US army to become foreign mercenaries?


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Military considers recruiting foreigners
Expedited citizenship would be an incentive
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff  |  December 26, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The armed forces, already struggling to meet recruiting goals, are
considering expanding the number of noncitizens in the ranks -- including 
disputed proposals to open recruiting stations overseas and putting more 
immigrants on a faster track to US citizenship if they volunteer -- according to
Pentagon officials.

Foreign citizens serving in the US military is a highly charged issue, which 
could expose the Pentagon to criticism that it is essentially using mercenaries 
to defend the country. Other analysts voice concern that a large contingent of 
noncitizens under arms could jeopardize national security or reflect badly on 
Americans' willingness to serve in uniform.

The idea of signing up foreigners who are seeking US citizenship is gaining 
traction as a way to address a critical need for the Pentagon, while fully 
absorbing some of the roughly one million immigrants that enter the United 
States legally each year.

The proposal to induct more noncitizens, which is still largely on the drawing 
board, has to clear a number of hurdles. So far, the Pentagon has been quiet 
about specifics -- including who would be eligible to join, where the recruiting
stations would be, and what the minimum standards might involve, including 
English proficiency. In the meantime, the Pentagon and immigration authorities 
have expanded a program that accelerates citizenship for legal residents who 
volunteer for the military.

And since Sept. 11, 2001, the number of imm igrants in uniform who have become 
US citizens has increased from 750 in 2001 to almost 4,600 last year, according 
to military statistics.

With severe manpower strains because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- and 
a mandate to expand the overall size of the military -- the Pentagon is under 
pressure to consider a variety of proposals involving foreign recruits, 
according to a military affairs analyst.

"It works as a military idea and it works in the context of American 
immigration," said Thomas Donnelly , a military scholar at the conservative 
American Enterprise Institute in Washington and a leading proponent of 
recruiting more foreigners to serve in the military.

As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan grind on, the Pentagon has warned Congress 
and the White House that the military is stretched "to the breaking point."

Both President Bush and Robert M. Gates, his new defense secretary, have 
acknowledged that the total size of the military must be expanded to help 
alleviate the strain on ground troops, many of whom have been deployed 
repeatedly in combat theaters.

Bush said last week that he has ordered Gates to come up with a plan for the 
first significant increase in ground forces since the end of the Cold War. 
Democrats who are preparing to take control of Congress, meanwhile, promise to 
make increasing the size of the military one of their top legislative priorities
in 2007.

"With today's demands placing such a high strain on our service members, it 
becomes more crucial than ever that we work to alleviate their burden," said 
Representative Ike Skelton , a Missouri Democrat who is set to chair the House 
Armed Services Committee, and who has been calling for a larger Army for more 
than a decade.

But it would take years and billions of dollars to recruit, train, and equip the
30,000 troops and 5,000 Marines the Pentagon says it needs. And military 
recruiters, fighting the perception that signing up means a ticket to Baghdad, 
have had to rely on financial incentives and lower standards to meet their 

That has led Pentagon officials to consider casting a wider net for noncitizens 
who are already here, said Lieutenant Colonel Bryan Hilferty , an Army 

Already, the Army and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement division of the 
Department of Homeland Security have "made it easier for green-card holders who 
do enlist to get their citizenship," Hilferty said.

Other Army officials, who asked not to be identified, said personnel officials 
are working with Congress and other parts of the government to test the 
feasibility of going beyond US borders to recruit soldiers and Marines.

Currently, Pentagon policy stipulates that only immigrants legally residing in 
the United States are eligible to enlist. There are currently about 30,000 
noncitizens who serve in the US armed forces, making up about 2 percent of the 
active-duty force, according to statistics from the military and the Council on 
Foreign Relations. About 100 noncitizens have died in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A recent change in US law, however, gave the Pentagon authority to bring 
immigrants to the United States if it determines it is vital to national 
security. So far, the Pentagon has not taken advantage of it, but the calls are 
growing to take use the new authority.

Indeed, some top military thinkers believe the United States should go as far as
targeting foreigners in their native countries.

"It's a little dramatic," said Michael O'Hanlon , a military specialist at the 
nonpartisan Brookings Institution and another supporter of the proposal. "But if
you don't get some new idea how to do this, we will not be able to achieve an 
increase" in the size of the armed forces.

"We have already done the standard things to recruit new soldiers, including 
using more recruiters and new advertising campaigns," O'Hanlon added.

O'Hanlon and others noted that the country has relied before on sizable numbers 
of noncitizens to serve in the military -- in the Revolutionary War, for 
example, German and French soldiers served alongside the colonists, and locals 
were recruited into US ranks to fight insurgents in the Philippines.

Other nations have recruited foreign citizens: In France, the famed Foreign 
Legion relies on about 8,000 noncitizens; Nepalese soldiers called Gurkhas have 
fought and died with British Army forces for two centuries; and the Swiss Guard,
which protects the Vatican, consists of troops who hail from many nations.

"It is not without historical precedent," said Donnelly, author of a recent book
titled "The Army We Need," which advocates for a larger military.

Still, to some military officials and civil rights groups, relying on large 
number of foreigners to serve in the military is offensive.

The Hispanic rights advocacy group National Council of La Raza has said the plan
sends the wrong message that Americans themselves are not willing to sacrifice 
to defend their country. Officials have also raised concerns that immigrants 
would be disproportionately sent to the front lines as "cannon fodder" in any 

Some within the Army privately express concern that a big push to recruit 
noncitizens would smack of "the decline of the American empire," as one Army 
official who asked not to be identified put it.

Officially, the military remains confident that it can meet recruiting goals -- 
no matter how large the military is increased -- without having to rely on 

"The Army can grow to whatever size the nation wants us to grow to," Hilferty 
said. "National defense is a national challenge, not the Army's challenge."

He pointed out that just 15 years ago, during the Gulf War, the Army had a total
of about 730,000 active-duty soldiers, amounting to about one American in 350 
who were serving in the active-duty Army.

"Today, with 300 million Americans and about 500,000 active-duty soldiers, only 
about one American in 600 is an active-duty soldier," he said. "America did 
then, and we do now, have an all-volunteer force, and I see no reason why 
America couldn't increase the number of Americans serving."

But Max Boot, a national security specialist at the Council on Foreign 
Relations, said that the number of noncitizens the armed forces have now is 
relatively small by historical standards.

"In the 19th century, when the foreign-born population of the United States was 
much higher, so was the percentage of foreigners serving in the military," Boot 
wrote in 2005.

"During the Civil War, at least 20 percent of Union soldiers were immigrants, 
and many of them had just stepped off the boat before donning a blue uniform. 
There were even entire units, like the 15th Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry [the 
Scandinavian Regiment] and General Louis Blenker's German Division, where 
English was hardly spoken."

"The military would do well today to open its ranks not only to legal immigrants
but also to illegal ones and, as important, to untold numbers of young men and 
women who are not here now but would like to come," Boot added.

"No doubt many would be willing to serve for some set period, in return for one 
of the world's most precious commodities -- US citizenship. Some might deride 
those who sign up as mercenaries, but these troops would have significantly 
different motives than the usual soldier of fortune."

Bryan Bender can be reached at •••@••.•••.

© Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy