Original source URL: http://nafeez.blogspot.com/2006/09/censored-ny-times-terror-plot-expose.html FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 01, 2006 CENSORED: The NY Times "Terror Plot" Expose They Don't Want You to Read This is a special post for my fellow Brits. On 28th August 2006, the New York Times printed an investigative story on that month¹s 10/8 ³terror plot², undermining the claims of US and British government officials, and suggesting that details had been exaggerated beyond all proportion for political reasons. The article was also published online. But interested British readers quickly discovered that they had been denied access to the article. Instead they discovered the following web message: ³This Article Is Unavailable On advice of legal counsel, this article is unavailable to readers of nytimes.com in Britain. This arises from the requirement in British law that prohibits publication of prejudicial information about the defendants prior to trial.² Even printed copies of the newspaper destined for the UK were scrubbed. Apparently for strictly legal reasons. In fact, the New York Times¹ decision to self-censor its own expose from the British readership is, like the ³terror plot² itself, more likely to have been based on reasons of political expedience. Consider, for instance, the confident declaration of Paul Stephenson, deputy chief of the Metropolitan Police in London, that the goal of the apprehended suspects in plotting the attack was ³mass murder on an unimaginable scale.² Prejudicial to the case Mr. Stephenson? In similar vein, on the very day of the arrests, other officials estimated that as many as 10 planes were to be blown up, possibly over American cities. In Britain, the threat level was raised to its highest, ³critical², signalling an imminent terrorist attack, while Home Secretary Dr. John Reid talked repeatedly of the likelihood of an immediate strike. Such pronouncements were repeated in the US. Michael Chertoff, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said that the plot was ³getting really quite close to the execution stage.² Let¹s be clear on this. These were not qualified, tentative descriptions of suspicions about a possible plot. These were definitive, unqualified proclamations about having detected and successfully foiled an imminent al-Qaeda strike to blow up about 10 civilian planes using liquid explosives to be manufactured on board. So much so that Dr. Reid was rebuked by the Attorney-General for possibly prejudicing the trial of the arrested individuals. Possibly? My own research of public record sources published Monday 21st August, ³The Truth about the ŒTerror Plot¹Š and the new pseudo-terrorism², fundamentally undermines the official narrative. My findings, like that of the NY Times article, do not prejudice any trial -- but they do prejudice the standards of political convenience adopted by British and American officials, whereby their repeated distortions, exaggerations and outright fabrications about the "terror plot" have been used to justify government attempts to push for suspension of sections of the Human Rights Act 1998, and to drastically increase draconian anti-terror powers. For this reason, publication of the latest evidence undermining the government¹s prejudicial claims serves not to create further prejudice, but to correct the lies and distortions that have already been widely disseminated and swallowed whole by an increasingly pathetic and subservient media, that remains unable to learn from the pattern of deceit long established in examples like the non-existent ³Ricin Plot² (as former British Ambassador Craig Murray says, ³there was no ricin; and there was no plot²). What the new evidence, indeed, demonstrates quite clearly, is that the British government, deliberately, consciously, pretended that there was an imminent threat from a plot which, it knew all too well, barely existed. Therefore, for reasons of urgent public interest and in order to help correct the prejudicial distortions printed and aired repeatedly by the media on the basis of the false statements of our purported political representatives, I am posting the New York Times article in full, online, for the first time (see Annex below). And I would urge you all to re-post everywhere you can. A number of points within the article, however, are worth highlighting. The New York Times points out, for instance, that according to ³five senior British officialsŠ the suspects were not prepared to strike immediately. Instead, the reactions of Britain and the United States in the wake of the arrests of 21 people on Aug. 10 were driven less by information about a specific, imminent attack than fear that other, unknown terrorists might strike.² Unfortunately, this ³fear² also had little basis in actual evidence. Consider the fact that ³British officials said the suspects still had a lot of work to do. Two of the suspects did not have passports, but had applied for expedited approval.² One of the men had apparently looked up airline schedules for flights from London to the US (a crime for any British Muslim?), but investigators confirmed that ³the suspects had neither made reservations nor purchased plane tickets.² Supposed ³bomb-making equipment² described blandly as ³chemicals² and ³electrical components² (meaning household products and MP3 players) was found ³five days after the arrests,² not before. ³In fact,² continues the NY Times, ³two and a half weeks since the inquiry became public, British investigators have still not determined whether there was a target date for the attacks or how many planes were to be involved. They say the estimate of 10 planes was speculative and exaggerated.² Speculative and exaggerated is a rather polite term, some might say. ³In his first public statement after the arrests, Peter Clarke, chief of counterterrorism for the Metropolitan Police, acknowledged that the police were still investigating the basics: Œthe number, destination and timing of the flights that might be attacked.¹² So what did they know about this alleged plot? Not very much really. Here we get to the really ³prejudicial² part. ³Despite the charges, officials said they were still unsure of one critical question: whether any of the suspects was technically capable of assembling and detonating liquid explosives while airborne.² In my 21st August analysis, I had already raised fatal questions about the technical viability of the ³terror plot² scenario. So did, apparently, ³a chemist involved in that part of the inquiry, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was sworn to confidentiality.² Thus while officials and experts are cited as generally agreeing that ³the investigation points to a serious and determined group of plotters², they also add that ³questions about the immediacy and difficulty of the suspected bombing plot cast doubt on the accuracy of some of the public statements made at the time.² So perhaps some of these people were extremists, possibly involved in criminal activity, possibly up to no good -- but the ³terror plot² scenario remains fundamentally questionable. As Michael A. Sheehan, the former deputy commissioner of counterterrorism in the New York Police Department told America's newspaper of record: ³In retrospect, there may have been too much hyperventilating going on.² Hyperventilating is not quite the word I would use. ³Bullshitting², appears to be a more fitting, if less polite, description. Also consistent with what I wrote more than a week ago, the NY Times quoted British officials saying ³many of the questions about the suspected plot remained unanswered because they were forced to make the arrests before Scotland Yard was ready.² I had already noted that the Brits didn¹t want to move on the suspects due to the paucity of evidence. ³The trigger was the arrest in Pakistan of Rashid Rauf, a 25-year-old British citizen with dual Pakistani citizenship, whom Pakistani investigators have described as a Œkey figure¹ in the plot.² But Rauf had been tortured by Pakistani interrogators, according to the Pakistani Human Rights Commission. Which means the central source for the details about the plot are inadmissible by law. ³Several senior British officials said the Pakistanis arrested Rashid Rauf without informing them first². What the Times doesn¹t mention is that the impetus for the Pakistanis to move came from the Americans. ³The arrest surprised and frustrated investigators here who had wanted to monitor the suspects longer, primarily to gather more evidence and to determine whether they had identified all the people involved in the suspected plot.² Our boys in the police and intelligence services, in other words, saw no reason to do anything. But the Americans did. And in doing so, they compromised an ongoing intelligence operation, just so they could manufacture a false ³intelligence success². It seems, moreover, that our government didn¹t only lie to its people. It also lied to its friends. ³The plotters received a very short message to ŒGo now,¹ ² Franco Frattini, the European Union¹s security commissioner, told the NY Times. He had been briefed by Dr. Reid. ³I was convinced by British authorities that this message exists², he said. The message, folks, didn¹t exist. ³A senior British official said the message from Pakistan was not that explicit², reported the NY Times. In other words, it didn't say 'Go now'. It said something else, far more ambiguous. But that didn't stop Dr. Reid from telling everybody the opposite. Meanwhile, ³Mr. Reid and Mr. Clarke declined repeated requests for interviews.² What a surprise. Two weeks after they had chorused a story of an imminent strike creating death on an unprecedented scale even worse than 9/11, ³senior officials here [in the US] characterized the remarks as unfortunate.² Most people, I fear, would characterise those remarks in more damning terms. Has anyone, by the way, noted the frequency with which anonymous British officials have been sourced for this story? Are they all in contempt of court for showing that the government¹s claims were untrue, for attempting to correct the public record? I don¹t think so. And that¹s why I post the entire story for you. Read at your perilŠ. ============================== ANNEX August 28, 2006 -- The New York Times Details Emerge in British Terror Case By DON VAN NATTA Jr., ELAINE SCIOLINO and STEPHEN GREYLONDON, Aug. 27 ‹ On Aug. 9, in a small second-floor apartment in East London, two young Muslim men recorded a video justifying what the police say was their suicide plot to blow up trans-Atlantic planes: revenge against the United States and its ³accomplices,² Britain and the Jews. ³As you bomb, you will be bombed; as you kill, you will be killed,² said one of the men on a ³martyrdom² videotape, whose contents were described by a senior British official and a person briefed about the case. The young man added that he hoped God would be ³pleased with us and accepts our deed.² As it happened, the police had been monitoring the apartment with hidden video and audio equipment. Not long after the tape was recorded that day, Scotland Yard decided to shut down what they suspected was a terrorist cell. That action set off a chain of events that raised the terror threat levels in Britain and the United States, barred passengers from taking liquids on airplanes and plunged air traffic into chaos around the world. The ominous language of seven recovered martyrdom videotapes is among new details that emerged from interviews with high-ranking British, European and American officials last week, demonstrating that the suspects had made considerable progress toward planning a terrorist attack. Those details include fresh evidence from Britain¹s most wide-ranging terror investigation: receipts for cash transfers from abroad, a handwritten diary that appears to sketch out elements of a plot, and, on martyrdom tapes, several suspects¹ statements of their motives.But at the same time, five senior British officials said, the suspects were not prepared to strike immediately. Instead, the reactions of Britain and the United States in the wake of the arrests of 21 people on Aug. 10 were driven less by information about a specific, imminent attack than fear that other, unknown terrorists might strike. The suspects had been working for months out of an apartment that investigators called the ³bomb factory,² where the police watched as the suspects experimented with chemicals, according to British officials and others briefed on the evidence, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, citing British rules on confidentiality regarding criminal prosecutions. In searches during raids, the police discovered what they said were the necessary components to make a highly volatile liquid explosive known as HMTD, jihadist materials, receipts of Western Union money transfers, seven martyrdom videos made by six suspects and the last will and testament of a would-be bomber, senior British officials said. One of the suspects said on his martyrdom video that the ³war against Muslims² in Iraq and Afghanistan had motivated him to act. Investigators say they believe that one of the leaders of the group, an unemployed man in his 20¹s who was living in a modest apartment on government benefits, kept the key to the alleged ³bomb factory² and helped others record martyrdom videos, the officials said.Hours after the police arrested the 21 suspects, police and government officials in both countries said they had intended to carry out the deadliest terrorist attack since Sept. 11. Later that day, Paul Stephenson, deputy chief of the Metropolitan Police in London, said the goal of the people suspected of plotting the attack was ³mass murder on an unimaginable scale.² On the day of the arrests, some officials estimated that as many as 10 planes were to be blown up, possibly over American cities. Michael Chertoff, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, described the suspected plot as ³getting really quite close to the execution stage.² But British officials said the suspects still had a lot of work to do. Two of the suspects did not have passports, but had applied for expedited approval. One official said the people suspected of leading the plot were still recruiting and radicalizing would-be bombers. While investigators found evidence on a computer memory stick indicating that one of the men had looked up airline schedules for flights from London to cities in the United States, the suspects had neither made reservations nor purchased plane tickets, a British official said. Some of their suspected bomb-making equipment was found five days after the arrests in a suitcase buried under leaves in the woods near High Wycombe, a town 30 miles northwest of London. Another British official stressed that martyrdom videos were often made well in advance of an attack. In fact, two and a half weeks since the inquiry became public, British investigators have still not determined whether there was a target date for the attacks or how many planes were to be involved. They say the estimate of 10 planes was speculative and exaggerated. In his first public statement after the arrests, Peter Clarke, chief of counterterrorism for the Metropolitan Police, acknowledged that the police were still investigating the basics: ³the number, destination and timing of the flights that might be attacked.² A total of 25 people have been arrested in connection with the suspected plot. Twelve of them have been charged. Eight people were charged with conspiracy to commit murder and preparing acts of terrorism. Three people were charged with failing to disclose information that could help prevent a terrorist act, and a 17-year-old male suspect was charged with possession of articles that could be used to prepare a terrorist act. Eight people still in custody have not been charged. Five have been released. All the suspects arrested are British citizens ranging in age from 17 to 35.Despite the charges, officials said they were still unsure of one critical question: whether any of the suspects was technically capable of assembling and detonating liquid explosives while airborne. A chemist involved in that part of the inquiry, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was sworn to confidentiality, said HMTD, which can be prepared by combining hydrogen peroxide with other chemicals, ³in theory is dangerous,² but whether the suspects ³had the brights to pull it off remains to be seen.²While officials and experts familiar with the case say the investigation points to a serious and determined group of plotters, they add that questions about the immediacy and difficulty of the suspected bombing plot cast doubt on the accuracy of some of the public statements made at the time.³In retrospect,¹¹ said Michael A. Sheehan, the former deputy commissioner of counterterrorism in the New York Police Department, ³there may have been too much hyperventilating going on.² Some of the suspects came to the attention of Scotland Yard more than a year ago, shortly after four suicide bombers attacked three subway trains and a double-decker bus in London on July 7, 2005, a coordinated attack that killed 56 people and wounded more than 700. The investigation was dubbed ³Operation Overt.¹¹ The Police Are Tipped OffThe police were apparently tipped off by informers. One former British counterterrorism official, who was working for the government at the time, said several people living in Walthamstow, a working-class neighborhood in East London, alerted the police in July 2005 about the intentions of a small group of angry young Muslim men. Walthamstow is best known for its faded greyhound track and the borough of Waltham Forest, where more than 17,000 Pakistani immigrants live in the largest Pakistani enclave in London. Armed with the tips, MI5, Britain¹s domestic security services, began an around-the-clock surveillance operation of a dozen young men living in Walthamstow ‹ bugging their apartments, tapping their phones, monitoring their bank transactions, eavesdropping on their Internet traffic and e-mail messages, even watching where they traveled, shopped and took their laundry, according to senior British officials. The initial focus of the investigation was not about possible terrorism aboard planes, but an effort to see whether there were any links between the dozen men and the July 7 subway bombers, or terrorist cells in Pakistan, the officials said. The authorities quickly learned the identity of the man believed to have been the leader of the cell, the unemployed man in his mid-20¹s, who traveled at least twice within the past year to Pakistan, where his activities are still being investigated. Last June, a 22-year-old Walthamstow resident, who is among the suspects arrested Aug. 10, paid $260,000 cash for a second-floor apartment in a house on Forest Road, according to official property records. The authorities noticed that six men were regularly visiting the second-floor apartment that came to be known as the ³bomb factory,² according to a British official and the person briefed about the case.Two of the men, who were likely the bomb-makers, were conducting a series of experiments with chemicals, said the person briefed on the case. MI5 agents secretly installed video and audio recording equipment inside the apartment, two senior British officials said. In a secret search conducted before the Aug. 10 raids, agents had discovered that the inside of batteries had been scooped out, and that it appeared several suspects were doing chemical experiments with a sports drink named Lucozade and syringes, the person with knowledge of the case said. Investigators have said they believe that the suspects intended to bring explosive chemicals aboard planes inside sports drink bottles. In that apartment, according to a British official, one of the leaders and a man in his late 20¹s met at least twice to discuss the suspected plot, as MI5 agents secretly watched and listened. On Aug. 9, just hours before the police raids occurred in 50 locations from East London to Birmingham, the two men met again to discuss the suspected plot and record a martyrdom video.As one of the men read from a script before a videocamera, he recited a quotation from the Koran and ticked off his reasons for the ³action that I am going to undertake,² according to the person briefed on the case. The man said he was seeking revenge for the foreign policy of the United States, and ³their accomplices, the U.K. and the Jews.² The man said he wanted to show that the enemies of Islam would never win this ³war.² Beseeching other Muslims to join jihad, he justified the killing of innocent civilians in America and other Western countries because they supported the war against Muslims through their tax dollars. They were too busy enjoying their Western lifestyles to protest the policies, he added. Though British officials usually release little information about continuing investigations, Scotland Yard took the unusual step of disclosing some detailed information about the investigation last Monday, when the suspects were charged. A Trove of Evidence ³There have been 69 searches,² Mr. Clarke, the chief antiterrorist police official from Scotland Yard, said Monday. ³These have been in houses, flats and business premises, vehicles and open spaces.²Investigators also seized more than 400 computers, 200 mobile phones and 8,000 items like memory sticks, CD¹s and DVD¹s. ³The scale is immense,² Mr. Clarke said. ³Inquiries will span the globe.² He said those searches revealed a trove of evidence, and officials and others last week provided additional details. Four of the law firms that are defending suspects declined to comment.When police officers knocked down the door to the second-floor apartment on Forest Road, they found a plastic bin filled with liquid, batteries, nearly a dozen empty drink bottles, rubber gloves, digital scales and a disposable camera that was leaking liquid, the person with knowledge of the case said. The camera might have been a prototype for a device to smuggle chemicals on the plane. In the pocket of one of the suspects, the police found the computer memory stick that showed he had looked up airline schedules for flights from London to the United States, a British official said. The man is said to have had a diary that included a list that the police interpreted as a step-by-step plan for an attack. The items included batteries and Lucozade bottles. It also included a reminder to select a date. In the homes of a number of the suspects, the police found jihadist literature and DVD¹s about ³genocide² in Iraq and Palestine, according to British officials. In one house searched by the police in Walthamstow, the authorities found a copy of a book called ³Defense of the Muslim Lands.²A ³last will and testament² for one of the accused was said to have been found at his brother¹s home. Dated Sept. 24, 2005, the will concludes, ³What should I worry when I die a Muslim, in the manner in which I am to die, I go to my death for the sake of my maker.² God, he added, can if he wants ³bless limbs torn away!!!² Looking for Global Ties In addition, the British authorities are scouring the evidence for clues to whether there is a global dimension to the suspected plot, particularly the extent to which it was planned, financed or supported in Pakistan, and whether there is a connection to remnants of Al Qaeda. They are still trying to determine who provided the cash for the apartment and the computer equipment and telephones, officials said. Several of the suspects had traveled to Pakistan within weeks of the arrests, according to an American counterterrorism official. At a minimum, investigators say at least one of the suspects¹ inspiration was drawn from Al Qaeda. One of the suspects¹ ³kill-as-they-kill² martyrdom video was taken from a November 2002 fatwa by Osama bin Laden. British officials said many of the questions about the suspected plot remained unanswered because they were forced to make the arrests before Scotland Yard was ready.The trigger was the arrest in Pakistan of Rashid Rauf, a 25-year-old British citizen with dual Pakistani citizenship, whom Pakistani investigators have described as a ³key figure² in the plot. In 2000, Mr. Rauf¹s father founded Crescent Relief London, a charity that sent money to victims of last October¹s earthquake in Pakistan. Several suspects met through their involvement in the charity, a friend of one of them said. Last week, Britain froze the charity¹s bank accounts and opened an investigation into possible ³terrorist abuse of charitable funds.² Leaders of the charity have denied the allegations.Several senior British officials said the Pakistanis arrested Rashid Rauf without informing them first. The arrest surprised and frustrated investigators here who had wanted to monitor the suspects longer, primarily to gather more evidence and to determine whether they had identified all the people involved in the suspected plot. But within hours of Mr. Rauf¹s arrest on Aug. 9 in Pakistan, British officials heard from intelligence sources that someone connected to him had tried to contact some of the suspects in East London. The message was interpreted by investigators as a possible signal to move forward with the plot, officials said.³The plotters received a very short message to ŒGo now,¹ ² said Franco Frattini, the European Union security commissioner, who was briefed by the British home secretary, John Reid, in London. ³I was convinced by British authorities that this message exists.² A senior British official said the message from Pakistan was not that explicit. But, nonetheless, investigators here had to change their strategy quickly. ³The aim was to keep this operation going for much longer,² said a senior British security official who requested anonymity because of confidentiality rules. ³It ended much sooner than we had hoped.² From then on, the British government was driven by worst-case scenarios based on a minimum-risk strategy. British investigators worried that word of Mr. Rauf¹s arrest could push the London suspects to destroy evidence and to disperse, raising the possibility they would not be able to arrest them all. But investigators also could not rule out that there could be an unknown second cell that would try to carry out a similar plan, officials said.Mr. Clarke, as the country¹s top antiterrorism police official in London with authority over police decisions, ordered the arrests. But it was left to Mr. Reid, who has been home secretary since May and is a former defense secretary, to decide at emergency meetings of police, national security and transport leaders, what else needed to be done. Mr. Reid and Mr. Clarke declined repeated requests for interviews.Prime Minister Tony Blair was on vacation in Barbados, where he was said to have monitored events in London; Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott did not attend the meeting. ³While the arrests were unfolding, the Home Office raised Britain¹s terror alert level to ³critical,² as the police continued their raids of suspects¹ homes and cars. All liquids were banned from carry-on bags, and some public officials in Britain and the United States said an attack appeared to be imminent. In addition to Mr. Stephenson¹s remark that the attack would have been ³mass murder on an unimaginable scale,² Mr. Reid said that attacks were ³highly likely² and predicted that the loss of life would have been on an ³unprecedented scale.²Two weeks later, senior officials here characterized the remarks as unfortunate. As more information was analyzed and the British government decided that the attack was not imminent, Mr. Reid sought to calm the country by backing off from his dire predictions, while defending the decision to raise the alert level to its highest level as a precaution. In lowering the threat level from critical to severe on Aug. 14, Mr. Reid acknowledged: ³Threat level assessments are intelligence-led. It is not a process where scientific precision is possible. They involve judgments.² Reporting for this article was contributed by William J. Broad from New York, Carlotta Gall from Pakistan, David Johnston and Mark Mazzetti from Washington. POSTED BY NAFEEZ MOSADDEQ AHMED AT 8:42 PM -- -------------------------------------------------------- Escaping the Matrix website http://escapingthematrix.org/ cyberjournal website http://cyberjournal.org subscribe cyberjournal list mailto:•••@••.••• Posting archives http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/ Blogs: cyberjournal forum http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/ Achieving real democracy http://harmonization.blogspot.com/ for readers of ETM http://matrixreaders.blogspot.com/ Community Empowerment http://empowermentinitiatives.blogspot.com/ Blogger made easy http://quaylargo.com/help/ezblogger.html
