Johann Hari: The real scandal at the World Bank


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Johann Hari: The real scandal at the World Bank
The Bank is killing thousands of the poorest people in the world
Published: 26 April 2007

While the world's press has been fixated on the teeny-weeny scandal over whether
the World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz helped to get his girlfriend a 
$300,000-a-year gig next door, they have been ignoring the rancid stench of a 
far bigger scandal wafting from Wolfie's Washington offices.

This slo-mo scandal isn't about apparent petty corruption in DC. It's about how 
Wolfowitz's World Bank is killing thousands of the poorest people in the world, 
and knowingly worsening our worst crisis - global warming - every day.

Let's start with the victims. Meet Hawa Amadu, 70-something, living in the muddy
slums of Accra, the capital of Ghana, and trying to raise her grandkids as best 
she can. Hawa has a problem - a massive problem - and the World Bank put it 
there. She can't afford water or electricity any more. Why? The World Bank 
threatened to refuse to lend any more money to her government, which would 
effectively make it a leper to governmental donors and international business, 
unless it stopped subsidising the cost of these necessities. The subsidies 
stopped. The cost doubled. Now Hawa goes thirsty so her grandchildren can drink,
and weeps: "Am I supposed to drink air?"

She is not alone. Half a world away, in Bolivia, Maxima Cari - a mother - is 
also thirsty. "The World Bank took away my right to clean water," she explains. 
In 1997 the World Bank demanded the Bolivian government privatise the country's 
water supply. So Maxima couldn't afford it any more. Now she has to use dirty 
water from a well her villagers dug. This dirty water is making her children 
sick, and she is sullen. "I wash my children weekly," Maxima says. "Sometimes 
there's only enough water to wash their hands and faces, not their whole body 
... This is not a nice way to live." The newly elected socialist government of 
Evo Morales is planning to take the water back - and he is, of course, condemned
and threatened by the World Bank.

Meet some more victims. I have met hundreds, from Africa to Latin America to the
Middle East. Muracin Claircin is a rice farmer in Haiti - only he can't grow 
rice any more. In 1995, the World Bank demanded Haiti drop all restrictions on 
imports. The country was immediately flooded with rice from the US, which has 
been lavishly subsidised by the US government. The Haitian government barely 
exists and can't offer rival subsidies anyway: the World Bank forbids it. So now
Muracin is jobless and his family are starving.

Some 5,000 miles away, Charles Avaala in Ghana is watching his tomatoes rot. He 
used to grow them for a government-owned community tomato cannery that provided 
employment for his entire community. The World Bank ordered his government to 
close it down, and to open the country's markets to international competition. 
Now he can't compete with the subsidy-fattened tomatoes from Europe. He, too, is

How would Hawa and Maxima and Muracin and Charles feel if you told them none of 
this is considered a scandal, but business as usual?

These victims are not merely an anecdote soup; they are an accurate summary of 
the World Bank's effect on the poor. Don't take my word for it. The World Bank's
own Independent Evaluation Group just found that barely one in ten of its 
borrowers experienced persistent growth between 1995 and 2005 - a much smaller 
proportion than those who stagnated or slid deeper into poverty. The bank's own 
former chief economist, Nobel Prize-winner Joseph Stiglitz, says this approach 
"has condemned people to death... They don't care if people live or die."

Why? Why would a body that claims to help the poor actually thrash them? Because
its mission to end poverty has always been mythical. As George Monbiot explains 
in his book The Age of Consent, the World Bank was created in the 1940s by US 
economist Henry Dexter White to be a further projection of US power. The bank's 
head is invariably American, the bank is based in Washington, and the US has a 
permanent veto on policies. It does not promote a sensible mix of markets and 
state action - the real path to development. No: the World Bank pursues the 
interests of US corporations over the poor, every time.

The bank's staff salve their consciences by pickling themselves in an ideology -
neoliberalism - that says there is never a conflict between business rights and 
human rights. If it's good for Shell, it must be good for poor people - right?

This ideology also backfires on us in the rich world. In 2000, the World Bank 
was finally forced to undertake a review of its energy policies. It did its best
to rig it, putting the former energy minister of the corporation-licking 
Indonesian dictator General Suharto in charge. Emil Salim was even serving on 
the board of a coal company at the time he was appointed. But - to everyone's 
astonishment - Salim concluded by opposing the carbon-pumping oil and gas 
projects that make up 94 per cent of all the bank's energy projects. He said 
they should be stopped altogether by 2008.

The bank's response? It ignored its own report and carried on warming. The 
business climate, it seems, trumps the actual climate. Feel the heat.

While the elites huff and puff about Wolfowitz's alleged small corruption and 
ignore his organisation's proven immense corruption, there is something we - 
ordinary citizens - can do. In the summer of 2001, at the global justice 
protests in Genoa, I met Dennis Brutus, a former inmate of Robben Island prison 
alongside Nelson Mandela. He had been repelled by the bank's actions in South 
Africa, and started his protests against them by asking a very basic question: 
who owns the World Bank? It turns out we do. Ordinary people in the West - 
through their trade unions, churches, town councils, universities and private 
investments - own it. The bank raises nearly all its funds by issuing bonds on 
the private market. They are often held by socially minded institutions, the 
kind who signed up to Make Poverty History. So, Brutus realised, we have a 
simple power: to sell the bonds and bankrupt the World Bank. "We need to break 
the power of the World Bank over developing countries just as the disinvestment 
movement helped break the power of the apartheid regime in South Africa," he 

The campaign to make World Bank bonds as untouchable as apartheid-era 
investments has already begun. The cities of San Francisco, Boulder, Oakland and
Berkeley have sold theirs. Several US unions have also joined. Even this small 
ripple has caused anxiety within the bank about the threat to its "AAA" bond 

In the Genoa sun, as tear gas fired by the Italian police hissed in the 
background, Brutus told me: "I lived to see the death of political apartheid. 
Now I want to live to see the end of global financial apartheid."

This is the fight we should join. Not some petty squabble over which Washington 
technocrat is morally pure enough to lead the forces of subsidy-slashing and 


Escaping the Matrix website:  
cyberjournal website:             
Community Democracy Framework:
Subscribe cyberjournal list:            •••@••.•••  (send 
blank message)
Posting archives:                      
Moderator:                                         •••@••.•••  (comments