Noam Chomsky: devil or angel?


Richard Moore

This is a very interesting article, not that I necessarily
agree with everything Abrahamson has to say. His analysis of
Chomsky deserves to be considered seriously, but perhaps more
interesting is the author's perspective on global elites and
their agendas, which he outlines as he draws together his
indictment of Chomsky.



Noam Chomsky - Controlled 
Asset Of The New 
World Order 
By Daniel L. Abrahamson 
"Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the
evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge.
Furthermore, he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are
"nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never
mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating
the cycle of debt.  Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a
rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was
killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the
obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur..."

  Noam Chomsky is often hailed as America's premier dissident
intellectual, a fearless purveyor of truth fighting against
media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the
crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.

He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist
students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over
his dense books as if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is
the supreme deity, a priestly master whose logic cannot be

However, as one begins to examine the interviews and writings
of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so
vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be
calculated disinformation designed to distract and confuse
honest activists. Since the 1960's, Chomsky has acted as the
premier Left gatekeeper, using his elevated status to cover up
the major crimes of the global elite.

His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame
"America" and "corporations" while failing to examine the
hidden Globalist overclass which pulls the strings, using the
U.S. as an engine of creation and destruction. Then after
pinning all the worlds ills on American imperialism, Chomsky
offers the solution of world government under the United

In his book "The Conspirator's Hierarchy," Dr. John Coleman
named Chomsky as a deep cover CIA agent working to undermine
social protest groups. Certainly Dr. Coleman's claims appear
validated by an honest review of Chomsky's role as a Left

Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence
of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he
claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg
Committee, and Trilateral Commission are "nothing
organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the
Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of

Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization
and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone
assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in
2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good for

What he does advocate is population control, gun control,
support for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty
in favor of a one-world government under the UN. In other
words, the major goals of the New World Order.

Chomsky's role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of
Karl Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which
actually supports the desired solutions of the elite. Marx
pointed out the inequalities and brutality of capitalism and
then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with the
abolition of private property and religion; in other words,
the major goals known of the New World Order.

Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped
by this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and
elitist structures of Marxism-Leninism or the newer
incarnation under Chomsky.

The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at
the Tavistock Institute understand that people are going to
question the inequities of the current economic system. For
example, why is wealth distributed so unequally between
classes and countries? Why are those living in third world
nations allowed to die from preventable diseases and
starvation? Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct
such murderous foreign policy? Why was America attacked on

In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence?
Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what
solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing
the worldwide population?

Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of
re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real
elite manipulation and then quickly pushes his followers into
dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky's hero
status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications
like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The

Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major
funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller
Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur
Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works
alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy
Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all
the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into

The following analysis will show that Chomsky, a deep cover
agent for the New World Order, a master of black propaganda
whose true motives become clear with a sober and honest


Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper in the
aftermath of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth
movement and claiming any suggestions of government complicity
are fabrications. The "radical" Chomsky takes a position so
deeply rooted in denial that it makes the staged 9-11
whitewash commission look like an honest study. He
belligerently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence
proving government foreknowledge and participation in the
crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist movements

"If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the
left, in my opinion: the mainstream would be utterly
delighted. It is highly likely that nothing significant will
be found. And if -- which I very greatly doubt -- something is
found that would quickly send everyone in Washington to the
death chamber, the left is unlikely to emerge triumphant."

In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the
evidence because according to him, none exists. However even
if there is massive evidence, responsible activists should
ignore it because it would be "the end of the Left." Chomsky's
role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even further as he denies each
piece of evidence individually. The following examples should

1) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19
hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a
fabrication. Many of the remaining 12 were trained as U.S. Air
Force bases and CIA-connected Huffman Aviation. Many of the
accused "religious fanatics" acted more like degenerate
contract agents, as they flashed wads of cash, visited strip
clubs, drank profusely, blew cocaine, smoked weed, cavorted
with strippers and had strange meetings in the drug-rich
Florida keys.

Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug
runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many
languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug
dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked
Pakistani intelligence. There remains no photographic evidence
of these supposed hijackers ever getting on the planes
(walking through airport security does not count).
Furthermore, the autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly
hit the Pentagon listed none of the accused hijackers.

Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training
the hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following:

"Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that
everyone in the White House is totally insane. And in my
opinion, that's what they would have had to be to try
something that would have been very likely to turn into an
utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded, would
almost certainly have leaked, so that they would all be facing
the death sentence. Possible, but not likely."

2) What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which
broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001,
NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight
path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart's single engine Lear
in depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel
in 20 minutes.

But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as
hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD.
Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning
like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed
into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and
Virginia. These "mock" drills, designed to give live on 9-11,
helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA,
and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the
CIA, FBI, and NSA's Echelon network.

Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the

"Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having
investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and
diverts people from the really serious issues."

3) How about the document called "Operation Northwoods" signed
off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals
Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These men, sworn to protect the
Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag terrorism in
order to engineer a war with Cuba. Their treasonous plans
included the following:

-  "Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft
could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the
Government of Cuba."

-  "Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots,
the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared
documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be
helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible

-  "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame
Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful
wave of indignation."

This document was discovered in the National Archives and has
been the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others.
It stands as clear evidence that the U.S. government has
designed plans to engineer terrorist attacks and blame them on
foreign enemies. Yet Noam Chomsky does not think the
Northwoods document matters:

"Operation Northwoods example is only one of many reasons for
being skeptical about this: it doesn't even come close, and it
was not carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in history
that even remotely resembles what is being proposed. Of
course, that does not show that the thesis is impossible:
nothing could show that, by definition. And if someone can put
together some evidence and refute the arguments as to why it
is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be worth

Chomsky's role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is
distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of
facing the clear facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and
that al-Qaeda is a real terrorist enemy. When presented with
documented evidence, from living hijacker patsies to the NORAD
stand down, he simply claims it doesn't exist. He resorts to
emotional "they would never do it" appeals in order to deny
the obvious.

Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but
instead is actively engaging in disinformation.

  9-11 Prior Knowledge

Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of
September 11 is one thing, but he goes further, claiming the
government had no prior knowledge of the attacks. Mind you,
this is a position even weaker than Michael Moore's tepid
Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of
prior knowledge.

Chomsky's position is untenable. For a man who prides himself
on science and logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge
mainstream media reports finds him using arguments similar to
Holocaust deniers; one can show them photographs, videos,
testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of proof is
impossible. Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many
government admissions of prior knowledge widely available even
in the 9-11 whitewash commission report. Here is Noam Chomsky
writing on government prior knowledge:

"That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is
flooded, daily, with information of very low credibility. In
retrospect, one can sometimes pick out pieces that mean
something. At the time, that's a virtual impossibility. By
arguments like this we can prove that someone blew up the
White House yesterday."

If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and
NORAD running drills that morning where hijacked jets flew
into buildings in New York, Washington DC and Virginia? Also,
wouldn't the NSA's Echelon network have picked up the chatter?

Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network
exists. This despite the NSA's openly acknowledged ability to
monitor all phone calls, emails and satellite communication
with keyword software which can identify phrases and
immediately begin tracking the communication. This despite
their admitted bases at Fort Meade, with sister sites in the
UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and other unknown

Students of the intelligence world know full well that the
NSA's Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before
the attacks. In fact, the NSA admitted it, saying that on
September 10 agents intercepted calls from hijackers but,
*ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such
admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse
massive prior knowledge at tops levels of the intelligence

What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late
August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about
intelligence groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like
Robert Wright who warned of the flight school trainees? What
about FBI agent John O'Neill's investigation into Al-Qaeda
financing which was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David
Schippers who desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the
impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the
accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in
Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents
like "Rebuilding America's Defenses" call for helpful Pearl
Harbor style attacks?

Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence
proving beyond any reasonable doubt that the U.S. government
had prior knowledge. But Chomsky must deny these, because his
role is to mislead and distract while chastising the 9-11
truth movement.

  CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission

Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers
like Chomsky has been denying the existence of the overclass
which prints the money, funds and manages the wars, ships the
drugs, controls entire industries, and creates the scientific
propaganda which plagues society. Instead they critique
mid-level minions & front corporations while speaking in
glittering generalities.

In the world of Left gatekeepers, the New World Order does not
exist. There are no elite plan for global government. Instead
they paint the picture of a profit-motivated world in which
corporations control the government. But merely blaming
corporations misses the forces which own their assets, manage
their resources, control their board of directors, and pull
their strings.

Chomsky steadfastly denies the role of the Council on Foreign
Relations, Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission in
the creation and management of the wars and poverty he claims
to condemn. When speaking on such "conspiracies," he said the

"It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the Council on
Foreign Relations, all these other things the people are
racing around searching for conspiracy theories about-they're
"nothing" organizations. Of course they're there, obviously
rich people get together and talk to each other, and play golf
with one another, and plan together-that's not a big surprise.
But these conspiracy theories people are putting their
energies into have virtually nothing to do with the way the
institutions actually function."

(Understanding Power, 348)

The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after WW
II, is an organization openly sworn to destroying American
national sovereignty in favor of world government. They have
acted as the de-facto "secret team" in managing U.S. domestic
and foreign policy, orchestrating wars like Vietnam and the
first Gulf War.. Almost all executives in the CIA and State
Department have been members of the CFR, whether it was Dean
Rusk, Allen Dulles and Robert McNamara during Vietnam or
Richard Armitage and George Tenet during the crimes of 9-11.

The CFR has been the dominant roundtable group pushing for a
Panamerican Union by 2010 which would dissolve national
borders and unite Mexico, Canada, and America under a single
currency, with biometric ID cards and GPS-tracked vehicles on
camera-strewn superhighways. How can Chomsky seriously claim
the CFR is a "nothing organization" when their role in
crafting policy is so clear? Whom is he trying to protect in
denying the treasonous goals of the CFR?

Chomsky's stonewalling on the Bilderberg raises even more
suspicions. Since 1954 the Bilderberg has served as the
central brain of the New World Order, the major secret
gathering for Globalist agents from across the globe.
Bilderberg chairmen like Prince Bernhard and David Rockefeller
have pushed for total global government, eugenics population
control, engineering wars, and controlling the worldwide
economy. Top politicians from America and Europe also undergo
a grooming process at the Bilderberg. Bill Clinton went in
1991 as Rockefeller's personal guest, and Tony Blair attended
in 1993 before becoming Prime Minister. John Kerry attended in
2000, and John Edwards did two weeks before becoming the VP
nominee in 2004.

Major members of the media, such as editors from the
Economist, NY Times, Newsweek, Washington Post, US News and
World Report are regular attendees. Yet they rarely, if ever,
mention the proceedings, sworn to secrecy by their globalist

Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major
media outlets like the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning
for a one-world currency, bank, and army. Articles in Reuters
and the Financial Times of London have admitted the existence
of the Bilderberg,

their grooming of politicians, and their secret plans for
world governance. If these mainstream media reporters can
admit the major role of the Bilderberg in shaping world
affairs, why can't Chomsky? Why is he holding back?

Simlarly, how can Chomsky seriously ignore the role of the
Trilateral Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters
David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski? This is the same
Brzezinski who helped direct the first CIA funds to bin Laden,
and in his book Between Two Ages called for a technotronic
society with a microchipped population.

The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to
control the economy through closer European-Japanese-American
cooperation. They operate much like the CFR, counting the
worlds top elites, politicians, corporate executives, and
media barons as members. They have been instrumental in
creating the destructive "free trade" agreements that are
destroying America's economy and national sovereignty in order
to usher in world governance.

Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable
credentials, also links the Trilateral Commission to the
international narcotics trade, the $500 billion-plus racket
from heroin and cocaine alone which helps fund the Globalist's
house of cards.

What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission
a "nothing organization?" Is it because they echo his goal of
a world government? Or are there darker forces at work?

When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence,
Chomsky's claims are exposed as nothing more than spurious
lies and denial.

  Federal Reserve

Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in
America and the Third World, he has never spoken publicly on
the role of the Federal Reserve. Therefore most Leftist
activists are unaware of the role played by this privately
owned bank cartel which prints worthless fiat currency out of
thin air. Since its secret formation at Jekyll Island in 1910,
and subsequent illegal passage during the Wilson
administration, the Federal Reserve has held the American
economy hostage: creating inflation and boom & bust cycles
through managed money supply and interest rates.

Furthermore, every dollar printed is merely debt charged to
the federal government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to
print a $100 bill, the U.S. government fits the bill for the
full $100 to the private Fed.

The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the
Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild interests has eluded the
"radical" Chomsky. Furthermore he does not discuss the proven
role of the Fed in creating recessions and depressions in
order to purchase assets at a fraction of their value.

Chomsky ignores the role of the fiat currency system which
drives down wages, inflates prices, and puts the American
economy under the iron claw of a few elite families. Since the
dollar is the base currency for worldwide trade and the
current economic house of cards, shouldn't these topics be

Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into
his ideology. After all, one of the key planks in the Marxist
and Fabian socialist agenda is a managed central bank in order
to control the economy. Or perhaps Chomsky fears discussion of
the Fed would expose the real hidden hand that runs the world
economy. For him it is easier to blast the front corporations
and low-level grocery boys.

  The CIA

If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11,
should it be any surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the
CIA? When asked about the links between the CIA and bin Laden,
and the CIA's overt support of the Taliban, Chomsky wrote the

"CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate) or
the Taliban (also not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me
remotely relevant."

How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply
ignoring the documented evidence of CIA funding for the
"freedom fighters" known as al-Qaeda, totaling over $6
billion. The cozy CIA/al-Qaeda relationship continued through
the Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling Kosovo
Liberation Army.

What about the meetings between Taliban leaders, oil
executives, and Bush administration officials from January to
August 2001 to discuss building an oil and gas pipeline for
Unocal? Chomsky also denies the mainstream reports from UK and
French newspapers about two top CIA agents meeting with bin
Laden for over ten days in July 2001 while he received
dialysis at the American Hospital in Dubai.

But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique
the CIA, he absolves the agency of any responsibility for its
actions, from Nazi origins via Project Paperclip to heinous
mind control experiments like MK ULTRA. This horrific period
in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in understanding the New
World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who sees
the CIA as an innocent victim of White House orders:.

"Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of a lot of
these conspiracies; we have a ton of information about it, and
as I read the information, the CIA is basically just an
obedient branch of the White House. I mean sure, the CIA has
done things around the world- but as far as we know, it hasn't
done anything on its own.

There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know of any-that
the CIA is some kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on its
own doing things. What the record shows is that the C.I.A. is
just an agency of the White House, which sometimes carries out
operations for which the Executive branch wants what's called
"plausible deniability"; in other words, if something goes
wrong, we don't want it to look like we did, those guys in the
CIA did it, and we can throw some of them to the wolves if we
need to. That's basically the role of the CIA, along with
mostly just a collection of information.

(Chomsky, "Understanding Power")

Like all of Chomsky's claims, this one is based on emotion,
conjecture, and opinion. He does not cite any specifics,
knowing full well that his fawning minions will accept his
word as gospel.

Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat
bureaucrats, acting as grocery boys for their master
President. According to him, the CIA does not carry out secret
projects on their own, and if accused of such, are innocent.

  JFK Assassination/CIA Role

Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone
assassin and magic bullet theory in the assassination of JFK?
From his emergence as a guru of the Left in the late 60's,
Chomsky has belittled anyone researching the anomolies
stemming from the official story and Warren Commission
cover-up. According to him, any examination is a complete
waste of time:

"The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the most striking
case. I mean, you have all these people doing super-scholarly
intensive research, and trying to find out just who talked to
whom, and what's the exact contours were of this supposed
high-level conspiracy - it's all complete nonsense. As soon as
you look into the various theories, they always collapse,
there's just nothing there. But in many places, the left has
just fallen apart on the basis of these sheer cults."

(Chomsky, Understanding Power)

Chomsky's position puts him in the less than 15% of Americans
who believe Oswald was the lone shooter. For such a
self-proclaimed "anarchist" radical, Chomsky's trust in Warren
Commission's official story seems akin to a child's belief in
Santa Claus.

The facts, of course, tell a different story. While far from
perfect man, Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces
that took over after his death. He began withdrawing 5,000 CIA
"advisers" from Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen Dulles and
Richard Bissel; disbanded the CIA and handed over covert
operations to the State Department; ordered the creation of a
silver-backed government currency to break the Federal Reserve
monopoly; turned down the Operation Northwoods plan to
engineer false flag terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and
refused to invade Cuba and launch a full scale nuclear war
during the Missile Crisis, a plan favored by hawks like
General Curtis LeMay.

Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency
because it would expose te shadow government takeover after
his assassination.

What about Chomsky's claims that the CIA never acts as a rogue
elephant? Do they hold up?

  MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip

Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind
control programs known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots.
This program alone shows how the CIA was indeed a rogue
elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of propaganda,
brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.

In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman began a covert plan to
smuggle top Nazi SS officers, scientists, and propagandists
into America. Those same war criminals quickly became the
front line for the postwar U.S. intelligence machine. Reinhard
Gehlen, one of Hitler's top intelligence chiefs, led postwar
European intelligence for the CIA, becoming the darling of
head honcho Allen Dulles.

Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the
Vatican, and sponsored by the CIA, Gehlen set up "rat lines"
which smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi criminals into South
and Central America. Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin
Bormann and Josef Mengele among others owed their freedom to
this program.

Those same men would later aid CIA coups in Angentina, Chile,
Paraguay, Brazil and other countries. After all, they were
veteran experts: early Gehlen projects had included rigging
elections in Italy and France. By 1955, more than 760 German
scientists had been became U.S. citizens, many specializing in
black research projects. This growing cabal of Nazi doctors
found a happy marriage with the control freak elitists
infesting the NSA, CIA, and black operations government.

These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind
control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed
electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the
Nazi labs of Dr. Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like
Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly, Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.

Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian
candidates, used for political assassinations, drug
transportation, espionage, and sabotage. Yet this was not
limited to Sirhan Sirhan.

In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of
pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex
slavery, blackmail, satanic rituals and murder. Known as the
Monarch Project, children were kidnaped from American streets
and foreign nations and then programmed with trauma based mind

Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners,
the homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all
cherry-picked because they were defenseless. Details of this
horrific and still operational program are available in rare
and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier, which
usually fetch over $300 a piece.

Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister
projects? Why does he claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the
White House, when the record proves that Eisenhower and
Kennedy had little, if any knowledge of MK ULTRA? Simply put:
Why is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?

  Elite Child Sex Rings

The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further
mention (although Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice
President Bush was caught having 15 year-old call boy
prostitutes visiting the White House late at night. The credit
cards records to prove it were splashed across the front page
of the Washington Times: "Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry
Ensnares VIP's with Reagan, Bush Sr."

Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided in
his hotel with piano wire before he could testify. Book like
"The Franklin Coverup" by John DeCamp have further proven the
links between the CIA and Army intelligence to the elite sex
slavery rings. Cases of like the "The Finders" in Washington
DC, where customs agents discovered a CIA warehouse full of
child porn and satanic torture, stand as yet further evidence.

In the forrmer Yugloslavia, CIA front company Dyncorp has been
convicted of operating in the human slave trade and using
their C-130's to ship many of the 200,000 women and children
smuggled out every year. Furthermore, mainstream news outlets
have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers assisting the sex trade
in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Balkans.

Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky
has never discussed the elite sex trade. This is an issue so
shocking, so paradigm-altering, that his Leftist followers
would no longer trust their loving mother government, and that
is the last thing Chomsky wants. After all, if the Leftists
knew that top level politicians are actually pedophiles
practicing satanic ritual abuse, they would no longer trust
the savior world government. The absence of Chomsky and the
Left on the suffering of these children speaks volumes about
their true moral character and motives.


Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth
culture and attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the
latter perfected by Dr. Delgado. Adjunct programs like MK
NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on genetically engineered
viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on American
citizens. Common experiments included testing biological
agents and atomic weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally
handicapped, people in subways, and even whole towns; putting
cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and exposing pregnant
women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These
experiments have been documented as continuing into the 1980's
and likely still continue today.

Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because it
would awaken his readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S.
government will murder its own citizens and soldiers, killing
hundreds of thousands of unwitting subjects simply for
political gain. After all, if they would feed radiated
breakfast cereal to thousands of retarded children, would
these same parasitic elites not also kill more than 2,800
Americans on September 11?


Of course, MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It
was around the time of its inception, in the 1950's, that the
U.S. government began adding sodium fluoride to tap water in
massive quantities.. Should we be shocked? After all, the
first people to use the deadly neurotoxin were the Nazis, who
found it pacified the concentration camp prisoners. Now thanks
to imported Nazi doctors helping our friendly neighborhood
CIA, American citizens could enjoy the same privilege as those
in Hitler's camps.

Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride,
nor the lead and arsenic used in water as silent weapons of
pacification. As a scientist, he is apparently uninterested in
sodium fluoride's proven link to cancer, leukemia,
osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.

So, should we be surprised that he never writes about the
deadly poison aspartame found in thousands of products? Or
genetically modified foods and growth hormones which destroy
immune systems while causing blood disorders and swelling of
the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly microwave
radiation leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to
published BBC reports) altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers
which pulse deadly ELF radiation across America?

  Rockefeller Pharma Cartel

The Nazi doctors who didn't end up in American intelligence
found cushy jobs in the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck
and Eli-Lilly. Chomsky never discusses the history of these
firms; nor the Rockefeller control over the American Medical
Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted vaccines and
brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI's
(Prozac, Zoloft, etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin
pills pimped out to helpless children.

These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal
tendencies and added depression to the poor kids gobbling them
like Flintstone's chewables, all at the advice of their
pill-pusher death merchant doctors. Meanwhile Chomsky stays
true to form, ignoring these matters and instead calling for
socialized, Federally-controlled healthcare which would
further subsidize the pharma cartel. This is just another
example of his bait and switch tactics, a sloppy mess of
disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.

  Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative

Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from
psychiatric community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers
and Tavistock Institute, who seek to define every neurosis as
a mental illness in order to push more drugs. Bush has signed
the New Freedom Initiative to forcibly psychologically test
all K-12 students in public schools, screen them for "mental
illnesses," and force the children to take the recommended

This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma cartel, with
GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck and others investing
millions in buy-offs and lobbying. But news of this
extraordinary Stalinist plan never graced the pages of
Chomsky's editorials, nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the
Progressive, and DemocracyNow. Perhaps this is because the New
Freedom Initiative fits into their goal of
government-controlled socialized health care.

The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin's wildest
dreams, is just a small part of the eugenics agenda; a
dominant Globalist goal which Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper
bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky has never written about the
sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor the role of
it's former chief, Dr. Ewen Cameron, the aforementioned MK
ULTRA villain and CIA child programmer.

Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as
population control, abortion legalization, poisonous
vaccinations, and stem cell research find their most vocal
advocates on the far Left of the managed political debate.
Leftist college majors like sociology advocate programs like
parental licensing by the state, state-controlled child care,
and Chinese style childbirth laws with forced sterilization as
a penalty.

Leftists call for more vaccinations in the Third World despite
the admittedly tainted vaccines used by the World Health
Organization and UNICEF. All of this is indicative of an
infiltrated movement, a Left deeply penetrated by Globalist
agents driving activists into unwittingly championing the
Brave New World.

  Population Control

Population control by any means necessary is a major, some
would say the major goal of the New World Order, perhaps even
paramount to their goal of a cashless society control grid
with microchipped slaves. The chief architects of population
control are Bilderberg elitists like David and Nelson
Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Prince Philip, Ted Turner,
Alexander Haig, and Cyrus Vance. Their Malthusian nightmare
requires killing 90% of the "useless eaters" through war,
genetically engineered viruses, and engineered starvation.
Declassified documents like NSM 200 and Global 2000 lay the
plans out with cold precision.

Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such
depopulation methods. In Chomsky's book "Understanding Power,"
a collection of his talks with activists, a crowd member asks
about population control, to which Chomsky responds:

"If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the human
race isn't going to survive much longer...Yeah, population
control is another issue where it doesn't matter if you do it,
everybody has to do it. It's like traffic: I mean you can't
make driving a car survivable by driving well yourself; there
has to be kind of a social contract involved, otherwise it
won't work." (61)

Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral high
ground, but then advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite
roundtable groups like the Bilderberg and Club of Rome. How
can Chomsky claim to be an advocate for the Third World while
simultaneously pushing for the managed murder agenda favored
by Henry Kissinger?"

Gun Control 
Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has
been pushing for unconstitutional gun control agenda through
their publications like The Nation, Z Magazine, The
Progressive, and their internet kin at DemocracyNow! &
Indymedia. It is a great achievement of propaganda when the
supposed radicals "opposing Bush" call for a completely
disarmed American populace and inflated budget for BATF thugs
in ski masks. Chomsky mock s those who support the
Constitutionally endowed right to bear arms. In fact, he says
it doesn't exist:

"It's pretty clear that, taken literally, the Second Amendment
doesn't permit people to have guns. But laws are never taken
literally, including amendments to the Constitution or
constitutional rights. Laws permit what the tenor of the times
interprets them as permitting."

(Secrets, Lies, and Democracy)

Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are a
proper way to respond to government tyranny. He responds as

"As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's
outlandish. First of all, this is not a weak Third World
country. If people have pistols, the government has tanks. If
people get tanks, the government has atomic weapons. There's
no way to deal with these issues by violent force, even if you
think that that's morally legitimate.

Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make
the country more benign. They're going to make it more brutal,
ruthless and destructive. So while one can recognize the
motivation that lies behind some of the opposition to gun
control, I think it's sadly misguided."

(Secrets, Lies and Democracy)

It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian
socialists in the Democratic party. But to have the supposed
"fringe radicals" saying there is no second amendment and
advocating gun seizures is remarkable. And because of
globalist infiltration of the left, this policy once favored
by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and other mass murderers has found a
comfortable home. Hence it has become common to hear activists
protesting the Iraq quagmire while simultaneously calling for
gun control.
Environmental Front Groups 
As masters of propaganda, the Globalists have uses their Left
Gatekeepers to push eugenics and population control as
necessary for the environment. This has been accomplished
through the phony environmental movement and Peak Oil

The Club of Rome, a globalist front group created in 1968,
immediately began calling for population reduction under the
guise of environmentalism. Other fronts like the World
Wildlife Fund, managed by the aforementioned Prince Philip,
vocally push for population control while seizing large swaths
of land for "Mother Earth." Other pet projects such as the
Kyoto Protocol, which would give the UN total control of
energy resources, have floundered.

Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince
Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad
Black, Shell chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain,
Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug dealer Henry

Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real
environmental pollution problems to push for a fascist
takeover by a world government. Much like the ideas discussed
in the Report From Iron Mountain, he uses the threat of global
warming to justify totalitarian control:

"Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse
effects has been way understimated, and that the catastrophic
effects are actually going to set in 10 years from now, and
not 100 years from now or something.

Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today,
we'd probably have a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing
to it, because that would be the only method for survival that
anyone could think of. I'd even agree to it, because there's
just no other alternatives right now."

(Understanding Power, 388)

Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating a fascist takeover
because the ends justify the means. This is classic
problem-reaction-solution programming, as he points to the
real threat of pollution and then offers the solution of
Peak Oil 
As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded
and amplified by Globalist oil, banking, and drug cartels,
with specific help from the Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF,
along with other phony NGO's like the Sierra Club and
Greenpeace consistently call for population reduction.
Additionally these groups push the flat earth thesis of "Peak
Oil," predicting that oil supplies will soon run out and of
course...require massive worldwide population reductions.

Chomsky posted an entry called "Peak Oil" on his blog in June,
2004, writing the following: "The basic theory is
incontrovertible. The only questions have to do with timing
and cost."

Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr, Chomsky said the
following of Peak Oil:

"There's another side to this, there's a sense in which it's
advantageous if the oil peak is earlier. The reason why is it
will compel the world, primarily the U.S. here, to move toward
something like sustainable energy. If there's unbounded
amounts of hydrocarbons, we're just going to destroy the
environment for human life or most biological life, so the
earlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be
catastrophic, it could also be beneficial."

The "beneficial" aspects Chomsky discusses are likely the
resulting population control and starvation that would ensue
from such a shortage.

But, in reality, oil is abiotic and constantly regenerating.
This, while huge wells go untapped in Russia, Equatorial
Guinea, Nigeria, Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Alaska,
Venezuela, Bolivia, Norway, and the Gulf of Mexico.
Additionally, refinery capacity has been deliberately shut
down by the oil oligopoly in order to create artificial supply
shortages. Market prices are controlled by the Anglo-American
cartel and they intend to use this as a vehicle for engineered
crises. At this years Bilderberg meeting Henry Kissinger
reportedly predicted $100 a barrel oil within a year. The only
possible result is a complete worldwide depression.

It is within the "radical" Left that horror stories of
diminishing oil find their home. Even within the 9-11 truth
movement, authors like Mike Ruppert and Nafeez Ahmed have
attempted to attach Peak Oil as the reason for government
engineering of 9-11 and the wars in the Middle East. By
polluting the activist movements with Peak Oil lies, the
Globalists have created an army of strong advocates for $5 a
gallon gasoline.
Project for the New American Century (PNAC) 
Another triumph of Chomsky's disinfo campaign has been the
active denial of the The Project for the New American Century
(PNAC), a neocon group that published radical statements
calling for world war, population control, and a worldwide
police state back in 2000. The signatures on the documents
included Dick Cheney and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz,
Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle,
and Eliot Abrams.

It was Zakheim who previously ran Systems Planning Inc., which
made remote-control software for commercial airliners. Also as
comptroller of the Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of
taxpayer money without explanation. Yet his corruption was not
singular; after Bush took his figurehead position in the
stolen election of 2000, all of the PNAC radicals became the
architects of 9-11 and purveyors of pre-war lies about Iraq.

Their infamous "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document,
produced in 2000 before 9-11, reads like prophecy, calling for
theater wars against Iraq, Iran, and North Korea. They also
admitted that "Further, the process of transformation, even if
it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one,
absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new
Pearl Harbor." September 11, anyone?

They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large
sectors of the human population. The document states:
"[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target'
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the
realm of terror to a politically useful tool."

How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC
cabal, whose mad plans for world domination read like the lost
chapters of Mein Kampf?

If the Left Gatekeepers won't discuss these published
documents, how can we expect them to research the true history
of AIDS and the potential emerging avian flu? Should we be
surprised when they fail to mention the 60 plus dead
microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading researchers
in emerging viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an
expose of the heavy metals and biological agents in
Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists
linked to the Likud party in Israel, who presented similar
plans to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 ("Policy
for a Clean Break").

Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by
followers for his books like "The Fateful Triangle" which
detail many Israeli war crimes. Furthermore he often
criticizes the Isreali-linked network dominating U.S. foreign
policy. But as always, Chomsky again avoids the hardcore
issues, instead speaking in glittering generalities.

For example, he remains mute on the "Office of Special Plans,"
the ad-hoc nerve center of pre-war Iraq propaganda, run of
Cheney's office. It was here that Zionist moles like Paul
Wolfowitz, Larry Franklin, Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, and
Richard Perle cooked up phony WMD threats, links 9-11, and
collaboration between secular Iraq and Al-Qaeda.

Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud
party and intelligence syndicate Mossad, operated a two-way
spy network; just as manufactured propaganda flowed from
Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S. secrets on Iran secretly floated
into Sharon's war cabinet.

In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia
don of all lobbying cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top
level AIPAC officers like Steve Rosen often acted as a
go-between, then using that same fake intelligence to
strong-arm the Congress where they control both sides..

All parties mentioned, from Rosen to Franklin, are now under
investigation from the FBI and Justice Department for the
aforementioned crimes. Major articles in the Washington Post
now admit Franklin, working with Feith and Cambone, was
passing secrets to Israel through AIPAC. Chomsky has never
spoken publically about any of these topics, and certainly not
the Mossad involvement in false-flag terror events like the
USS Liberty and connections to 9-11.
Vote Fraud 
When he isn't busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11 or
the crimes of the CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying
the vote fraud of 2004, which ushered in another term for the
neocon dictatorship. Chomsky often brags that he does not vote
in presidential elections, noting that both sides are owned by
corporations. But he has openly denied the role of electronic
voting fraud in 2000 and the more prominent example of 2004.
In 2004, exit polls in Ohio and Florida showed John Kerry
winning by a comfortable margin, but mysteriously numbers
showed a Bush victory.

The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State in
Ohio, Ken Blackwell, managed Bush's campaign in the state,
much like Katherine Harris did in Florida during 2000.
Diebold, the company which makes most of the electronic voting
machines, is crawling with former CIA and NSA members and used
convicted felons to design their software. The Diebold CEO
Walden O'Dell is a Bush Pioneer and wrote in a GOP fundraising
letter that he was "committed to delivering electoral votes to
the President."

The Diebold code is private and has been exposed as being
easily hacked by Bev Harris at In North
Carolina and Georgia, machines were throwing out 5,000 block
votes for Bush without explanation. But none of this seems to
interest Chomsky, who finds the accusations of vote fraud to
be without merit:

"I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate count in
itself is a random effect. As for collusion, yes, there are
concerns, but concerns are not evidence. The problem that
concerns you may or may not be real, but in my view, even if
we take the worst case scenario, it is still marginal -- just
as the Florida chads were marginal in the 2000 elections. I
know of no reason to suppose that electronic voting will have
more than a random effect."

Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of
electronic voting because it would awaken too many people to
the total bankruptcy of the system. It is important that
college activists at Berkeley think their vote for Ralph Nader
counted. If they knew the entire game was rigged like a Don
King boxing match, too many illusions would break down.
World Government 
Chomsky plays the left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a
false dialectic of the evil American imperialist as the
antagonist aggressor, contrasted by the savior UN world
government as the benevolent deux ex machina.

This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist U.S.
against the godly UN fits the classic MO of "poisoning the
well." Essentially, Chomsky acts as a re-direct agent: he
acknowledges many crimes of American foreign policy and then
offers world government and international law as the solution.

The Globalists have long been masters of such a paradigm. In
the early part of the 20th century, the same Wall Street
bankers crafted the doctrines of Communism. While posing as a
workers' liberation theology, it pushed for a central bank,
world army, world court, world government, and the abolition
of religion, private property, and the nation state.

Like other "anarchist" agent provacatuers such as John Zerzan
(who helped train violent mobs to ruin the Seattle WTO
protests in 1999), Chomsky has called for the elimination of
private property. He argues, "that some form of council
communism is the natural form of revolutionary socialism in an
industrial society."

In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination of
the nation-state and national sovereignty to be replaced by a
one world government:

"Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary would be a
breakdown of the nation-state system- because I think that's
not a viable system. It's not necessarily the natural form of
human organization." (314)

Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines, is
essentially endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the
breakdown of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world

Noam Chomsky is a shameless world government pimp, and has
heaped lavish praise on men like Bertrand Russell who helped
designed the New World Order. Lucky for him, Chomsky has been
publicly rewarded for his faithful service to the UN cause. In
Febraury 2004, he received the Award of Excellence at the UN
Correspondents Association Club in New York. Previous winners
included Globalist assets like Mikhail Gorbachev.
Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is
it any surprise he supports some of the worst UN programs?
U.N.E.S.C.O, the nightmare UN vehicle posing as an "aid"
organization, finds a strong advocate with Chomsky.

Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller
clan, U.N.E.S.C.O projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda
into American schools and with the goal of eventually merging
the curriculum with Mexico and Canada in the proposed
Panamerican Union; and seizing control of huge swaths of
American federal lands through "UN World Heritage" sites. The
first U.N.E.S.C.O chief Julian Huxley said during his tenure
in 1948:

"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world
humanism, global in extent... It can stress the transfer of
full sovereignty from separate nations to a world political
organization Political unification in some sort of world
government will be requiredto help the emergence of a single
world culture."

But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of the UN, endorses the
goals of U.N.E.S.C.O wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil
conservatives who question its motives:

"U.N.E.S.C.O - because it's working for the Third World-we
practically put them out of business. The United States
launched a huge propaganda campaign against U.N.E.S.C.O. in
the 1970's and Eighties- it was full of outrageous lies,
totally fabricated, but nevertheless it sufficed to eliminate
the Third World orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and make it stop
doing things it was doing around the Third World, like
improving literacy and health care and so on. (86)
Many credit Chomsky's "Manufacturing Consent" with being the
premier study of government propaganda. In Leftist circles it
is hailed as a Bible, a rite of passage for any true activist
to understand the system. But again, Chomsky's work, while
appearing radical, is actually gatekeeper disinfo.

Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that
newspapers diminish American war crimes while exaggerating
those of foreign governments. Such a point is easy to prove,
and he does so in his own droll and methodical method.

Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant
in the room: direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and
journalists beginning in the 1950's under Operation

Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program
which covertly put major publishing, newspaper, and media
outlets, as well as thousands of individual reporters under
direct agency control. Agents included Ben Bradlee at
Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life, and Arthur Sulzberger
of The New York Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington Post,
and Joseph Harrison Christian Science Monitor.

Shouldn't this a significant development for a historian
authoring an honest study of propaganda? After all who is to
say that this program doesn't still continue? The Bush
administration has admitted spending hundreds of millions on
fake newscasts and paying individual reporters like Armstrong
Williams to push talking points in newspapers. What about the
times they haven't been caught? Exactly how many mainstream
commentary and news outlets work with the CIA and White House?

Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly news
on ABC, CBS, and NBC are almost exactly the same, while
Newsweek, Time, and the New York Times push the elitist agenda
on cue (as seen most prominently in the run up to the war in

Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between the
Bilderberg Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn't
this concern the so-called radical anarchist, when media
editors attend secret meetings calling for eugenics, world
government, and a cashless society control grid?

Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek, Economist,
Washington Post, New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news
outlet in between have attended the world government meetings.

Further, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly
calls for a Panamerican Union and the end of American national
sovereignty? The CFR counts amongst its members major editors,
owners, and journalists in media outlets from PBS to CBS, CNN
to News Corp., New Republic to U.S. News and World Report.

Aren't these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda
Chomsky identifies? In "Manufacturing Consent," Chomsky takes
limited aim at an easy target. But he fails to dig deeper and
examine the actual reasons why the propaganda permeates the
mainstream media opinion. Clearly the influence of the CIA,
CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House have turned major
media outlets into little more than docile commissars.
Furthermore, the interlocking interests of media owners with
the military industrial complex have served to sway content
even further.

Chomsky's "classic" study is little more than a limited
hangout project. He is merely shooting the messengers, blaming
journalistic "bias" while failing to follow the trail of
money, power, corruption, and black propaganda. Instead, he
identifies some passive propaganda and is hailed as a
brilliant analyst and purveyor of truth by the Leftist
minions. But his true achievement is ignoring the reasons
behind the lies, as he executes a masterful bait and switch
tactic. Is it a coincidence that Chomsky's co-author for
"Manufacturing Consent," Edward Herman, has also denied any
government complicity in 9-11?

While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected the
Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devices
for the Globalists because they help define the limits of the
false left-right paradigm. Much like David Horowitz, a former
Leftist, currently does for the radical Right. Is it a
surprise that he edited a book called "The Anti-Chomsky
Reader?" It should only be natural since they both serve the
same role of gatekeeper.

Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele
Malkin, William Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin
serve as Right Gatekeepers. They criticize the failures of
liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush worshipping,
illegal wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our
Constitutional rights for "security." In doing so they pollute
the conservative movement and help marginalize true
conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups
like Gun Owners of America.

Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write
about the crimes of American imperialism and then call for
population control, gun control, global government under the
UN, and a totally socialized Brave New World society.

The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act
of appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide
enslavement and murder. In all likelihood they get a little
help from the propaganda scientists at the venerable Tavistock
institute in London and adjuncts of the CIA's Mockingbird
program; clearly the Left's denial of 9-11 truths has been too
coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.

In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles
between pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and
Republican Ann Coulter.

All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a
masterfully crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and
give the people false choices. Thus at either extreme of the
spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky to Horowitz,
one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global
government. This is the genius of the New World Order, their
complete castration of free political will through carefully
managed propaganda agents. The rest of the media jackals serve
as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and power hungry
sycophants with massive egos and more concern for their career
than the truth.

Noam Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper associates must be
actively exposed for their role in the propaganda system. For
nearly 40 years since they infiltrated the activist movement,
these Left gatekeepers have made the activist movements
impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective. Thus instead
of understanding their enslavement, many activists end up
calling for tighter chains by echoing Chomsky's calls for gun
control, population control, and a world government under the
UN. They end up critiquing the Iraq disaster without seeing
government involvement in 9-11 and the CIA/MI-6/Mossad
creation known as Al-Qaeda.

Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly
push real activists into dead-end solutions. Until they are
vocally exposed, the Left will continue to remain a managed
asset of the New World Order.


If you find this material useful, you might want to check out our website
( or try out our low-traffic, moderated email 
list by sending a message to:

You are encouraged to forward any material from the lists or the website,
provided it is for non-commercial use and you include the source.

Richard Moore (rkm)
Wexford, Ireland

"Apocalypse Now and the Brave New World"

List archives:

    "...the Patriot Act followed 9-11 as smoothly as the
      suspension of the Weimar constitution followed the
      Reichstag fire."  
      - Srdja Trifkovic

    There is not a problem with the system.
    The system is the problem.

    Faith in ourselves - not gods, ideologies, leaders, or programs.
Informative links: