Russia: Iran proposal ‘excludes use of force’

2006-06-02

Richard Moore

    
    "I can say unambiguously that all the agreements from
    yesterday's meetings rule out, in any circumstances, the use
    of military force," the Russian foreign minister, Sergei
    Lavrov, was quoted as saying by Moscow's RIA news agency.


--------------------------------------------------------
Original source URL:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1788821,00.html

Iran proposal 'excludes use of force'

Mark Tran and agencies
Friday June 2, 2006
Guardian Unlimited

Russia today said a plan to break the international impasse over Iran's nuclear 
programme excluded the use of military force "in any circumstances".

"I can say unambiguously that all the agreements from yesterday's meetings rule 
out, in any circumstances, the use of military force," the Russian foreign 
minister, Sergei Lavrov, was quoted as saying by Moscow's RIA news agency.

Mr Lavrov's comments followed yesterday's agreement on a package of proposals to
be presented to Tehran.

He said no deadline had been set for Iran to reply to the proposals, which were 
agreed to by foreign ministers from the five permanent members of the UN 
security council and Germany at talks in Vienna.

Details of the package have not yet been made public, meaning the Russian take 
on it cannot be verified.

A British Foreign Office official said he was "perplexed" by Mr Lavrov's 
comments, which are likely to annoy Washington. The Bush administration has 
resisted offering assurances that Iran would not be the target of a military 
attack.

At the moment, the diplomatic chess game has some way to go. In its next move, 
the EU foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, is expected to deliver the offer to 
Tehran.

The foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett, last night said Iran would be offered 
the opportunity to reach agreement with the international community through 
negotiation and cooperation.

However, she warned it could expect "further steps" to be taken by the UN 
security council if it refused to come to the negotiating table.

"We are prepared to resume negotiations should Iran resume suspension of all 
enrichment and reprocessing activities, as required by the International Atomic 
Energy Agency, and we would also suspend action in the security council," she 
said.

"We have also agreed that, if Iran decides not to engage in negotiation further,
steps would have to be taken in the security council.

"So there are two paths ahead. We urge Iran to take the positive path and 
consider seriously our substantive proposals, which would bring significant 
benefits to Iran. We will now be talking to the Iranians about our proposals."

The package set to be presented to Tehran is believed to include an offer to 
help build a light-water nuclear reactor.

That is considered less of a threat than Tehran's uranium enrichment programme -
a process that can produce material for use in nuclear weapons.

If Iran rejects the offer, the US, Britain and France would return to the UN 
security council to table a resolution setting a deadline for it to suspend 
uranium enrichment or face sanctions.

These would include a ban on arms sales, no transfer of nuclear technology, no 
visas for Iranian leaders and officials and a freeze on Iranian assets.

Iran has insisted on its "natural right" to enrich uranium for peaceful 
purposes, and has rejected a Washington offer to hold talks on the condition 
that it suspends enrichment.

Meanwhile, John Negroponte, the head of US intelligence, said Iran could have a 
nuclear bomb within 10 years.

"We don't have a clear-cut knowledge, but the estimate we have made is [that] 
some time between the beginning of the next decade and the middle of the next 
decade they might be in a position to have a nuclear weapon, which is a cause of
great concern," Mr Negraponte said.

"At the moment, there's an initiative on the table with respect to Iran, and we 
will have to watch the government of Iran's reaction to that. In the meanwhile, 
we have to recognise that they are the principal state sponsor of terrorism in 
the world."

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2006
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------
Escaping the Matrix website     http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website            http://cyberjournal.org
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives                http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
Blogs:
  cyberjournal forum            http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/
  Achieving real democracy      http://harmonization.blogspot.com/
  for readers of ETM            http://matrixreaders.blogspot.com/
  Community Empowerment http://empowermentinitiatives.blogspot.com/
  Blogger made easy             http://quaylargo.com/help/ezblogger.html