Congress refuses to rubber-stamp torture


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Bush urges Congress to ratify military tribunals
Judiciary panel vows policy review
By Rick Klein, Globe Staff  |  July 12, 2006

WASHINGTON -- Bush administration officials yesterday asked Congress to endorse 
the special military tribunals established by the president to try prisoners 
captured in the war on terror, but Republicans and Democrats alike balked at 
giving the White House quick legislative approval to a controversial system that
the Supreme Court invalidated just two weeks ago.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, a top Pentagon attorney urged lawmakers
to resist changing the military commissions set up for detainees at the US 
prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Defense Department's principal deputy 
general counsel, Daniel J. Dell'Orto, said that reworking established procedures
``even modestly" would hamper efforts to bring terrorists to justice.

``The most expeditious way to do it would be to essentially ratify the process 
that's already in place with the military commissions," Dell'Orto said. ``It is 
simply not feasible in time of war to gather evidence in a manner that meets 
strict criminal procedural requirements."

Judiciary committee members, however, vowed a thorough review of the 
administration's policy -- a stark message to the White House that GOP leaders 
in Congress aren't going to rubber-stamp Bush's requests. Lawmakers said they 
would establish new justice procedures for detainees regarding such issues as 
their right to counsel, the use of evidence obtained through coercive tactics, 
and the admissibility of hearsay evidence.

``We're not going to leave it to the Department of Defense, or give the 
Department of Defense a blank check," Senate Judiciary chairman Arlen Specter, a
Pennsylvania Republican, said at the hearing. ``We're going to establish the 
standards and the policy, but we want your input before we do it."

Senator Lindsey O. Graham, a former Air Force lawyer, urged the administration 
to scrap the military commissions and consult with Congress about creating a new
system to try detainees. The starting point for discussions, Graham said, should
be the military's own justice system, and said additional safeguards could be 
installed to reflect the fact that trials for terror suspects should not harm 
national security.

``If you'll adopt that attitude and that approach, we can get a product not only
that will pass court muster, but that the nation will be proud of," said Graham,
a South Carolina Republican. ``If you fight that approach, it's going to be a 
long, hot summer."

On June 29, the Supreme Court ruled that the military commissions President Bush
established to try detainees held at Guantanamo violated the Geneva Conventions 
and US law, but the high court suggested that Congress could fix the problem 
through legislation. The administration now wants lawmakers to legally establish
the military commissions as is.

As Congress began to weigh its response yesterday, the Pentagon released a memo 
pledging to treat detainees in accordance with the minimum standards of humane 
treatment required by the Geneva Conventions. The memo is consistent with the 
court ruling, which found that detainees are entitled to the protections against
degrading treatment covered by the conventions.

The memo by Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England does not change 
administration policy, but clarifies its existing policies in the wake of the 
court ruling, establishing adherence to the conventions as a legal requirement, 
White House press secretary Tony Snow said. Under the conventions, detainees are
protected from ``mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture," as well as 
``outrages upon personal dignity" such as ``humiliating and degrading 
treatment." It also provides that sentences can only be handed down by courts 
``affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by
civilized people."

The administration has not changed its long-held contention that ``enemy 
combatants" in Guantanamo and elsewhere aren't ``prisoners of war," an official 
designation that would entitle the detainees to additional rights and 

The court's 5-to-3 ruling against military tribunals has prompted Congress to 
take up the issue of prisoners held at Guantanamo, an area of law in which the 
Bush administration has claimed sweeping powers. Three separate congressional 
committees are holding hearings this week on how to proceed on trying suspected 
terrorists at Guantanamo in the wake of the ruling.

Members of both parties served notice yesterday that politics will color the 
election-year discussions over how to handle suspected terrorists in US custody.
Republicans see the debate as a chance to paint Democrats as soft on suspected 
terrorists for wanting to grant them due-process rights. Democrats want to focus
attention on areas where Bush, a Republican president, has worked unilaterally 
-- and, at least in this instance, outside the law.

Senator Russell Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, said the high court's ``major 
rebuke" of the Bush administration calls into further question other activities 
authorized by the president in the war on terror, including the National 
Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program. ``The administration's 
extreme theories of executive power, its unilateral approach, and its refusal to
listen to any dissent . . . have been entirely counterproductive and have harmed
our relations around the world, weakening us in the fight against al Qaeda and 
its allies," Feingold said.

Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., a Delaware Democrat, said the ruling is the latest 
example of a wartime mistake by the president, and said Bush's continued use of 
Guantanamo as a detention facility is harming the US image abroad. `` Things 
ain't good in Happy Valley," Biden said. ``I find it difficult for us to buy on 
to the notion, `Let's trust the president's judgment.' God love him, his 
judgment has been terrible on Iraq. His judgment has been terrible on the 
conduct of the war."

Steven G. Bradbury, the administration's acting assistant attorney general, shot
back that Bush ``has done what he thought is best to protect the country from 
another attack." The world, he said, ``is a dangerous place; it's not Happy 
Valley." A cadre of Republicans on the panel sounded largely the same theme: 
Providing terror suspects with due-process protections, such as access to 
evidence against them and the right to remain silent, could harm efforts to 
thwart attacks.

``It could make the difference between whether thousands die or not," said 
Senator Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican.

``This is a life-and-death matter," added Senator Jeff Sessions, Republican of 
Alabama. ``People are dying in Iraq and can die in this country on a regular 
basis." Senator John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, said terrorist detainees, who 
may have knowledge of planned attacks, can't be treated the same as a 
conventional POW or criminal suspect. To think otherwise, he said, is to have a 
``pre-9/11 mindset."

Senator Charles E. Schumer, a New York Democrat, said Democrats aren't 
suggesting the administration shouldn't ``have every tool necessary" to fight 
terror. But Bush and his administration have acted ``as if they are the whole 
government," Schumer said. ``Time and time again, the president acts like a bull
in a china shop and sets back the war on terror."

In a memo to Democrats, Senate minority leader Harry Reid of Nevada wrote that 
the party will offer up an ``honest assessment" of the president's wartime 
conduct. High on the list of criticisms: Bush's military commissions haven't 
tried or convicted any suspected terrorists. ``Bush Republicans, despite the 
tough talk, have failed to come up with a working system to keep America safe," 
Reid wrote.

© Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy