US House May Prevent States from Protecting Food Supply

2007-06-04

Richard Moore

--------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 12:11:51 +0100
From: Sanders Research Associates <•••@••.•••>

Subject: SRA: The Heron's Latest Catch: US House May Prevent States from 
Protecting Food Supply

The Heron's Latest Catch
US House May Prevent States from Protecting Food Supply

By: Britt Bailey -- www.gmwatch.org
Date: 01-06-2007

House Subcommittee Approves Language Preempting State & Local Restriction of 
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Other Questionable Foods.The United 
States House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture has begun the process 
of writing the 2007 Farm Bill. Of grave concern is language added and approved 
by the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry that preempts state 
restrictions of foods or agricultural products deregulated by the USDA. The 
added language reads, "no State or locality shall make any law prohibiting the 
use in commerce of an article that the Secretary of Agriculture has inspected 
and passed; or determined to be of non-regulated status."


____________________
Original source URL:
http://www.sandersresearch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1239

US House May Prevent States from Protecting Food Supply

By Britt Bailey -- www.gmwatch.org
May/30/2007

House Subcommittee Approves Language Preempting State & Local Restriction of 
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and Other Questionable Foods.

The United States House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture has begun 
the process of writing the 2007 Farm Bill. Of grave concern is language added 
and approved by the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry that preempts 
state restrictions of foods or agricultural products deregulated by the USDA. 
The added language reads, "no State or locality shall make any law prohibiting 
the use in commerce of an article that the Secretary of Agriculture has 
inspected and passed; or determined to be of non-regulated status."

The preemption language has been traced to Iowa Representative and Subcommittee 
Chair, Leonard Boswell. His intention is to prohibit state and local policies 
banning the sale of products approved by USDA and other regulatory agencies. The
broad scope of the language would affect state and local prohibitions on the 
cultivation of genetically modified crops, bans on the sale of rBGH milk, and 
the outlawing of foie gras for starters.

At a time of pervasive food contamination and consumer displeasure with the 
social, ethical, and environmental aspects of food processes and production, the
addition of a few lines tucked into an immense bill could weaken carefully 
adopted consumer protections.

If the preemption language is adopted into the final Farm Bill, some of the 
state laws that may be affected include:

Genetically Modified Foods:

California and Arkansas are currently debating prohibitions on the growing GMO 
rice. The major rice growing states are concerned after the 2006 announcement 
that several un-approved varieties of engineered rice contaminated rice crops 
resulting in major financial losses for US farmers.

Four California counties and two cities have adopted prohibitions on the growing
of genetically modified crops in order to protect their organic and conventional
foods.

rBGH Milk:

In 2006, Vermont's Agricultural Secretary, Steve Kerr, urged dairy farmers to 
stop using rBGH, or recombinant bovine growth hormone, in dairy cows.

New York City is in the process of considering a ban on the sale of rBGH milk.

*Foie Gras:

On grounds of inhumane treatment, the City of Chicago banned the sale of foie 
gras in restaurants. California has banned the force-feeding of birds to produce
the product, ending the practice by 2012.

In addition, the preemption language raises concerns that states would be barred
from taking action when a food safety threats arise. For example, states could 
be barred from calling for recalls or prohibiting the sale of tainted meats, 
peanut butter, or other foods that have passed USDA inspection. Advocates 
favoring the preemption language include United Egg Producers, National Pork 
Producers, National Milk Producers Federation, and the National Cattleman's Beef
Association.

The Farm Bill will be voted on by the House Committee on Agriculture before 
going to the House floor and then on to the Senate. To take action to oppose 
this disastrous preemption language, send a letter and/or contact:

The House Agricultural Committee, •••@••.•••

Your House Representative, www.house.gov/writerep/ Your Senator, 
www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Stay updated about the 2007 Farm Bill as it moves through the House of 
Representatives, agriculture.house

[Published May 28, 2007]
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------
Posting archives: http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
Escaping the Matrix website: http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website: http://cyberjournal.org

Community Democracy Framework: 
http://cyberjournal.org/DemocracyFramework.html

Subscribe cyberjournal list: •••@••.•••  (send blank
message)

cyberjournal blog (join in): http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)