 
who live in 140 square miles of the most densely populated place on earth. Daily
life for them has been almost unbearable as they've had to endure continued 
Israeli oppression without letup. With only their spirit to enable them to 
resist and armed with little more than rocks, small arms and crude homemade 
rockets, they're pitted against the world's fourth most powerful military 
assaulting them at will. The toll has been devastating.

The IDF Assault on Gaza Was Planned Well in Advance

What's now unfolding in Gaza was planned months ago by the Israelis. They've 
just been waiting for a plausible excuse to unleash it. The capturing, not 
kidnapping, of one of their soldiers as a POW provided it. So far the US, world 
community and UN Secretary General support the Israeli action by their near 
silence. And nothing is said in the major media to condemn a clear crime or 
report anything about the 9,000 or more Palestinian civilians forcibly arrested,
now held in indefinite detention and grievously abused or tortured by the only 
country in the world to effectively legalize torture according to Amnesty 
International (the US, of course, now also has). Many of those in custody are 
political prisoners held administratively without charge, and Israeli human 
rights monitoring group B'Tselem reports Israel's use of torture is widespread 
and routine against them.

It must be asked why world leaders aren't speaking out to condemn this practice.
International law on it is explicit and long-standing. It forbids the use of any
form of torture or degrading treatment under any circumstances. The Universal 
Declaration of Human Rights outlawed it in 1948. The Fourth Geneva Convention 
then did it in 1949 banning any form of "physical or mental coercion" and 
affirming detainees must at all times be treated humanely. The European 
Convention followed in 1950. Then in 1984 the UN Convention Against Torture 
became the first binding international instrument dealing exclusively with the 
issue of banning torture in any form for any reason.

Israel ignores international law (as does its US ally), treats all Palestinians 
it holds in detention with contempt, and feels free to abuse them at will. The 
dominant media in the West pay no attention and have no interest. These are the 
ones John Pilger calls "unworthy victims" in his new book Freedom Next Time. The
Israeli soldier, on the other hand, is a "worthy" one, and reports or just hints
of his mistreatment would be headline news. He also deserves lengthy front page 
coverage in our newspaper of record The New York Times which names him so we all
know and displays his picture. No Palestinian warrants any attention at all in 
the Times or the rest of the corporate media. They all remain nameless and 

What's now unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank has been in the works for months.
Since the staged summer, 2005 Gaza withdrawal, the IDF has been training for a 
large-scale incursion and reoccupation of the territory. This was reported 
earlier this year in Israel's Maariv daily in an interview the paper did with 
IDF Southern Command General Yoav Galant whose unit is responsible for Gaza. He 
clearly stated the IDF would employ "more aggressive military 
activity.......including (re)occupying the Gaza a result of 
increased (Palestinian) attacks." The general may have forgotten to explain 
those "attacks" with crude weapons were Palestinian responses to daily Israeli 
attacks on them with the most sophisticated weapons the IDF has short of nuclear
ones. He also forgot to explain how Gazans have suffered as a result of these 
attacks and near daily killings as well as from the effects of a near forty-year
brutal occupation of their territory. The general, however, was very clear that 
"we (the IDF) have a plan to (re)occupy the Strip" (and) "We are in advanced 
states of preparing forces for readiness." Another IDF official added that "The 
only way Israel can stop the rockets is by occupying Gaza. It is elementary. The
leadership knows it." The official explained further that in recent weeks the 
IDF completed its training to reenter Gaza and informed its soldiers to prepare 
and be ready for orders to move in.

It's quite true that the Palestinian resistance has fired about 250 crude 
homemade rockets from Gaza into Israel in recent months. It's also true these 
have been in response to the many thousands of unprovoked IDF artillery shells 
fired at them as well as frequent air attacks and other assaults against them. 
Little of this is ever reported by the western corporate media, especially in 
the US, and never with any context to explain the true situation on the ground. 
It's also not reported that the IDF trained to be ready to react once it got an 
excuse to do it which the June 25 incident gave it. And it would never be 
reported or even considered that if the Israeli leadership and IDF seriously 
wanted to end retaliatory attacks against them including suicide bombings, an 
easy way to do it would be to stop attacking defenseless Palestinians. The fact 
that it hasn't shows it won't and doesn't want to. Those "elementary" 
considerations are never reported or suggested in the mainstream. Apparently the
dominant media never thought of it, but their mission isn't to think. It's only 
to report what government officials say.

The Gaza Assault Bears Similarity to Lebanon in 1982

The ongoing Israeli assault against Gaza may be following the same pattern as 
the 1982 invasion of Lebanon to destroy the PLO leadership that resulted in the 
deaths of about 18,000 mostly Lebanese and Palestinian civilians. Back then 
Israel needed a pretext to invade to counter the growing respectability the PLO 
was gaining by observing a cease-fire and preferring to pursue negotiations 
instead of terror attacks. This was a catastrophe for the Israeli government as 
it threatened to undermine its hardened position to oppose any political 
settlement which it could only prevent by portraying the PLO as terrorists. To 
do it Israel had to find a way to get the Palestinians to reengage in terrorism 
or at least to defend itself to make it look like terrorism.

Why would the Israeli government then or any other one want to do this? It would
seem logical to assume they all would prefer peace and security to continued 
conflict. Sadly, it didn't then, never did earlier, hasn't since, and clearly 
doesn't now. The reason why goes to the root of Zionists' aims, especially the 
most extreme ones. Many Zionists want all the land of "Eretz Israel," the 
biblical Jewish homeland many Jews believe God gave to the 12 tribes of Israel. 
It includes much more than present day Israel and the Occupied Territories - 
Lebanon, most of Syria, part of Egypt and a large portion of Jordan.

Unlike other countries, Israel has no fixed borders - deliberately. It's been 
that way so Israeli governments have lots of wiggle room to establish them one 
day as they choose or are able to do. Most important is the plan to include as 
part of Israel the ancient lands of "Judea" and "Summaria," the West Bank 
biblical parts of Israel the Palestinians call the Occupied Territories and 
claim as their homeland. Israel has maintained the pretense of being willing to 
allow the Palestinians an independent state. But by refusing to negotiate 
seriously and continuing to encroach on Palestinian land with new and expanded 
settlements as well as erecting its "separation" wall, it's clear Israel's real 
intent is to seize all the land it wants for its own use leaving the 
Palestinians only some isolated bantustan-like less valuable parts.

Beginning with the negotiations leading to the Oslo Accords and their so-called 
Declaration of Principles, Israel never negotiated in good faith with the 
Palestinians. From Oslo, Israel got what it wanted - a Palestinian surrender to 
recognize its right to exist, end the armed struggle against it, and allow it to
continue colonizing the Occupied Territories. In return, the Palestinian 
leadership got nothing more than the right to be Israeli enforcers to control 
its restive population - in other words, to accept its subjugation in return for
no rights or benefits except for some special privileges the leadership got as 
its reward for selling out its people. The Palestinian people never got what 
they most wanted - a viable and independent state of their own in the Occupied 
Territories, with established borders and its capitol in East Jerusalem, and the
right of their refugees to return to their homeland, a right all Jews everywhere
have and which UN Resolution 194 guarantees to all refugees as well as Article 
13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Various other Geneva 
Conventions also affirm this right, clearly establishing in international law 
the absolute and universal "right of return."

Israel never accepted this right for Palestinians and needs to avoid a political
solution to deny it to them. That position was explained by its Prime Minister 
Yitzhak Shamir in the 1980s when he admitted his nation went to war with Lebanon
because there was "a terrible danger....not so much a military one as a 
political one." But Israel couldn't attack without good reason to do it. It 
found none so it manufactured one after the terrorist Abu Nidal organization 
attempted to assassinate the Israeli Ambassador to the UK in London. The 
Israelis blamed it on the PLO that had nothing to do with it. It also went 
unnoticed or reported that the PLO had been at war with the Nidal group for 
years. It didn't matter, and the western media, particularly in the US, reported
that the "Operation Peace for Galilee" Lebanon invasion was undertaken to 
protect Israeli civilians from PLO attacks even though there were none. Who 
would know the difference except the people living there, and the western media 
don't speak to them unless it's to affirm Israeli positions.

The situation today in Gaza bears similarity to 1982. Israel was horrified when 
Hamas won a clear majority of the seats in the January, 2006 elections for the 
Palestinian Legislative Council (PLC). Without the larger than life figure of 
Yasser Arafat to lead it, the Palestinian people finally rejected his Fatah 
party and its long record of corruption and subservience to Israeli dominance. 
Since the election, the Olmert led government has clamped down hard on Hamas, 
calling it a terrorist organization. It's refused to negotiate with it, withheld
Palestinian tax revenues, and succeeded in getting an international political 
boycott of the democratically elected Hamas government as well as most outside 
aid to it cut off. All this has created an unbearable hardship on the already 
desperate Palestinian population.

It didn't matter that Hamas declared a unilateral cease-fire, wanted 
negotiations and was willing to recognize Israel as a legitimate state provided 
Israel gave the Palestinians equal recognition, was willing to return to the 
pre-1967 borders, released Palestinian prisoners and stopped killing and abusing
Palestinians without provocation. Israel refused and, in fact, was as concerned 
about the Hamas cease-fire as it was about the one the PLO observed in 1982 
which Prime Minister Shamir explained was the reason Israel invaded Lebanon. 
Back then, the provocation was the incident in London against the Israeli 
Ambassador and today it's the capturing of an Israeli soldier. These are hardly 
reasons for going to war unless the Israelis planned to wage one anyway and only
needed a reason to do it. The reasons for Israeli actions today are much the 
same as in 1982 - to destroy the Hamas-led government as it did the PLO then and
to reinstitute one again subservient to its wishes. Palestinian President 
Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen) is that kind of leader, has always been in his 
past dealings with Israel, and is the one Olmert wants to lead a future 
Palestinian government or someone just like him.

The current situation in Gaza also has echos of the IDF's Operation Defensive 
Shield in the West Bank in 2002. It included Israel's infamous assault against 
the people of Jenin, a city of 35,000, retaliating against suicide bombings that
occurred during the Second Intifada that began after Knesset member Ariel 
Sharon's provocative visit to the holy Al Aqsa Mosque in September, 2000. The 
suicide bombings, in turn, began in response to extreme Israeli violence against
the Palestinians which by March, 2002 Amnesty International reported had killed 
over 1,000 of them including more than 200 children. During that Operation, 
Israeli forces invaded and attacked all West Bank cities causing an unknown 
number of civilian casualties and deaths. But the harshest assault occurred in 
April, 2002 against Jenin, including its refugee camp. The IDF cut the city off 
from any outside help, destroyed hundreds of buildings (many with people inside 
buried under the rubble), cut off power and water plus food and other essential 
needs from the outside, refused to allow any help to enter the city (including 
medical aid), and killed an unknown number of mostly civilian Palestinian men, 
women and children. No Israeli was ever held to account for these crimes.

Conditions in Jenin today remain grave as they do throughout the Occupied 
Territories as Palestinians now await the full impact of what an IDF 
reoccupation may inflict on them. As mentioned above, the Lebanon invasion 
killed many thousands of innocent Lebanese and Palestinians. It also resulted in
what noted British journalist and Middle East expert Robert Fisk called "one of 
the most shocking war crimes of the 20th century." He referred to what happened 
at the Sabra and Shatila camps when Israeli Defense Minister at the time Ariel 
Sharon in command of the IDF sent a proxy Lebanese Phalange militia force into 
the camps and allowed them to massacre as many as 3,000 or more innocent mostly 
civilian men, women and children. Beyond a brief and unconvincing censure for 
his actions, Sharon never was held to account for his crime and, of course, 
later became Israeli Prime Minister serving until Ehud Olmert succeeded him 
after his disabling stroke.

It now remains to be seen what the final result of the current Israeli assault 
against Gaza, the West Bank and the Palestinian leadership will be. It may be 
some time before we know as it's just beginning. But if the Lebanon and Jenin 
experiences are examples to go by, many innocent Palestinian lives will be lost,
and the state of the Palestinian people will only get far worse before it ever 
has a chance to become better. Will the world community finally take note and 
act to stop a likely impending slaughter. The past record indicates it won't. 
It's the purpose of this writing to demand it does so and quickly and to hold a 
criminal Israeli leadership accountable for its war crimes and crimes against 
humanity against the long-suffering Palestinian people who deserve the same 
freedoms as all Israelis and everyone else.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at 
•••@••.•••. Also visit his blog site at

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of 
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on 

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at grants 
permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in their entirety, or
any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title 
are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink 
address to the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright 
note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or 
other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: •••@••.••• contains copyrighted material the use of which has not 
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such 
material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an 
effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social 
issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who 
have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair 
use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: •••@••.•••

© Copyright Stephen Lendman, Global Research, 2006

The url address of this article is:

© Copyright 2005
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy