EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

EU/US Merger: New Global Order By Stealth

Few notice huge shift towards globalization as frothing masses distracted by 
climate change debate

Steve Watson

Friday, May 4, 2007   In a sweeping move that has garnered surprisingly little 
attention this week the United States and the European Union have signed up to a
new transatlantic economic partnership that will see regulatory standards 
"harmonized" and will lay the basis for a merging of the US and EU into one 
single market, a huge step on the path to a new globalized world order.

The BBC reported from the Summit in Washington on Monday:

€ The two sides agreed to set up an "economic council" to push ahead with 
regulatory convergence in nearly 40 areas, including intellectual property, 
financial services, business takeovers and the motor industry.

Skipping over what the fall out from a single Western market will be, the BBC 
simply announced "The aim is to increase trade and lower costs." before moving 
swiftly on to analyse what this means in terms of global warming.

While the masses are being whipped up into a never ending frenzy over climate 
change at every given opportunity, hardcore political actions that will affect 
the lives of everyone on the planet in the here and now are being skated over 
with little or no attention being paid to them.

The proponents and architects of a one world order have worked long and hard 
behind the scenes for a long time pushing a gradual erosion of national 
sovereignty via a harmonization of all areas of life, economic, social, cultural
and environmental.

Such harmonization and elimination of diversity is the only way to maximize the 
profit of the few at the expense of the many, while maintaining tight controls 
over society as a whole in order for a long continuation of that status quo.

The global corporate elite are the only ones who will benefit from essentially 
wiping out the free market and eliminating economic competition across nations.

The EU has long been used as a tool for such harmonizing globalization and has 
now reached the point at which it has become a supranational federal government 
for Europe. Over the years, what was originally sold as a simple free trade 
treaty has slowly been built from the bottom up into an all encompassing 
monolithic authority over the entire region.

The areas it now seeks to dominate also include public health, social policy, 
transport, justice, agriculture, fisheries, energy, economic and social 
cohesion, the environment, internal and external trade, and consumer protection.

It has recently been highlighted that European globalists such as Britain's Tony
Blair and Germany's Angela Merkel are seeking to implement by stealth areas of 
the EU constitution regardless of its blanket rejection by voters. Senior 
British Cabinet sources have warned that they are also pushing hard for Brussels
to be given a full-time unelected president, who would serve a five year term 
and speak as the voice of Europe on the world stage.

It is commonly accepted that reforms to strengthen the European Parliament, 
scheduled to be implemented before 2009, could undermine the ability of member 
states to opt out of EU laws, as Britain does at present, effectively ending 
national sovereignty.

In their important history of the EU, The Great Deception, British authors 
Christopher Booker and Richard North, concluded that the 27 member nations now 
entangled in the union have ceded their sovereignty in a carefully planned 
stealth operation. They grudgingly credit european globalists with accomplishing
"a slow-motion coup d¹etat: the most spectacular coup d¹etat in history."

The authors of The Great Deception summarized the effect of the Treaty of Rome: 
"Thus did the central deception of the whole story become established. From now 
on, the real agenda, political integration, was to be deliberately concealed 
under the guise of economic integration. Building Europe was to be presented as 
a matter of trade and jobs."

In addition dissidents and outcasts such as Vladimir Bukovksy have warned that 
an elite plan has long existed whereby the EU would be hijacked and transformed 
into a Soviet style Socialist superstate that would eliminate the individual 
nation state's power and create a governing body with no accountability or 
direct representation.

In 2003 the BBC uncovered incredible archived documents which confirmed that 
both the EU and its single currency, the Euro, were the brainchild of the 
secretive Bilderberg Group. Some 50 years BEFORE the implementation of the 
European single currency, Bilderberg, now infamous as the secret elite hand 
behind world events, had drawn up the plans.

In addition to the EU, an agenda for a North American Union is now beyond doubt 
and is well on course according to the internal policy documents of its 
unelected legislators, the Council on Foreign Relations.

The CFR's North American Union mirrors Bilderberg's European Union. In the CFR's
document, Building a North American Community, mention is given to the 
Bilderberg group in a recommendation that private bodies be formed to direct 
policy between Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The document states:

"To ensure a regular injection of creative energy into the various efforts 
related to North American integration, the three governments should appoint an 
independent body of advisers. This body should be composed of eminent persons 
from outside government, appointed to staggered multiyear terms to ensure their 
independence. Their mandate would be to engage in creative exploration of new 
ideas from a North American perspective and to provide a public voice for North 
America. A complementary approach would be to establish private bodies that 
would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along
the lines of the Bilderberg..."

Very much like the EU, provisions for a NAU such as NAFTA and GATT were sold at 
their inception as free trade agreements. As time has progressed we have 
witnessed the birth of the "Security and Prosperity Partnership", a treaty, 
which seems to be a little more than a simple economic agreement, between 
leaders of the US, Mexico and Canada that has been agreed without Congressional 

A Canadian report has described the SPP as "an international framework for 
trilateral and bilateral cooperation in North America" that is "not a formal 
international treaty" or "an overarching binding legal agreement." But what is 
an "international framework" that commits U.S. officials from various federal 
agencies to working with officials of two other countries? Why is such a process
not subjected to congressional scrutiny and approval?

Last September we reported that Journalist Jerome Corsi had received the first 
documents pertaining to a FOIA request asking for full disclosure of the SPP 
office in its activities towards creating a Pan American Union.

The documents show that a wide range of US administrative law is being 
re-written in stealth under this program to "integrate" and "harmonize" with 
administrative law in Mexico and Canada, just as has become commonplace within 
the EU.

The documents contain references to upwards of 13 working groups within an 
entire organized infrastructure that has drawn from officials within most areas 
of administrative government including U.S. departments of State, Homeland 
Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and 
Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

Corsi also reported that at a recent high-level confab in Banff, an assistant 
U.S. secretary of state, Thomas A. Shannon , chaired a panel that featured a 
presentation by Prof. Robert Pastor, author of a book promoting the development 
of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero
as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

Just a conspiracy theory? Not according to Steve Previs of Jefferies 
International who stated on CNBC, "I think one thing for people who are dollar 
based need to focus on is the Amero, that's the one thing that nobody is talking
about that I think is going to have a big impact... on everybody's life in 
Canada, the U.S. and Mexico..."

A global crash, predicted by former World Bank chief economist and nobel prize 
winner Joseph Stiglitz, and a totally devalued dollar that can barely rival the 
peso are greasing the skids for a single North American currency. This spells 
disaster for all Americans who wish to maintain their standard of living and not
find themselves barefoot on the street in a bread queue.

The decline of the economy in the US is being caused by the very predatory 
globalist policies of the IMF and World Bank that are still presented to us as 
the solution for economic turmoil. These two globalist vampires have drained the
third world dry, and are now focusing their attention on enslaving the developed

The single currency and a 'new economic order' is a major step on the road to 
global governance. Europe already has its own strong single currency, while the 
dollar's days seem to be numbered. When money is being printed by a private 
corporation is it any surprise to see a push for a merger with other countries' 

Talk has long been of a global currency by 2018 if plans go accordingly. A 1988 
famous cover of The Economist emphasized this, depicting a phoenix standing atop
burning paper money symbolizing its rise out of their destruction, with the 
words "Get ready for a world currency" next to it. The article carried in The 
Economist, titled "Get Ready for the Phoenix," stated that, "THIRTY years from 
now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, 
and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with 
the same currency."

The article went on to state that sovereignty will be lost with the advent of 
the new currency, but that trends towards globalization are already doing away 
with it anyway.

"The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There 
would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world 
phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the 
IMF. The world inflation rate - and hence, within narrow margins, each national 
inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public 
spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather
than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the 
inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their 
borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big 
loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing 
are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less 
floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy 
independence checked by an unfriendly outside world."

"Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes," the 
article concludes.

In 2004 Robert Mundell, the Nobel-prize winning economist often credited with 
paving the way to the European single currency, called for a global currency.

In an interview with French paper Libération, Mundell said: "With the emergence 
of the euro and its instability against the dollar, Europe, the United States 
and the Asian powers should come together and create a new international 
monetary system."

In 2006 the scandal-ridden and highly secretive Bank For International 
Settlements, considered to be the world's top central banking policy, released a
policy paper that called for the end of national currencies in favor of a global
model of currency formats.

The BIS is a branch of the of the Bretton-Woods International Financial 
architecture and closely allied with the Bilderberg Group. It is controlled by 
an inner elite that represents all the world's major central banking 
institutions. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the most influential economist of all
time, wanted it closed down as it was used to launder money for the Nazis in 
World War II.

It appears we are now seeing the slow realization of a gloabal economic system 
with a single currency.

The end game of such regionalizing harmonization is of course a global 

It has long been recognized that an instant world government would be roundly 
rejected by the masses and that a stepping stone agenda, a stealth 
implementation of a new global order is the key to its success.

Writing in the April 1974 issue of Foreign Affairs, the flagship publication of 
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Richard N. Gardner , who has held a 
number of State Department posts, argued against what he called "instant world 
government." Instead, he wrote, "the 'house of world order' will have to be 
built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a 
great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of 
reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, 
will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."

In a similar sentiment, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski 
pointed to "regionalization" as the key for "globalization" in his address to 
Gorbechev's State of the World Forum in October 1995: "The precondition for 
eventual globalization ‹ genuine globalization ‹ is progressive regionalization,
because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units."

This week we have witnessed the first steps towards the biggest "cooperative 
unit" there has ever been with the groundwork being set for a EU-US single 
market. However, as the CFR would say, amidst the "booming, buzzing confusion" 
few have noticed.

Daniel Taylor of Old-thinker news contributed research to this report.

Copyright © All rights reserved.

Printed from:

Posting archives:
Escaping the Matrix website:
cyberjournal website:

Community Democracy Framework:

Subscribe cyberjournal list: •••@••.•••  (send blank message)

cyberjournal blog (join in):

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)