World War III immanent?

2005-08-17

Richard Moore

Friends,

I'm on holiday, without my usual computer resources, and so this
posting will be lacking the kind of documentation that I normally try
to provide. The stories have been breaking so rapidly however, that I
feel I must post something before all hell breaks loose. I'm kind of
working from memory. You may want to use Google to track down some of
the stories I'm reporting on.

Iran is the focus point. Iran has no program to develop nuclear
weapons and everyone knows that. The CIA leaked a report that it would
take Iran 10 years to develop nuclear weapsns, and the UN inspectors,
who have unlimited access, have given Iran a clean report. U.S. claims
to the contrary are exactly like the WMD propaganda preceding the
invasion of Iraq: pure lies invented to justify an invasion that has
entirely different motivations. We all know the motivation: the PNAC
agenda; oil as powwer; maintaining control of global finance by London
and New York banks.

The scenario for World War III is incredibly obvious. There will be no
surprise for anyone who has their eyes open. Washington spells it out
when they say they are "expecting" multiple simultaneous terrorist
attacks in the U.S. very soon. They should know, since they are the
ones who will be carrying out the attacks.

It is worth noting that no steps are being taken to prevent these
"attacks", or to protect the population - instead, the events are
simply being "predicted". Doesn't that strike anyone as odd? If there
really was a fear of hostile attack, wouldn't there be some kind of
attempt at defense? If our intelligence is so good that we "know
attacks are coming", then why is there no information about where,
who, or how?? Have any of you noticed these obvious glitches in the
Matrix??

Meanwhile, Cheney has ordered the military to prepare for a nuclear
attack on Iran - to be launched as soon as any domestic "terrorist
incident" occurs - regardless of whether a connection to Iran exists.
How obvious can they get? The world "covert" seems to have little
significance any more. They seem to be playing with a more-or-less
open hand.

We know - from both 9/11 and the London bombings - that "security
exercises" are a standard cover for false-flag incidents. On 9/11,
serurity exercises were being carried out regarding - surprise,
surprise - attacks by hijacked airliners on major American targets! On
July 7, in London, exercises were being carried out regarding -
surprise, surprise - subway bombings in exactly the same places that
were actully bombed! The phenomenon, of exercise turning into
false-flag incident, is called "going live". There is little reason to
believe that this proven succssful formula will not be used for the
launch of WW III.

In this current case, it seems there will be more than one
simultaneous false-flag incident, and hence more than one "exercise".
One of these, evidently, is or was to be down in Charlottsville. A
nuclear weapon is to be hijacked off a military ship and then
detonated in a populated area. That's the "exercise" and that's also
what's likely to happen - unless this particular part of the plan has
been thwarted.

I've been seeing persistent rumors, becoming gradually more credible,
that elements of the military and intelligence services are rebelling
against this planned launch of WW III. A woman named "Sorcha" -easily
found via Google - claims to have access to "Russian intelligence
sources", and has been putting out a series of reports of a major coup
in progress - a battle between the neocon faction and loyal Americans
in the Pentagon and Langley. I find her stuff "over the top", but you
may want to look at it, just to see one view on how deep the rabbit
hole may go.

It is undeniably true however, that a 4 Star General in the
Charlottsville area was fired in the last few days for "sexual
misconduct". This is absurd. Even drill sargeants don't get fired for
such a trivial offense. It's obviously a cover story. Rumor has it
that he found out that the Charllotsville "exercise" was going to "go
live" and that he was planning to put a stop to it.

It is also undeniably true that all U.S. military leaves have been
cancelled beginning in September. And huge stockpiles of heavy weapons
systems have been accumulating on military bases. And of course we've
known for some time that Israel has been suppled with "bunker buster"
bombs so that they can initiate the first attack as a U.S. proxy,
providing what we might call "plausbible deniability".

These facts are perfectly clear:

(1) Iran's leaders are adamant about pursuing their right to pursue an
agenda of peaceful nuclear power generation.

(2) The U.S. is adamant about using this as a (flimsy) excuse for an
attack.

(3) China and Russia have supplied Iran with very advanced missile, to
protect their investments in Iran.

(4) In event of attack, Iran would be likely to launch effective
missile strikes on Israel, U.S. forces in Iraq, and U.S. carrier taks
forces. In addition, they would be able to sink shipping in such a way
as to disrupt global oil supplies.

(5) If Israel is attacked, in the sense of major Tel Aviv casualties,
they would be likely to escalate... Syria, Lebanon, perhaps Russia.

The overall scenario is very reminiscent of the pre WW I scenario,
more than WW II. Iran is like Sarjeavo. (apologies: one of the things
I don't have with me is my spell checker.) We are likely to see a
series of escalations.

China and Russia have been coming together at an amazingly fast rate.
Both are very savvy nations, both intelligence-wise and
economics-wise. They know they are the real targets of the
Anglo-American expansionist designs and they know that they must take
a stand sooner or later - or else accept the chains fo domination.
China and Russia have been making all sorts of deals in terms of
Russian oil for Chinese money, joint military exercises, technology
exchanges, etc.

The handwriting is on the wall. The ducks are all in a row. I can only
add one personal note: I go on holday very infrequently. The last time
I was planning to return from Hawaii was 9/11/2001. I was delayed due
to surprise events. I am now in Scotland, and planning to return of
Aug 23. We'll see.

rkm
http://cyberjournal.org