UK: Officials admit doubts over chemical plot


Richard Moore

Original source URL:,,1790443,00.html

Officials admit doubts over chemical plot

Intelligence behind terror raid questioned as proof remains elusive

Richard Norton-Taylor and Vikram Dodd
Monday June 5, 2006

Counter-terrorism officials conceded yesterday that lethal chemical devices they
feared had been stored at an east London house raided on Friday may never have 

Confidence among officials appeared to be waning as searches at the address 
continued to yield no evidence of a plot for an attack with cyanide or other 
chemicals. A man was shot during the raid, adding to pressure on the authorities
for answers about the accuracy of the intelligence that led them to send 250 
officers to storm the man's family home at dawn.

Officials are not yet prepared to admit the intelligence was wrong. But there is
diminishing optimism that it will be shown to wholly or even partially correct. 
Speaking of the feared chemical devices, one official said: "They might be 
elsewhere or never existed."

The raid, at 4am on Friday, was launched after MI5 received intelligence from an
informant of the existence of a viable chemicial device at the property, which 
was to be used in an attack in Britain with the potential for substantial loss 
of life.

During the raid a 23-year-old Muslim man was shot, and he and his brother were 
arrested on suspicion of terrorism.

Scotland Yard said yesterday that searches at the property would continue for 
several days. Sources with responsibility for the security of the transport 
system, one of the most likely targets of a chemical device, say they have not 
been made aware the searches have produced any trace of a chemical device, 
either at the address in east London or elsewhere. "So far nothing from the 
search bears out the intelligence," said one source.

The Guardian has learned that over the weekend police intensified their planning
for dealing with community anger if it turns out the intelligence was wrong.

Security and intelligence officials yesterday defended the decision to raid the 
house: "We have a duty of care to the general public, we can't do [police 
anti-terrorist] operations by halves," said one official.

A senior police source explained the police's dilemma: "In other crime you can 
take a risk to firm up the intelligence. The trouble with this new world of 
terrorism is you don't have the time, you can't firm up the intelligence to the 
point you like.

"The public may have to get used to this sort of incident, with the police 
having to be safe rather than sorry."

Anti-terrorism police yesterday began questioning the man shot in the raid, 
after his release from hospital. His lawyer named him as Mohammed Abdul Kahar, 
23, who with his brother Abul Koyair, 20, protest their innocence and deny any 
link to Islamist extremism.

Mr Koyair's solicitor, Julian Young, denied media reports that his client had 
any criminal convictions. Lawyers for the men also denied a report that Mr Kahar
had been shot by his brother after grappling with an armed police officer for 
his gun.

Mr Kahar's solicitor, Kate Roxburgh, said the 23-year-old Royal Mail worker had 
been shot in the upper right hand side of his chest, with the bullet exiting 
through his shoulder on an upwards trajectory. She said his brother had been 
standing behind Mr Kahar at the time.

Both solicitors said there had been no struggle before the shot was fired 
without warning, but Ms Roxburgh said Mr Kahar had grabbed the gun after he was 
shot fearing it would be fired again, leaving him with a burn to his hand from 
the hot barrel.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy