US soldiers: Iraq massacre not exception


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

US soldiers: Iraq massacre not exception

Coral Wynter & Jim McIlroy, Caracas

The response of the Pentagon and White House to the massacre of more 
than 20 Iraqi civilians by US marines in Haditha last year has 
followed a familiar pattern. Official investigations into the 
incident were finally forced by the publication in Time magazine of 
details of the killings. The massacre has been presented as a 
horrifying aberration of US policy in Iraq.

However, on May 20 US group Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) 
issued a statement that explained: "The massacre at Haditha is not an 
exception to the situation in Iraq, it is a punctuation mark in a 
longer atrocity - the war itself."

The statement said that foreign troops "cannot simultaneously be 
empathetic to a population and be obliged to control that same 
population by pointing guns at them, breaking into their homes, 
turning them into collateral damage, and taking vengeance on them out 
of the inevitable frustration of fighting an urban 

At the World Social Forum, held in the Venezuelan capital of Caracas 
in January, Green Left Weekly spoke to IVAW member Geoff Millard. 
Millard explained that US soldiers are forced to dehumanise Iraqis to 
carry out Washington's brutal occupation policy.

He told GLW, "US soldiers are put into a situation where they are 
forced to brutalise, forced to racialise, forced to sexualise 
everyone in order to dominate and control a people".

"The way that has to be done is that you are forced to dehumanise 
that person. That's what they are doing in Iraq. You see this 
brutalisation factor whenever you talk to World War 2 veterans about 
'Japs'. In Vietnam they were 'gooks' and in Iraq the people are 
called 'haji' [among Muslims, haji refers to a person who has made 
the pilgrimage to Mecca and is used as a term of respect, but among 
US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan it has been turned into a racist 
epithet]. So the racist, class brutality continues. The real Iraqis 
getting bombed are the poor. It's the poor in Iraq who make up the 
resistance, just like anywhere, because the rich are still going to 
get their's, whatever."

Millard said that when soldiers who go home to the US suffer 
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), "the first thing the 
government does is deny all claims. Then they put you through an 
evaluation process, where doctors poke and probe - they're not 
actually treating you. This can go on for a number of months, 
possibly years. Then they diagnose you as having bi-polar disorder, 
not PTSD, because with bi-polar disorder, you don't get a disability 
pension ... or they say you have depression.

"Then they finally diagnose something, after god knows how long. Then 
they throw medication at you. You can take Prozac, or Xanax ... 
Whatever they prescribe is not working. They medicate and drug the 
veteran. Once this medication doesn't work, they might look into real 
treatment for PTSD."

"Vietnam Veterans Against the War have been working on this for 40 
years, and have a solution that works, and are counselling returned 
soldiers on this problem", he told GLW. But the Department of 
Veterans Affairs isn't doing it and at the same time, "the government 
is closing all the veterans' centres".

Veterans of the Iraq war "want to go somewhere else for treatment, 
but all their records stay with Veterans Affairs. There are no 
medical records and no funding for treatment elsewhere".

A 2004 United Press International article revealed that, as of July 
that year, almost 28,000 Iraq veterans had sought health care from 
Veterans Affairs. "One out of every five was diagnosed with a mental 
disorder, according to the VA", UPI reported.

"We have spent US$440 billion on a war on Iraq to brutalise and 
destroy our own people at the same time. They are closing down 
hospitals and overworking the staff, both nurses and doctors, and are 
denying PTSD claims", Millard said.

Another issue facing veterans of Washington's wars in the Persian 
Gulf is so-called Gulf War Syndrome, often linked to the use by US 
forces of "depleted uranium" munitions. The use of DU weapons in the 
1991 Gulf War is believed to be a cause of the dramatic increase in 
cancer and birth defects among Iraqis in the war's aftermath.

"We don't see the problem of depleted uranium straight away. It takes 
five, 10, 12 years down the road before you see the main effects", 
Millard said. "Right now there is a ward full of people dying of Gulf 
War Syndrome in my town in Buffalo, New York. Most of that has been 
traced to depleted uranium." "For years, the government denied [GWS] 
existed", he explained .

GLW asked Millard his opinion of Cindy Sheehan, the woman who became 
a high-profile anti-war activist after her son was killed while 
serving in the US military in Iraq. In August 2005, Sheehan set up 
camp near US President George Bush's ranch in Texas, demanding Bush 
explain what "noble cause" her son had died for. Sheehan was a guest 
at the WSF.

Millard said that the "whole time Cindy was in Crawford ... I was in 
Iraq. I followed Cindy's press reports really closely over there." He 
told GLW, "We had a huge contingent of Iraq Veterans Against the War 
there with her ... at Crawford ... She lost her son. We think of her 
as our mother. For god's sake, for any one of us, she could be our 
own mom.

"My mom could be standing there at Crawford, so that when I give 
[Cindy] a hug, she's my mother for that moment. [Sheehan] acts on 
behalf of all mothers so they don't have to go through all this 
grief. In a way, she sees herself as our mom, so even though I only 
met her three days ago, she is one of the most kind and wonderful 
women I have met in years."

Back in the US, Millard explained, he had to "fight for press 
coverage in my local town of Buffalo". In contrast, at the Caracas 
WSF, "I just sit in an area and they line up to talk to me. Our media 
doesn't tell people there are Veterans for Peace and Veterans Against 
the War. They say that our veterans are flag-waving, country-loving 
Americans, who would put a boot in your arse for the nation.

"In reality, Veterans for Peace is a huge organisation. Our veterans 
have seen the war, are fed up with war ..."

"We've been there", he explained. "We've been under fire, we take the 
mortar attacks, the gunshots. We have members who are in wheelchairs 
because they were shot in the back. We've got members who've got PTSD 
so crippling they can't make it through the day. They commit suicide. 
We know the struggle of the Iraqi people, because we know what they 
are going through."

Millard favourably contrasted Venezuela's left-wing president, Hugo 
Chavez, to Bush. "[Chavez] made references to Noam Chomsky [in his 
WSF address]. I found a politician who can read! Unlike our president 
- I wonder if he is a functional illiterate. The man almost died 
eating a pretzel."

Millard didn't agree with everything Chavez said at the WSF, but told 
GLW "this is a man who is starting to look out for the interests of 
his people, who's telling the corporate interests a big 'no'. He's 
saying that my job is for the people first and foremost.

"Imagine if we had a president who said 'no' to McDonald's, 'no' to 
Microsoft, 'no' to Exxon, Haliburton and Bechtel", Millard said. "If 
he said 'yes' to people, 'yes' to poor people, 'yes' to homeless 
people ... where would that leave our society in the US? ...

"As long as the US is a military superpower, the world is going in 
the wrong direction. But the hope of Venezuela is that the people 
from the grassroots level can oppose all that. If they can do it 
here, then we can do it in the USA."

 From Green Left Weekly, June 7, 2006.

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
   cyberjournal forum 
   Achieving real democracy
   for readers of ETM 
   Community Empowerment
   Blogger made easy