-------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:10:38 +0100 From: "PEERS: WantToKnow.info Email List" <•••@••.•••> Subject: Key Media Articles Reveal Secret Realities of Government To subscribe to or unsubscribe from this list (one email every few days) or to reply to this message, see end of email This message is available online at <http://www.WantToKnow.info/008/080307governmentsecrecy> Dear friends, Below are highly revealing one-paragraph excerpts of key media articles on the nature of government secrecy today. These powerful articles expose some of the secret manipulations and agendas of influential unseen players within governments and government agencies. Links are provided to the full articles on major media websites. If any link should fail to function, <http://www.WantToKnow.info/findmissinglinks>click here. By choosing to educate ourselves on these important issues and to <http://www.WantToKnow.info/spreadtheword>spread the word, we can and will <http://www.WantToKnow.info/brighterfuture>build a brighter future. With best wishes, Tod Fletcher and <http://www.myspace.com/fredburks>Fred Burks for <http://www.peerservice.org>PEERS and the <http://www.wanttoknow.info/aboutus>WantToKnow.info Team Inside the secretive Bilderberg Group 2005-09-29, BBC News <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4290944.stm>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4290944.stm How much influence do private networks of the rich and powerful have on government policies and international relations? One group, the Bilderberg, has often attracted speculation that it forms a shadowy global government. Every year since 1954 [they have brought] together about 120 leading business people and politicians. At this year's meeting in Germany, the audience included the heads of the World Bank and European Central Bank, Chairmen or Chief Executives from Nokia, BP, Unilever, DaimlerChrysler and Pepsi ... editors from five major newspapers, members of parliament, ministers, European commissioners ... and the queen of the Netherlands. The chairman ... is 73-year-old Viscount Etienne Davignon. In an extremely rare interview, he played down the importance of Bilderberg. "I don't think (we are) a global ruling class because I don't think a global ruling class exists." Will Hutton ... who attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1997, says people take part in these networks in order to influence the way the world works, to create what he calls "the international common sense". And that "common sense" is one which supports the interests of Bilderberg's main participants. For Bilderberg's critics the fact that there is almost no publicity about the annual meetings is proof that they are up to no good. Bilderberg meetings often feature future political leaders shortly before they become household names. Bill Clinton went in 1991 while still governor of Arkansas, Tony Blair was there two years later while still an opposition MP. All the recent presidents of the European Commission attended Bilderberg meetings before they were appointed. Informal and private networks like Bilderberg have helped to oil the wheels of global politics and globalisation for the past half a century. Note: Why is this meeting of top world leaders kept so secret? Why is there no website? Why, until a few years ago, was there virtually no reporting on this influential group in the <http://www.WantToKnow.info/mediacover-up>major media? (Note that the <http://www.onlinejournal.org/Special_Reports/052405Estulin/052405estulin.html>alternative media has had some good articles and a <http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&q=bilderberg+group&btnG=Search>Google search can be highly informative) For lots more reliable information on powerful, secret groups like this, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/secretsocietiesnewsarticles>click here. Under The Influence 2007-04-02, CBS News <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/29/60minutes/main2625305.shtml>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/29/60minutes/main2625305.shtml If you have ever wondered why the cost of prescription drugs in the United States are the highest in the world or why it's illegal to import cheaper drugs from Canada or Mexico, you need look no further than the pharmaceutical lobby and its influence in Washington, D.C. Congressmen are outnumbered two to one by lobbyists for an industry that spends roughly a $100 million a year in campaign contributions and lobbying expenses to protect its profits. One reason [drug company] profits have exceeded Wall Street expectations is the Medicare prescription drug bill ... passed three-and-a-half years ago. The unorthodox roll call on one of the most expensive bills ever placed before the House of Representatives began in the middle of the night. The only witnesses were congressional staffers, hundreds of lobbyists, and U.S. Representatives like Dan Burton, R-Ind., and Walter Jones, R-N.C. "The pharmaceutical lobbyists wrote the bill," says Jones. Why did the vote finally take place at 3 a.m.? "They didn't want on national television in primetime," according to Burton. "I've been in politics for 22 years," says Jones, "and it was the ugliest night I have ever seen." Jones says the arm-twisting was horrible. It certainly wasn't ugly for the drug lobby which ... has been a source of lucrative employment opportunities for congressmen when they leave office. In all, at least 15 congressional staffers, congressmen and federal officials left to go to work for the pharmaceutical industry, whose profits were increased by several billion dollars. "They have unlimited resources," Burton says. "And when they push real hard to get something accomplished in the Congress of the United States, they can get it done." Note: This article also states that the Medicare prescription bill "was the largest entitlement program in more than 40 years, and the debate broke down along party lines." Usually Republicans are against entitlement programs while Democrats support them. Why was it the opposite in this case? Could it be that big industry made huge profits from the passage of this bill? For lots more, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/healthinformation#healthsummaries>click here. U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba 2001-05-01, ABC News <http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662 In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's ... Fidel Castro. America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs even proposed using the potential death of astronaut John Glenn during the first attempt to put an American into orbit as a false pretext for war with Cuba. Should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, they wrote, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof … that the fault lies with the Communists." The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after. Note: Many military and political leaders tend to look at the world as a <http://www.wanttoknow.info/brzezinskigrandchessboard>chess board. Sacrificing pawns (innocent civilians) is sometimes necessary to capture the queen. Is it beyond comprehension that this might have been <http://www.WantToKnow.info/9-11cover-up>the case with 9/11? And why was ABC the only major news source to report this highly revealing story? To read the shocking declassified documents, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/010501operationnorthwoods>click here. Secretive testing firms certify nation's vote count machines 2004-08-23, MSNBC News/Associated Press <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5762054/from/RL.4>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5762054/from/RL.4 The three companies that certify the nation's voting technologies operate in secrecy, and refuse to discuss flaws in the machines to be used by nearly one in three voters in November. Federal regulators have virtually no oversight over testing of the technology. The certification process, in part because the voting machine companies pay for it, is described as obsolete by those charged with overseeing it. Despite concerns over whether the so-called touchscreen machines can be trusted, the testing companies won't say publicly if they have encountered shoddy workmanship. They say they are committed to secrecy in their contracts with the voting machines' makers ‹ even though tax money ultimately buys or leases the machines. Michael Shamos, a Carnegie Mellon computer scientist and electronic voting expert, told lawmakers in Washington, D.C. "I find it grotesque that an organization charged with such a heavy responsibility feels no obligation to explain to anyone what it is doing." The system for "testing and certifying voting equipment in this country is not only broken, but is virtually nonexistent," Shamos added. More than a decade ago, the Federal Election Commission authorized the National Association of State Election Directors to choose the independent testers. On its Web site, the association says the three testing outfits "have neither the staff nor the time to explain the process to the public, the news media or jurisdictions." Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations 2007-10-04, New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/washington/04interrogate.html?ex=1349150400&en=8d75a80eddaf32b7&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/04/washington/04interrogate.html?ex=1349150400... When the Justice Department publicly declared torture ³abhorrent² in a legal opinion in December 2004, the Bush administration appeared to have abandoned its assertion of nearly unlimited presidential authority to order brutal interrogations. But soon after Alberto R. Gonzales¹s arrival as attorney general in February 2005, the Justice Department issued another opinion, this one in secret. It was a very different document; according to officials briefed on it, [it was] an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency. The new opinion ... for the first time provided explicit authorization to barrage terror suspects with a combination of painful physical and psychological tactics, including head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid temperatures. Later that year, as Congress moved toward outlawing ³cruel, inhuman and degrading² treatment, the Justice Department issued another secret opinion. The Justice Department document declared that none of the C.I.A. interrogation methods violated that standard. The classified opinions, never previously disclosed, are a hidden legacy of President Bush¹s second term and Mr. Gonzales¹s tenure at the Justice Department. Congress and the Supreme Court have intervened repeatedly in the last two years to impose limits on interrogations, and the administration has responded as a policy matter by dropping the most extreme techniques. But the 2005 Justice Department opinions remain in effect, and their legal conclusions have been confirmed by several more recent memorandums, officials said. They show how the White House has succeeded in preserving the broadest possible legal latitude for harsh tactics. Echelon spy network revealed 1999-11-03, BBC News <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/503224.stm>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/503224.stm Imagine a global spying network that can eavesdrop on every single phone call, fax or e-mail, anywhere on the planet. It sounds like science fiction, but it's true. Two of the chief protagonists - Britain and America - officially deny its existence. But the BBC has confirmation from the Australian Government that such a network really does exist and politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are calling for an inquiry. The base is linked directly to the headquarters of the US National Security Agency (NSA) at Fort Mead in Maryland, and it is also linked to a series of other listening posts scattered across the world, like Britain's own GCHQ. The power of the network, codenamed Echelon, is astounding. Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of international crime, like terrorism. The network is so secret that the British and American Governments refuse to admit that Echelon even exists. But another ally, Australia, has decided not to be so coy. The man who oversees Australia's security services, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security Bill Blick, has confirmed to the BBC that their Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) does form part of the network. Asked if they are then passed on to countries like Britain and America, he said: "They might be in certain circumstances." But the system is so widespread all sorts of private communications, often of a sensitive commercial nature, are hoovered up and analysed. Skull And Bones 2004-06-13, CBS News <http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/02/60minutes/main576332.shtml>http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/02/60minutes/main576332.shtml As opposite as George Bush and John Kerry may seem to be, they do share a common secret - one they've shared for decades. The secret: details of their membership in Skull and Bones, the elite Yale University society whose members include some of the most powerful men of the 20th century. Bonesmen, as they're called, are forbidden to reveal what goes on in their inner sanctum. Bones has included presidents, cabinet officers, spies, Supreme Court justices, [and] captains of industry. They'd responded to questions with utter silence until an enterprising Yale graduate, Alexandra Robbins, managed to penetrate the wall of silence in her book, Secrets of the Tomb. "I spoke with about 100 members of Skull and Bones. They were members who were tired of the secrecy,² says Robbins. ³But probably twice that number hung up on me, harassed me, or threatened me.² Skull and Bones, with all its ritual and macabre relics, was founded in 1832. Since then, it has chosen or "tapped" only 15 senior students a year who become ... lifetime members of the ultimate old boys' club. A lot of Bonesmen have gone on to positions of great power. President Bush ... tapped five fellow Bonesmen to join his administration. Bonesmen have [included] William Howard Taft, the 27th President; Henry Luce, the founder of Time Magazine; and W. Averell Harriman, the diplomat and confidant of U.S. presidents. Mr. Bush, like his father and grandfather before him, has refused to talk openly about Skull and Bones. But as a Bonesman, he was required to reveal his innermost secrets to his fellow Bones initiates. They're supposed to recount their entire sexual histories in ... a dimly-lit cozy room. Brainwash victims win cash claims 2004-10-17, London Times <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-1313808,00.html>http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-1313808,00.html Hundreds of mentally ill patients who were subjected to barbaric CIA-funded brainwashing experiments ... could be entitled to compensation following a landmark court ruling. Doctor Ewan Cameron, who became one of the world¹s leading psychiatrists, developed techniques used by Nazi scientists to wipe out the existing personalities of people in his care. Cameron ... was recruited by the CIA during the cold war while working at McGill University in Montreal, Canada. He carried out mind-control experiments using drugs such as LSD on hundreds of patients, but only 77 of them were awarded compensation. Now a landmark ruling by a Federal Court judge in Montreal will allow more than 250 former patients, whose claims were rejected, to seek compensation. Last week, Alan Stein, of Montreal law firm Stein and Stein ... confirmed he was in the process of contacting former clients who could now renew their appeal. ³There are about 200 people still due compensation,² he said. Using techniques similar to those portrayed in the celebrated novel the Manchurian Candidate, it was believed that people could be brainwashed and reprogrammed to carry out specific acts. Cameron developed a range of depatterning ³treatments². Patients were woken from drug-induced stupors two or three times a day for multiple electric shocks. In a specially designed ³sleep room² made famous by Anne Collins¹s book of the same name, Cameron placed a speaker under the patient¹s pillow and relayed negative messages for 16 hours a day. Cameron ... rose to become the first president of the World Psychiatric Association. Note: If the above link does not work, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/mkcourtcase>click here. This article clearly shows that the Manchurian candidate (programmed assassin) is not just fiction. For a powerful two-page summary of 18,000 pages of declassified CIA documents on this disturbing mind control program, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol>click here. Links to view the original top secret documents are included. 80 Institutions Used in C.I.A. Mind Studies 1977-08-04, New York Times <http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20D15F63A5B167493C6A91783D85F438785F9>http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20D15F63A5B167493C6A91783D85... Adm. Stansfield Turner, the Director of Central Intelligence, testified today that the C.I.A. had secretly supported human behavior control research at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges or universities as well as hospitals, prisons and pharmaceutical companies. He said that the main action years of MK-Ultra were from 1953 through 1963. The projects, he said, had included tests of LSD and of a "K," or "knockout drop." The agency had supported 185 nongovernment researchers in 149 separate research projects. Admiral Turner said that ... 8,000 pages of newly discovered documents do not contain the names of the subjects of the tests but do contain "leads" that might enable them to be found. Admiral Turner acknowledged under questioning that the C.I.A. had apparently planned to test drugs on terminal cancer patients at the same institution where it secretly contributed $375,000 toward the construction of a hospital building. The New York Times has independently confirmed the institution is Georgetown University Medical School here. Admiral Turner [also] said that "some unwitting testing took place on criminal sexual psychopaths confined at a state hospital." At the two-hour hearing today, Senator Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, pressed Admiral Turner to let the universities, researchers and possible subjects of the tests know of the C.I.A.'s involvement. "These individuals have a right to know who they are and why they were used," he said. Note: If the above link fails, <http://www.wantToKnow.info/770804nytimes.ciabehaviorcontrolmk-ultra>click here. For lots more reliable, verifiable information suggesting a major cover-up of government mind control programs, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol>click here. UFOS: Are They for Real? 2007-11-09, CNN <http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/09/lkl.01.html>http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/09/lkl.01.html LARRY KING, HOST: Our panel here in Los Angeles, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/ufosnewsarticles-0-10000#article_1350>Fife Symington, the former governor of Arizona, who in 1997 ridiculed an <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights>infamous UFO sighting by thousands of people in the state and later admitted that he himself saw a craft. James Fox, the filmmaker who is the executive producer of the award-winning feature length documentary "<http://www.wanttoknow.info/060602ufosvideosfootage>Out of the Blue" -- the definitive investigation of the UFO phenomenon. Colonel <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_I._Halt>Chuck Halt [USAF] the deputy base commander of Bentwaters Woodbridge, a U.S. military base in Suffolk, England. Sergeant <http://www.rendlesham-incident.co.uk/>Jim Penniston ... a security supervisor at that base in 1980. He says he sat with a UFO on the ground for 45 minutes before it hovered above him and shot into the air at an unearthly speed. SYMINGTON: I was a skeptic [until] I saw a wedge-shaped craft of enormous proportions fly over ... Phoenix. KING: Colonel Halt [what] did you see? HALT: We noticed three objects. They were illuminated with multiple lights and were moving at high speed in sharp, angular patterns. One of them approached us at very high speed and sent down a beam ... at our feet. SGT. JIM PENNISTON: I was there. We discovered a craft of unknown origin .. on the ground. We touched it, walked around it, photographed it. KING: Added to [our panel] is <http://www.wanttoknow.info/ufocover-up10pg#callahan>John Callahan, the former division chief of accidents and investigations branch of the FAA. In 1986 a Japanese pilot said he saw twin cylinders flying in formation within 500 feet of his air cargo jet. He claimed the object was the size of two aircraft carriers and it followed him for over 30 minutes. KING: After this incident, you said [the] FAA administrator held a briefing. CALLAHAN: When we got all done with our briefing ... the CIA man stood up and said, this event never happened, we were never here, you're all sworn to secrecy and we are confiscating all of this data. Note: To watch the video of this discussion, <http://www.ufoarea.com/video_larrykingufos.html>click here. For lots more fascinating information suggesting there may have been a major cover-up of the UFO phenomenon, follow the links in the article above and see our <http://www.wanttoknow.info/ufoinformation>UFO Information Center, which is filled with reliable, verifiable information on this important topic. Experts Urging Broader Inquiry In Towers' Fall 2001-12-25, New York Times <http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FB3E550C768EDDAB0994D9404482>http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FB3E550C768EDDAB0994D94... Saying that the current investigation into how and why the twin towers fell on Sept. 11 is inadequate, some of the nation's leading structural engineers and fire-safety experts are calling for a new, independent and better-financed inquiry that could produce the kinds of conclusions vital for skyscrapers and future buildings nationwide. Experts critical of the current effort...point out that the current team of 20 or so investigators has no subpoena power and little staff support and has even been unable to obtain basic information like detailed blueprints of the buildings that collapsed. Some structural engineers have said that one serious mistake has already been made...the decision to rapidly recycle the steel columns, beams and trusses that held up the buildings. Interviews with a handful of members of the team, which includes some of the nation's most respected engineers, also uncovered complaints that they had at various times been shackled with bureaucratic restrictions that prevented them from interviewing witnesses, examining the disaster site and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to the police and fire departments. Members have been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. Note: Our website has over 30 full articles posted from the New York Times. This is the only article for which the Times threated to sue us if we didn't remove it. We were allowed to replace it with this short summary. For more on this, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/011225nytimes>click here. For more reliable news articles suggesting a major cover-up of 9/11, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/9-11cover-up> click here. The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis 1987-11-04, WantToKnow.info/PBS Documentary <http://www.WantToKnow.info/050423secretgovernment>http://www.WantToKnow.info/050423secretgovernment The Secret Government is an interlocking network of official functionaries, spies, mercenaries, ex-generals, profiteers and superpatriots, who, for a variety of motives, operate outside the legitimate institutions of government. The Russians had been our ally against the Nazis, an expedient alliance for the sake of war. Now they were our enemy. To fight them we turned to some of the very men who had inflicted on humanity the horrors of Hitler¹s madness. We <http://www.wanttoknow.info/mindcontrol10pg#paperclip>hired Nazis¹ as American spies. Admiral Gene La Rocque: ³That National Security Act of 1947 changed dramatically the direction of this great nation. It established the framework for a national security state. Never have we had a National Security Council so concerned about the nation¹s security that we¹re always looking for threats and looking how to <http://www.wanttoknow.info/powerofnightmares>orchestrate our society to oppose those threats. National Security was invented, almost, in 1947, and now it has become the prime mover of everything we do. The National Security Act also gave us the Central Intelligence Agency." In 1975 ... Congress took its first public look at the Secret Government. Senator Frank Church chaired the Select Committee to study government operations. The hearings opened the books on a string of lethal activities. >From the use of electric pistols and poison pellets, to Mafia connections and drug experiments. And they gave us a detailed account of assassination plots against foreign leaders and the overthrowing of sovereign governments. This is a system easily corrupted. While freedom does have enemies in the world, it can also be undermined here at home, in the dark, by those posing as its friends. Note: This highly revealing PBS documentary is available for free viewing on the Internet. For the link, written text, and much more on this amazingly revealing documentary, <http://www.wanttoknow.info/050423secretgovernment>click here. Final Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for positive change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at <http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational>http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational for an abundance of uplifting material. See our archive of revealing news articles at <http://www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles>http://www.WantToKnow.info/indexnewsarticles Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to support this important work. To make a donation by credit card, check, or money order: <http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk>http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk Explore these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit <http://www.peerservice.org>PEERS network: <http://www.momentoflove.org>http://www.momentoflove.org - Every person in the world has a heart <http://www.WantToKnow.info>http://www.WantToKnow.info - Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups <http://www.inspiringcommunity.org>http://www.inspiringcommunity.org - Building a Global Community for All <http://www.weboflove.org>http://www.weboflove.org - Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all <http://www.transformationteam.net>http://www.transformationteam.net - The Transformation Team: Conscious community in action Educational websites promoting transformation through information and inspiration To reply to this message, visit <http://www.wanttoknow.info/contactus.php>http://www.WantToKnow.info/contactus.php To subscribe to or unsubscribe from the WantToKnow.info list (one email every few days): <http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe>http://www.WantToKnow.info/subscribe <http://ymlpr.net/u.php?WTK>Change email address / Leave mailing list Hosting by <http://www.ymlpr.net>YourMailingListProvider -- -------------------------------------------------------- newslog archives: http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/?lists=newslog How We the People can change the world http://www.governourselves.org/ Escaping the Matrix: http://escapingthematrix.org/ The Phoenix Project http://www.wakingthephoenix.org/ The Post-Bush Regime: A Prognosis http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7693 Community Democracy Framework: http://cyberjournal.org/DemocracyFramework.html cyberjournal: http://cyberjournal.org Moderator: •••@••.••• (comments welcome)
