-------------------------------------------------------- From: •••@••.••• Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 11:10:48 EDT Subject: Re: rkm commentary To: •••@••.••• rkm> They probably dream of themselves as the undisputed masters of a post-apocalyptic world, cleansed of excess population and culled of unfavored races, a world all cleared away and in dire need of reconstruction, via Halliburton and ilk. Beautifully written and right on the money! I will disperse widely, thanks. Frank ------- Hi Frank, Thanks - forwarding is encouraged, and remember to include my address & cj website (http://cyberjournal.org). rkm -------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 22:04:40 -0700 From: Chris Shaw <•••@••.•••> Reply-To: Chris Shaw <•••@••.•••> To: •••@••.••• Subject: Re: rkm commentary I may not be famous enough, but I'm pretty well known in some of the subfields of neuroscience. Let me know if you want me to be a commentator. Chris ------ Chris (and others), The book is intended for everyone, so blurbs from "ordinary people", scientists, or whatever, are appropriate. If I do get a "fame name" or two, that will be a bonus. cheers, rkm -------------------------------------------------------- From: "Robert E. Reynolds" <•••@••.•••> To: <•••@••.•••> Subject: Re: rkm commentary Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 09:26:26 -0400 great piece!. There is a global population decrease belief in some groups. disease is one method, and war and devastation another. A nuclear war would certainly combine the two methods very effectively. -------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 08:06:38 -0700 To: •••@••.••• From: Dan Brook <•••@••.•••> Subject: Re: rkm commentary "when they blew up the World Trade Center" - this is the kind of statement that can't stand on its own without sufficient context and explanation because it goes against common understanding -------- Hi Dan, In this case, the context is this list. I've published or written dozens of analyses, from various perspectives, which in my opinion conclusively establish that the operation was planned and carried out as a covert operation. Not all subscribers may concur with my conclusions, but they are likely to understand that my claim is really a placeholder for previous postings, not just an idle opinion. I'm sure you agree with the principle that we don't want the regime to control language, or to control the scope of our discourse. And yet, even in trying to escape from the box of regime framings, we often are bound by it. So much of liberal analysis is pointing out contradictions in the regime line, and never gets beyond that. It's like they're beating their heads against the regime's box, never escaping, hoping vainly that they'll eventually demolish the wall. What I like to do in my analysis is move on to the "What Next?" questions, to fly outside the box. All the evidence points to the neocons as perps, so let's not dwell on that. Let's take that as a starting point and see what it tells us about what they might do in the future. Such analysis may not be meaningful to all audiences, but it's a kind of analysis that needs to be pursued, at least in places like this. cheers, rkm -------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 11:08:16 -0700 From: Janet McFarland <•••@••.•••> To: •••@••.••• Subject: Re: rkm commentary Hi Richard, I just thought I'd share about something wonderful happening in my life. I have a large yard which is largely grown up in weeds, in spite of various whole and half-hearted efforts over the years to establish something there. A lovely group called City Slicker Farms is going to add my yard to their urban farming patches. They will grow organic vegetables there for distribution to low-income residents of West Oakland. We'll have a big workday in May and together we'll name the new garden. Perhaps it will be the Garden of Eatin', a version of my original sense of the place as a kind of Eden waiting restoration to it's native beauty and wholeness. I am grateful for all these small connections being knitted together all around the world. Our web of existence which makes every day we have something to cherish. xo Janet ------- Hi Janet! That does sound wonderful. Such synergy - everyone benefits, good spiritual energy. rkm -- ============================================================ If you find this material useful, you might want to check out our website (http://cyberjournal.org) or try out our low-traffic, moderated email list by sending a message to: •••@••.••• You are encouraged to forward any material from the lists or the website, provided it is for non-commercial use and you include the source and this disclaimer. Richard Moore (rkm) Wexford, Ireland "Escaping The Matrix - Global Transformation: WHY WE NEED IT, AND HOW WE CAN ACHIEVE IT ", old draft: http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/rkmGlblTrans.html _____________________________ "...the Patriot Act followed 9-11 as smoothly as the suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the Reichstag fire." - Srdja Trifkovic There is not a problem with the system. The system is the problem. Faith in ourselves - not gods, ideologies, leaders, or programs. _____________________________ cj list archives: http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=cj newslog list archives: http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?lists=newslog _____________________________ Informative links: http://www.indymedia.org/ http://www.globalresearch.ca/ http://www.greenleft.org.au/index.htm http://www.MiddleEast.org http://www.rachel.org http://www.truthout.org http://www.williambowles.info/monthly_index/ http://www.zmag.org http://www.co-intelligence.org ============================================================