LA Times: Big Oil buys Sacramento


Richard Moore

Original source URL:,1,7287489.story

From the Los Angeles Times
Big Oil buys Sacramento

Why you're not hearing a peep from California politicians on record-high gas 

By Jamie Court and Judy Dugan

JAMIE COURT and JUDY DUGAN are founders of, a project of the 
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights.

May 14, 2007

WHO'S AFRAID of Big Oil? Apparently, California's elected officials. Gasoline 
prices are stuck well above last year's record highs and about 50 cents above 
the national average. Yet state politicians are not saying or doing a thing, 
except for raking in political cash from the oil companies and flying around the
world on their dime.

Take Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who once claimed that he was so rich he did not
need anyone else's money ‹ and who isn't running for another office. Yet as 
gasoline prices were breaking last year's record of $3.38 a gallon, 
Schwarzenegger collected a $100,000 check May 1 from Chevron, the West's largest
refiner. The company certainly had the cash on hand. Just three days earlier, it
reported a $4.7-billion first-quarter profit, up 18% over the same period last 


Energy meeting: An article on Monday's Op-Ed page stated that Assembly Speaker 
Fabian Nunez and the governor's chief of staff, Susan P. Kennedy, attended a 
12-day energy conference in Rio de Janeiro in the spring. The trip was in 
November 2006. ‹

The contribution brought Schwarzenegger's take from Chevron to $665,000 (making 
it his 15th largest donor) since 2003, and his total political tribute from the 
energy industry is now $4 million. According to a recent Schwarzenegger 
fundraising solicitation, Chevron's $100,000 buys the company special briefings 
with the governor, something that beleaguered motorists aren't getting.

Like power plant owners during California's 2001 electricity crisis, refiners 
such as Chevron have discovered that they can make more money by producing less 
gasoline. So they do. They have, over more than 20 years, deliberately reduced 
their capacity until they can barely meet California's needs under the best of 
circumstances. Industry spokesmen defend this as efficiency. But there is no 
slack in the production system, which shorts the market and raises prices.

Any planned or unplanned refinery outage, pipeline break or power failure causes
prices to jump.

Take the case of a possum and a raccoon that, in March, bit through power 
substation lines feeding two refineries in the South Bay. The critters expired, 
but the outage caused a 7-cent jump in local wholesale gasoline prices. The cost
of refining gasoline is stable over time, so these price spikes equal pure 
profit for Chevron and Co.

Gasoline isn't like potato chips or even automobiles, which are made by 
competitive companies that have to persuade purchasers. Gasoline is a product we
can't spurn and for which there are no widely available alternatives. The lack 
of competition makes the situation worse.

Chevron refined 22% less oil in the U.S. during the first quarter of this year 
than in the same quarter of 2006 because of longer "planned maintenance" 
downtime and accidents. Yet its total profit on U.S. refining increased 66%. 
Making less gasoline, it made much more money.

So why is there no special legislative session on the gasoline crisis? No talk 
of regulating refiners to make supply meet demand?

Oil companies poured $90 million into California political campaigns during the 
2006 election cycle. This display of sheer political muscle deters even 
well-meaning politicians from clashing with Big Oil.

Democrats take Big Oil's millions too. The state Democratic Party accepted 
$50,000 from Chevron just last week. Campaign finance rules don't tell us which 
candidates Chevron might find most deserving of that money, but it's foolish to 
think such suggestions are not made.

Just as troubling is the access that oil companies have to our elected 
officeholders that the public doesn't.

Schwarzenegger's powerful chief of staff, Susan P. Kennedy, and her partner 
spent a legislative spring break in Rio de Janeiro at the posh Copacabana Palace
with Democratic Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez and his wife ‹ on the tab of a 
foundation largely financed by Chevron and other energy companies. During the 
12-day conference, Chevron's lobbyist got an entire day on the official agenda, 
which the public knows about only because of our Public Records Act request. 
Nuñez, who last year was highly critical of oil companies, seems to have nothing
to say this year.

The chairs of the state Senate and Assembly energy committees spent spring break
in Japan sipping sake and munching sushi with energy and telecommunications 
executives. The trip was financed by the same foundation, the California 
Foundation on the Environment and the Economy. On board was an executive with 
Sound Energy Solutions, a company working with ConocoPhillips to establish a 
liquefied natural gas, or LNG, terminal at the port of Long Beach. Residents 
have stalled that particular project, no thanks to a junket itinerary that 
included a lengthy LNG plant tour.

No matter what underlies the current inaction on gas prices, the governor and 
legislators should understand that consumers' rage may not be fleeting. Former 
Gov. Gray Davis discovered that in the 2003 recall as the energy crisis lingered
in memory. Schwarzenegger is more popular, but he is not immune to the anger 
mounting over every $75 fill-up of the minivan.

If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at

Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times

Posting archives:
Escaping the Matrix website:
cyberjournal website:

Community Democracy Framework:

Subscribe cyberjournal list: •••@••.•••  (send blank message)

cyberjournal blog (join in):

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)