-------------------------------------------------------- From: "Westaway" <•••@••.•••> To: <•••@••.•••> Subject: 911 a Black Military Operation Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:41:53 -0700 X-Priority: 3 Monday Brownbagger of April 25, 2005. More discrepancies from the official mass media story are appearing almost daily regarding the 911 incident. In past programs I have given you reams of information pointing to a made-in-the-US 911 event. And yet the mass media keeps putting out disinformation saying that 911 was planned and carried out strictly by Al Queda. On this sector of the Monday Brownbagger, I will give additional evidence that should cinch the case for a made-in-the-US 911 event that should convince even the most right wing, diehard George W. Bush supporter. This article will include some of the most recent and convincing findings to date. The source of information for this entire article is http://rense.com According to the official story, at 8:45 am local time, an American Airlines Boeing 767-200 (Flight 11), flying from Boston, Massachusetts to Los Angeles, California, impacted the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York City after being supposedly hijacked by terrorists. 18 minutes later, at 9:03 am, United Airlines Flight 175, a Boeing 767-200 enroute from Boston to Los Angeles, flew into the south tower, also supposedly as a result of terrorist activity. The towers continued burning for approximately an hour, and twenty minutes apart, then both collapsed due to supposed structural damage sustained in the crashes. I repeat, the official story is that the plane that impacted the south tower was a Boeing 767-200. Yet, in reviewing crash footage taken by an ABC news crew, a man named Corley was able to track the trajectory of the fragments he studied - including a section of the landing gear and parts of an engine - as they tore through the South Tower, exited from the building's north side and fell into the street. The parts are left undamaged enough to enabled him to clearly see that they did not belong to the 767-200 that supposedly hit the tower, killing all its occupants and the highjackers. When Corley examined the pictures of the gear, he was able to determine that it came not from a Boeing 767-200, but from a Boeing 737-100. Further, when Corley examined the picture of the engine from the same plane, he determined that the engine shaft was part of a CFM-56 engine, a power plant used solely for all 737's after the 737-200 series. This information is found on http://rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Jon Carlson has taken excerpts from La Vanguardia, one of the biggest and most respected newspapers in Spain, and some very interesting data has been revealed. Frozen and blown up images of the plane that hit the south tower show evidence of remote control devices that were used to guide the plane into the tower. On the underside of the plane were visible three strange shapes, which the aeronautical experts found no clear explanation. They consisted of two long shapes located underneath the fuselage, one towards the bow and the other towards the stern of the plane. A third, seemingly pyramidal in shape, was found on the underbelly, almost in the center of the plane. A contour-detection digital analysis of the still photos, carried out at the Escola Universitària Politècnica de Mataró, concluded that the "objects discerned cannot be due to shadows caused by the angle of incidence of the sun upon the plane as they always appear as the same shape and size, although their luminosity varies." It was concluded that the objects were not due to a trick of light, that they had relief, and that they were not part of the landing gear. When La Vanguardia asked Boeing's head office in Seattle about the strange forms to be seen in the photographs, the company declined to give an opinion citing reasons of national security. In response to Carlson's article, an Avionics expert with 35 years experience in the area of Avionics on numerous military and commercial aircraft stated that the objects on the photos looked like a remote control package. He said that what we were looking at is not the normal configuration of a commercial aircraft. For those that want more detail, there are links in Carlson's article to websites showing the components of the remote control package and describing their operation. Failure of FBI investigation of the South Tower airliner 'bulges' has led to speculation that missiles or bombs were attached to the bottom of the aircraft. Premier 9/11 website, http://the-movement.com , has concluded that the 911 incident was a military operation. Carlson's article can be found at http://rense.com/general63/st.htm In a second article by Carlson, closely following the previous one, a second avionics specialist detected a second remote control antenna on the airliner that hit the south tower. She agreed with the previous avionics expert that the blade antennas, circled in yellow on the photos in the article, are not found on commercial airliners. The antenna on the airliner's tail section was deduced to be a planar phased array antenna, a lower frequency high gain antenna, that has the advantage of being easy to lock onto when on a fast moving aircraft and is highly directional. She was amazed that the antenna had been attached to the outside of the tail section with no effort at concealment and commented that it was an indication of the arrogance of the people involved that they weren't worried about it being detected. This article can be found at http://rense.com/general63/secnd.htm It is Carlson's third article in this series that really ties things together and adds more evidence that the 911 incident was a black military operation. Hank Brandli, former meteorologist at Hickman Air Force Base in Hawaii, says that with military operations weather is always a top priority and comments that, with 911, "I think they had a weather guy on their team to help set it up." Further, he thinks that they spent months and maybe years planning the operation. He said that the 911 operation had to come down to a last-second call, because there was a hurricane coming up the coast and a cold front moving out. He added that September is the worst month of the year to be planning such an operation. A northwest wind, of which there were only five in the month of September, 2001, was necessary to hide a military helicopter that was serving as a remote control station to guide the airliner to the south tower. September 11 was one of those five clear days with a northwest wind. The meteorologist says that five-day weather forecasts are now made with great accuracy. And what is the significance of this? Well, President Bush had tentatively planned to be at Booker school giving his infamous talk about a pet goat, but had kept his booking unconfirmed because of "security reasons," until five days before 911. Then, it is thought, when he got the OK from his meteorologist with the favorable 5-day forecast, suddenly his speaking appearance was on. Within minutes after the airliner crashed into the north tower and formed a smudge pot plume with the smoke emanating from the tower, a Bell 212 helicopter used the smoke plume to enter the WTC airspace unnoticed to ground observers, but not the cameras filming from a distance. There was a window of 17 minutes between crashes, which meant that the helicopter started its trip to the WTC before the North Tower was hit, indicating pre-knowledge. The helicopter placed itself over the south tower so that it could steer the airliner at itself, but then dive it into the south tower below. Scott Forbes, a worker at Fiduciary Trust in the south tower, reported that on September 8 and 9, power was shut off in that tower from floor 50 upward. This effectively shut off all of the security cameras and, according to Forbes, there were many, many 'engineers' coming and leaving the tower at that time. There is much other incriminating evidence in this article, which can be found at http://rense.com/general63/wte.htm In a further article by Jon Carlson, a CNN video filmed the south tower helicopter and three things were noticed. There were two antennas, one an antenna for receiving video from the incoming controlled airliner and there were two white blade antennas on the bottom of the boom that communicate with the blade antennas on the incoming airliner. The helicopter was also unmarked. The remote control station for the incoming airliner to the north tower, the first tower hit, was a small white jet that was filmed flying in formation right above the incoming 737. It was filmed by video cameras. The white jet was filmed by the camera of a Japanese tourist as the incoming plane hit the south tower. The white jet guided the incoming airliner to Manhattan Island. Then control of the incoming airliner was 'handed off' to the Bell helicopter, which guided the 737 into the south tower. From a shadow cast on the north tower by the white jet, it was determined that the jet was about 35 feet long. Pennsylvania witnesses described the white jet in exacting detail. Their description fits the 36-foot long Saab 105 SK60 military jet used in the Swedish and Austrian Air Forces. This article can be found at http://rense.com/general64/white.htm In another report from On Line Journal, Karl W.B. Schwarz has shown discrepancies in the official story of the plane that hit the Pentagon, supposedly a Boeing 757. He has looked at pictures of the wrecked engine part taken by the mass media and has done a comparison of relative size of the engine and has also looked at the configuration of the engine. He concludes that the Pentagon part is not from a Boeing 757, period. After further research, his investigative team finally found what might be the actual type of part that was filmed at the Pentagon. It was determined to be a 737 type of "turbojet" power plant, with a probability to be in the "modified A-3 Sky Warrior twin-turbojet airplane and was never used on a Boeing 757. Schwarz added that he would bet that a jet mechanic from Evergreen Air (a known CIA affiliated company) could tell us where that fan blade on the Pentagon engine part came from and hoped that he would do so in front of a Spitzer or Morganthau grand jury. The Sky Warrior was also capable of carrying and firing an air to air missile, the type of which could have blown the hole in the side of the Pentagon. Schwarz's team has also examined other wreckage at the Pentagon site including a diffuser case, a wheel hub and a tire. All of these parts, it was concluded, could not have been from a Boeing 757. Schwarz added that someone had taken the pains to remove pictures of the Pentagon parts from the internet so that they could not be identified and that it had taken his team several years of digging to do the investigative work. Schwarz's article can be found at http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/ 020205schwarz.html As to the question of what happened to the bodies of the passengers if the planes that hit the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon did not contain any people and were guided by remote control. We go to an interview with Karl Schwarz. The answer is said to come from two air traffic controllers who came forward and started talking. They said that both of the flights that took off and supposedly hit the World Trade Center were actually directed to the east instead of to the west and they disappeared in a single sweep of the radar out over the Atlantic. Further, the two meteorologists said that they know the location of the airfield that the two remotely guided airliners that hit the towers took off from. This article is found at http://rense.com/general64/wth.htm Finally, we go to an article entitled A 9/11 Checkmate by TvNewsLIES.ORG The article proposes that some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe and that there is a real danger of frightening everyone off by offering too much information. So the writer has compared the problem to a chess game and offers two strategic moves that will lead to a checkmate. He says the two pieces of the 9/11 puzzle, that on their own expose the lies of the US administration are: 1) the abnormal number of put options that were placed anonymously on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks, otherwise known as the cover up and 2) the controlled demolition of building 7. First. Let's deal with the put options. That a highly abnormal number of put options were placed on the two airlines involved, points to foreknowledge of the attacks. The identity of the investor is known by the financial institution that processed the investment and yet nothing has been done to reveal the name of the investor because the person's identity is being protected by the government. If the name of the investor was known, then it is assumed that we would have the name of a person who had foreknowledge of the event. The second issue is the controlled demolition of building 7. FEMA investigators claim that WTC 7 fell as a result of burning for 7 hours. But FEMA's claim is contradicted by Larry Silverstein, the new owner of the building, who made a public statement to the TV mass media saying that a decision was made to pull building 7, in other words to demolish it. But a controlled demolition requires weeks or even months to plan. This meant that the explosives had to be planted far in advance of the 911 event because explosive charges are not installed in the routine construction of a building. In addition, this decision to demolish building 7 was never questioned by the Kean Commission. And then to make things even nicer for Silverstein, he received a settlement of $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers for the willful demolition of his own building in which he had invested $386 million, coming away with a windfall of $475 million. -- ============================================================ If you find this material useful, you might want to check out our website (http://cyberjournal.org) or try out our low-traffic, moderated email list by sending a message to: •••@••.••• You are encouraged to forward any material from the lists or the website, provided it is for non-commercial use and you include the source and this disclaimer. Richard Moore (rkm) Wexford, Ireland "Escaping The Matrix - Global Transformation: WHY WE NEED IT, AND HOW WE CAN ACHIEVE IT ", old draft: http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/rkmGlblTrans.html _____________________________ "...the Patriot Act followed 9-11 as smoothly as the suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the Reichstag fire." - Srdja Trifkovic There is not a problem with the system. The system is the problem. Faith in ourselves - not gods, ideologies, leaders, or programs. _____________________________ cj list archives: http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=cj newslog list archives: http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=newslog _____________________________ Informative links: http://www.indymedia.org/ http://www.globalresearch.ca/ http://www.greenleft.org.au/index.htm http://www.MiddleEast.org http://www.rachel.org http://www.truthout.org http://www.williambowles.info/monthly_index/ http://www.zmag.org http://www.co-intelligence.org ============================================================
