Swine Flu Madness
Under federal laws adopted post 9/11, the Secretary of HHS can
More than a third of parents don’t want their kids vaccinated, according to an Associated Press-GfK poll yet public health officials seem ready to ram it down their throats if possible. Parents say they are concerned about side effects from the new vaccine and many say swine flu doesn’t amount to any greater health threat than seasonal flu. The AP poll found that 38 percent of parents said they were unlikely to give permission for their kids to be vaccinated at school.The AP poll, conducted Oct. 1-5, found 72 percent of those surveyed are worried about side effects.2
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius appealed for widespread inoculation against swine flu, vouching unconditionally for the vaccine: “We know it’s safe and secure.” This official has what can only be considered as Swine Flu Madness for she really does not know if it’s safe and secure. In fact she has to know that a warning that the new swine flu jab is linked to a deadly nerve disease has been sent by the Government to senior neurologists in a confidential letter. The letter from the Health Protection Agency, the official body that oversees public health tells the neurologists that they must be alert for an increase in a brain disorder called Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS),3 which could be triggered by the vaccine. GBS attacks the lining of the nerves, causing paralysis and inability to breathe, and can be fatal. The letter, sent to about 600 neurologists on July 29,4 is the first sign that there is concern at the highest levels that the vaccine itself could cause serious complications yet Sebelius and others are on their bullhorns telling the public it is safe.
More than half a million U.S. children yearly have
U.S. health officials have lost track of how many illnesses and deaths have been caused by the first global flu epidemic in 40 years. And they did it on purpose. Government doctors stopped counting swine flu cases in July.6 Yet at the same time we find at a recent CDC weekly meeting on swine flu, Anne Schuchat, MD, Director of the CDC’s National Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, informed of the increasing illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths, virtually all due to the H1N1 virus. To date, 37-states have reported cases of swine flu, with 19-paediatric deaths reported last week, which means 76-children have died of swine flu this year, many more than the typical influenza toll in the past years. According to CDC, between 30th August and 3rd October, 1,784-American adults and children have died from pneumonia or different strains of influenza.7 Health officials seem to be confused; are they counting or not?
Fortunately we have some heroes standing up to the might of the vaccine industry and public health officials. Mike Adams over at Natural News reports that health freedom attorney Jim Turner is filing a lawsuit in Washington D.C. mid-day Friday in an urgent effort to halt the distribution of the swine flu vaccine in America. On behalf of plaintiffs Dr. Gary Null and other licensed health care workers of New York State, the lawsuit charges that the FDA violated the law in its hasty approval of four swine flu vaccines by failing to scientifically determine neither the safety nor efficacy of the vaccines. “The suit will seek an injunction against the FDA from approving the vaccine and the core of the argument is that they have not done the proper safety and efficacy tests on the vaccine to allow it to be released at this time,” attorney Jim Turner told Natural News.8
The World Health Organization (WHO) restated its confidence in the H1N1 flu vaccine on October 6th, calling it the most important tool against the pandemic though they admit that mild adverse side effects such as muscle cramps or headache are to be expected in some cases, but everyone who has access to the vaccine should be inoculated the WHO said. Of course they don’t mention the possibility of serious side effects including death.
As soon as swine flu vaccinations start next month, some people
A majority of doctors and medical examiners are notoriously prone to gloss over the official cause of death when mortality occurs in close proximity to vaccine administration. It is not surprising that the WHO recommends the vaccine even to pregnant women for the WHO is a front organization for one world government, which obviously could care less if fetuses are contaminated. Officials are worried about spontaneous miscarriages, because they are urging pregnant women to be among the first to be vaccinated even though most of the vaccines contain thimerosal, which is fifty percent methyl mercury by weight.
Any competent biochemist would look at the structure of
Yet today we find the New York Times giving space to Dr. Paul A. Offit who says, “Infants could safely receive eight times as much mercury as is contained in the H1N1 vaccine.”9 Dr. Haley, former chairman of the chemistry department of Kentucky University is one of the most intelligent and noble men I have ever had the pleasure to talk to. One can hardly say that about Offit who has financial stakes in the vaccine industry.10
Doctor Admits Vaccine Is More Deadly Than
Why would you sign a consent form for your children to be injected with mercury, which is 100 times more brain-toxic than lead? And why would your government want you to do so? Pregnant women and their fetuses are especially sensitive to mercury and mercury has been established by the federal vaccine court to be associated with autism in cases where the children had mitochondrial disease. Problem is doctors and nurses have not the slightest idea which children have such metabolic disorder before they inject their little patients with so many vaccines it would turn grandma’s hair white if it wasn’t already.
Documents from the archives of Eli Lilly & Company
The following is a list of some of the nasty side effects that the package insert for the Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine manufactured by Novartis admits to:11
*Local injection site reactions (including pain, pain limiting limb movement, redness, swelling, warmth, ecchymosis, induration)
GlaxoSmithKline won a further 22 government orders for its H1N1 swine flu vaccine in the last two months, taking the total number of doses ordered to 440 million worth some $3.5 billion. Rivals in flu vaccines include Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Baxter, AstraZeneca and CSL. The President’s Council of Advisors anticipates that 2009 H1N1 may infect half of the US population, require 1.8 million hospitalizations, and result in 30,000-90,000 deaths12 but it is not clear whether the virus or the vaccines themselves will be the major cause of what they are anticipating. Considering the fact that the swine flu has been very mild we can easily believe that the vaccines themselves will do the dirty work.
I have run against so many histories of little children
Dr. Hay is not alone and its public knowledge that tens of thousands of health care workers typically avoid flu shots because of questions of safety and effectiveness. Fewer than half of them got flu vaccinations last year, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey. That includes physicians in clinics, lab technicians, respiratory therapists and home health aides.
Approximately one-half of the hundreds of parents
The official advice on swine flu protection is essentially limited to “wash your hands, get your vaccine shot and cough into your elbow. The omission of vitamin D (among many other things) is another demonstration of pharmaceutical and medical terrorism. The officials we pay and trust could care less if we die from the flu or flu shot, in fact our deaths substantiate their theories and marketing campaigns. The simple addition of vitamin D supplementation or recommendations to get healthy doses of sun and vitamin C would go a long way, longer than the vaccines to mitigate death from the flu. So would recommendations to doctors and patients to fully hydrate. Yesterday I received a testimonial13 of the use of hydrogen peroxide and in addition to the IMVA protocol14 for Swine Flu treatments.
Utter Criminal Madness to Use Thimerosal in Vaccines
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. published in the Huffington Post a few years ago devastating evidence that implicated the CDC in a terrible scandal in regards to the unnecessary injection of millions of children with thimerosal a few years back and this is important because again the CDC is going to allow mercury containing thimerosal to be used in the swine flu shots as well as the regular flu shots in the fall of 2009.
Correspondence obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveals a medical monstrosity at the very center of the medical world. Soon after the CDC in July 1999 recommended that the nation’s vaccine makers eliminate Thimerosal as a preservative, “as soon as possible,” they themselves (the CDC) secretly discouraged Thimerosal removal in effectdeliberately exposing millions of infants to continued mercury poisoning.
According to Kennedy, in a July 1999 letter, vaccine producer SmithKline Beecham tells CDC that it is ready to produce non-Thimerosal DTP (Diptheria/Tetanus/Pertussis) vaccines immediately and has sufficient inventories to supply the entire U.S. market during the remainder of 1999 and the first half of 2000, by which time other vaccine manufacturers would have their Thimerosal-free DTP vaccines on line. Thimerosal-laden DTP vaccines containing 25 micrograms of mercury apiece (75 thousand trillion atoms of mercury) were then being administered to American infants at two months, four months and six months — far exceeding EPA’s recommended safe level for mercury. Had CDC accepted SmithKline’s offer, it could have immediately reduced the mercury exposures to vaccinated six-month-old children by 40%.
Kennedy continued, “However, in November, CDC mysteriously sent a letter back rejecting SmithKline’s offer. Then, on July 14, 2000 CDC published a deceptive press release promising to require that all vaccines be Thimerosal-free as soon as “adequate supplies are available.” This was a full 12 months after the agency had denied SmithKline’s proposal.”
I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral
“If CDC were basing its decision on safety alone, it would have taken SmithKline up on its offer. That’s a no-brainer,” said a federal health official to Kennedy anonymously. “So there were other considerations beside safety that were guiding their decision making.” “Among these “other considerations” were CDC’s important concerns for the preservation of the vaccine program, a bureaucratic impulse for self-preservation, and protecting the economic interests of its vaccine industry friends.”Immediate withdrawal would send a strong message; ‘We messed up!'” the health official told Kennedy. “And I don’t think they wanted to send that message to parents, the public or those considering legal action.” “There was also concern,” says the federal official, “that an immediate withdrawal might discredit the international vaccine programs for which CDC is an important partner.”
Why will CDC inject millions of minority kids in America’s poorest
Mark Sircus Ac., OMD