Stolen election?

2004-11-04

Richard Moore


--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rense.com/general59/steI.HTM

Fixed - The Stealing Of 
Another Election 
11-3-4 
 

Democratic Underground.com

EarlG (xxx posts) Wed Nov-03-04 02:57 AM

Kerry winning Exit Polls - FRAUD LOOKS PROBABLE

SoCalDem has done a statistical analysis...

...on several swing states, and EVERY STATE that has EVoting
but no paper trails has an unexplained advantage for Bush of
around +5% when comparing exit polls to actual results.

In EVERY STATE that has paper audit trails on their EVoting,
the exit poll results match the actual results reported within
the margin of error.

So, we have MATCHING RESULTS for exit polls vs. voting with
audits

vs.

A 5% unexplained advantage for Bush without audits.

Maybe Dubayah believes God will see him through this, but it's
going to take more than blind faith to pull the wool over the
data and the facts.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 12:42 AM by SoCalDemocrat EDIT:

Analysis of the polling data vs actual data and voting systems
supports the hypothesis that evoting may be to blame in the
discrepancies. Nevada has evoting but with verified receipts.
In that state the Exit Polling matches the actual results
within .1% accuracy. However for other swing states Bush has
unexplainable leads.

I'm still compiling data. Please help me determine what voting
methods are being used in swing states and which are evoting
without audit trails. Post your data under the individual
state responses below.
 
------------------------------------------- 
 
Kerry is well ahead in exit polls, but still losing the counts. WTH is going on?
 
Kerry is well ahead in Exit Polling in Ohio. We're being screwed. 
 
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/O... 
 
Male: 51/49 Kerry 47% 
Female: 53/47 Kerry 53% 
 
Dem: 91/8 Kerry 38% 
Rep: 94/6 Bush 37% 
Ind: 60/39 Kerry 24% 
 
 
Here is exit polling for Florida (3,824,794 votes for Kerry &
Bush)
 
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/F... 
 
Male: 52/47 Kerry 46% 
Female: 52/48 Kerry 54% 
 
Dem: 86/13 Kerry 38% 
Rep: 92/7 Bush 39% 
Ind: 60/38 Kerry 23% 
 
3,824,794 votes for Kerry & Bush 
2065388 Women (54% of total) 
1759405 Men (46% of total) 
 
Bush leads male vote by 5% of M = 87970 
 
Kerry leads female vote by 4% of M = 82615 
 
That means Bush is ahead by just 5355 votes in exit polling in
FL.

Another odd thing is that there are more Reps then Dems in
Florida by 1%, which is not expected. Either there are more
voting Republicans in FL than Democrats, a first and not
matching known statistics, or more Republicans were exit
polled than Democrats. If the exit poll is off by just 1%
that's a difference of 382479 more voters who are Democracts.

The results being posted however show Bush ahead 326,000
actual votes. This is simply not possible from the exit
polling numbers. Even skewed for a 5% higher Republican vs.
Democrat turnout from 2000, it doesn't add up.
 
 
WISCONSIN: 
 
Kerry leads Female voters by 7%, Bush leads male voters by 7%.
Male vs. Female voter turnout is 47% M, 53% F. That means
Kerry statistically has a 7% edge in exit polling in
Wisconsin.

Actual results however show Bush ahead by 1%, an unexplained
difference of 8%.

NEVADA:

Just checked, same pattern. Kerry leads in the exit polls by a
clear margin, but is still behind in the reported results.
This state is even closer. Actual is just 1% favor of Bush.
Exit polls show Kerry with a wider margin. Women favored Kerry
by 8% here out of 52% of total voters. Men favored Bush by
just 6% out of 48% of total voters. Actual reported results
don't match exit polling AT ALL in Nevada.

*** KERRY leads by 1.3% in exit polls in NV ***

Can someone determine what percentage of precincts are DIEBOLD
or electronic voting machines in these swing states? Of those
compare the expected voting results from Male vs. Female
against the results reported by electronic vs. non-electronic
voting places.

My HYPOTHESIS is we will find a discrepancy in the electronic
systems vs. the exit polls and the non-electronic systems.
 
ttp://www.democraticunderground.com 
/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&add 
ress=132x1295396 
 
 
 
How The Election Was Stolen 
 
From Roz Hill 
•••@••.••• 
11-3-4 
 
I watched the election results all night and into this
morning. There are some very important issues to share.

One is the surprise expressed by the pundits wherein they
acknowledge that the massive voter drives were propelled by
discontent. So how did the most hated occupant of the White
House manage to exceed his 45% poll average to now claim he
has a huge "popular" win.

We are told that 22% voted on "morality" and that Bush took
80% of that 22%, and that is how he won. However, that leaves
78% who were focused on Kerry issues. Why aren,t we told the
percentages of the 78%???

The second surprise for the media was that the results didn,t
match the exit polls AT ALL. The media has gracefully claimed
they "just got it wrong." You remember we didn,t have exit
pollsters in 2002. It saved any disagreement with THAT
Republican "sweep." In fact, the pollsters have always been
100% accurate, with just 1 to 2% polling data, in legitimate
elections. Bush took the Texas governorship from Ann Richards
when she had a 70% approval rating. Is it magic?

My "I TOLD YOU SO" is that I have SCREAMED since 2000 that if
we don,t get rid of touch-screen "voting" computers, NOTHING,
NOTHING, NOTHING else will matter.

So, here are the numbers (so far): 112,596,922 voters counted
in the presidential race. Bush has been consistently polling
at 45%, which SHOULD have given him 50,668,614 votes, instead
of 58,073,612. This translates into 7,404,998 votes being
siphoned off from Kerry votes. Now, how does that magic
work???

Taxpayers get hit with a bill for $3600 (or more) for EACH of
the touch-screen "voting" computers, which are nothing more
than dedicated COUNTERS except that they are marketed by
Republicans (who vowed to ensure Bush,s victory); and the
American people have not been allowed to examine or certify
the software in these units.

Here is how easy it is to "make magic" 
 
-- we need COUNTERS - (B) = Bush; (K) = Kerry; (V) = Vote; (T) = Tally 
 
1. If V = B, add 1 to B 
2. If T = 8, add 1 to B; Clear T; Skip 3 
3. If V = K, add 1 to K; Add 1 to T 
 
This extremely simple bit of programming would shift 12% of
the vote from Kerry to Bush, it would defy exit polls, and it
would make it look like Bush had a huge popular win. It is
time that the software in these SECRET Republican-owned
computers be examined with a deliberate check for instructions
that could modify the vote tally.

Al-Qaeda has previously regarded the American people as
victims of a crooked election in 2000. Now they regard
Americans as responsible for letting this man -- who is
regarded as the worst terrorist on the planet continue his
tyrannous regime. I doubt that the rest of the world will
accept four more years of his lies and looting.
 
Roz Hill 
 

MainPage 
http://www.rense.com 

This Site Served   by TheHostPros 
-- 

============================================================
If you find this material useful, you might want to check out our website
(http://cyberjournal.org) or try out our low-traffic, moderated email 
list by sending a message to:
      •••@••.•••

You are encouraged to forward any material from the lists or the website,
provided it is for non-commercial use and you include the source and
this disclaimer.

Richard Moore (rkm)
Wexford, Ireland

"Global Transformation: Whey We Need It And How We Can Achieve It", current 
draft:
    http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/rkmGlblTrans.html
_____________________________
    "...the Patriot Act followed 9-11 as smoothly as the
      suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the
      Reichstag fire."  
      - Srdja Trifkovic

    There is not a problem with the system.
    The system is the problem.

    Faith in ourselves - not gods, ideologies, leaders, or programs.
_____________________________
"Zen of Global Transformation" home page: 
    http://www.QuayLargo.com/Transformation/

QuayLargo discussion forum:
    http://www.QuayLargo.com/Transformation/ShowChat/?ScreenName=ShowThreads

cj list archives:
    http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=cj

newslog list archives:
    http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=newslog
_____________________________
Informative links:
    http://www.indymedia.org/
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/
    http://www.MiddleEast.org
    http://www.rachel.org
    http://www.truthout.org
    http://www.williambowles.info/monthly_index/
    http://www.zmag.org
    http://www.co-intelligence.org
============================================================