Human origins : The Archeological evidence


Richard Moore

    Before one rejects this thesis out of hand, it is well to
    understand that it is backed up by highly coherent, well
    researched, well developed archaeological data, documents,
    history and some two million items of recovered artifacts.



An Expanded Context For Genetic Exploration and Explanation 

A White Paper 

Addressed To: 
    Glenna C. Burmer, M.D., Ph.D 
    Eric Drexler, Ph.D 
    Ralph Merkle, Ph.D 
    Douglas B. Kell, Ph.D 
    Craig Venter, Ph.D 
    National Center For Genetic Resources 
    The Institute For Neural Cryobiology 
    Alcor Life Extension Foundation 

Neil Freer 
Author: Breaking the Godspell 
God Games: What Do You Do Forever? 


Geneticists, generally trained within some form of
evolutionary paradigm, assume it as the underlying context
within which they search and interpret. This paper, written by
a generalist for scientists, is submitted as a brief to inform
the reader of an archaeological paradigm, developed over a
century and a half, which renders outmoded, corrects and
subsumes both the Darwinian evolutionary and creationist
models, as related to human history, and provides an expanded,
fresh perspective on DNA research.

The most fundamental, critical obstacle blocking interpretive
and explanatory progress in the sciences - as well as our
educational, political and social processes -- is our lack of
a consensual definition of what a generic human being is, what
it is to be generically human. Theological, philosophical,
scientific and new age definitions rattle around in a criteria
vacuum. The creationist-evolutionist conflict is a single,
classic example of how effectively we have been Babel-factored
into ineffective argument without closure for decades.

The thesis of the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia Sitchin (1976),
provides a robust paradigm which affords the resolution of
this, objectively astounding, enervating and divisive problem
at the heart of western culture. It frees the discussions of
the science, ethics, and philosophy involved from the recycled
contexts, criteria and syllogistic gambits which have
stultified the western intellect for so long. Its startling
anthropological ramifications provide, not only a generic
definition of what a human is but, through a recovered and
restored history of our bicameral genome's initiation and
evolution, no less than a key to the decipherment and
interpretation of the human genome itself. Correlated with the
current data from the genome projects, general genetics,
cloning, and related areas it, further, furnishes vital clues
to an explanation of the anomalous fact of our presenting with
four thousand plus and counting genetic diseases, a possible
reason for so-called "junk" genes, and indicators as to why we
should possibly expect to find certain suppressed genes. A
potentially vital and startling contribution to human history
by the science of genetics, as a spin off of the current
ongoing genome research, is suggested.

Part 1: A synopsis of Sitchin's archaeological thesis 
Part 2: The evidential proof of Sitchin's thesis 
Part 3: The ramifications of that thesis; major objections answered 
Part 4: The genetic implications and clues afforded 

Part 1

A Synopsis of Sitchin's Archaeological Thesis

Zecharia Sitchin is one of two hundred Sumerian and Semitic
scholars on the planet who can read a clay tablet like you and
I can read this text. He published his first work, The Twelfth
Planet, in 1976 and, subsequently, another six volumes of the
Earth Chronicle Series. From his knowledge of Sumerian, the
Semitic and other ancient languages and his research on the
same archaeological and Biblical data and materials studied by
all archaeologists, acquired over the last one hundred and
fifty years, he put forth a radical thesis: the transcultural
"gods" known to all the ancient cultures (Sumerian: Anunnaki,
meaning "those who came down from the heavens") were not
mythological but real flesh and blood humanoid aliens, very
much like humans, who had come here from the tenth planet in
our solar system, Planet X in the popular press, called Nibiru
by the Sumerians, colonizing Earth some 432,000 years ago.
They subsequently genetically engineered our species, 200,000
years ago, originally as slave animals to work in their gold
mines, by crossing their own genes with those of Homo Erectus.
We became subservient partners with them and, eventually, they
phased off the planet leaving our species on our own.

Before one rejects this thesis out of hand, it is well to
understand that it is backed up by highly coherent, well
researched, well developed archaeological data, documents,
history and some two million items of recovered artifacts. A
key factor is our having reached a level of technological
advancement which allows us to understand high science and
technologies present in the past which, until only very
recently, could only seem fantastic - particularly genetic
engineering. As is the case with scientists in general,
archaeologists can adjust to internal and incidental shifts in
their consensual context but, when the paradigm itself is
threatened with replacement, there inevitably occurs a great
deal of very unscientific chest drumming and incisor display.
Obviously, the obstacle here is the word "alien". Consider
that the cardinal reason why the alien topic has been
considered the fringe "belief" of unbalanced personalities for
so long has been the relentless promotion of that idea by the
government for half a century. The Brookings Institution
(think tank) study (early '50's, commissioned by the
government) concluded that revelation of the alien presence
would cause serious disruption in the fundamentalist religions
and society and recommended against. But extra-solar system
aliens are not our focus here.

The Anunnaki, as depicted in hundreds of carvings, reliefs,
drawings, and descriptions in the recovered documents, are
quite like us, male and female, generally taller and huskier
than humans in those times, from within our solar system, at
home in our atmosphere, radically different than the alien
types allegedly from other solar systems. If we are half
Anunnaki, that should not be so surprising. At the time they
were on the planet, they apparently possessed only ballistic
rocketry for interplanetary travel, no anti-gravitic
technology yet developed.

Objections To This Thesis

Those trained in the sciences, accustomed to carefully crafted
protocols and rigorous proof will, no doubt, question this
paradigm in several ways.

Quite reasonably, it may be asked why the Sitchin paradigm has
not been embraced by the geneticists' academic counterparts in
archaeology, anthropology, and paleontology if the evidence is
as voluminous and robust as claimed. It may also be asked, Why
has this not been the known and taught history of our kind
through all the millennium, why should there have been
suppression and perversion of this knowledge? These questions
are best answered in historical context and perspective.

There was literally no such thing as the discipline known as
Archaeology in Western culture until the 1800's. The Roman
Church controlled and determined the view of the past. The
scholastic world, dominated by the Church, followed docilely.
Not until paleontological findings of millions of years forced
that view to be reevaluated and Schliemann, a wealthy German
merchant, refusing to believe that the ancient cities and
peoples were legend, dug up several stages of the city of
Troy, was a window into the past opened and the mythic view
questioned. Scientific Archaeology, as we know it, came into
existence only when academics reluctantly had to acknowledge
the past being dug up and collected by amateurs in the Middle
East. Archaeologists promptly came to be mistrusted and hated
by the religious institutions who feared revelations that
would contradict their teachings and the history of the Old

Most in the scientific world are familiar with the scientist,
Galileo, having to capitulate to the Inquisition to save his
own life, dying while under house arrest for holding to a
heliocentric view of the solar system, claiming to see planets
through his telescope. Fewer are aware of the fact that the
monk, Jordano Bruno, was burnt at the stake in Rome, through
the solicitousness of the Roman Church, only thirty six years
before the founding of Harvard University, for holding to the
Copernican view and claiming that there had to be other
planets and other civilizations in the cosmos.

No one in America, literally, had a Doctorate, at the time of
the founding of Harvard University, in 1636 by John Harvard.
Increase Mather, a president of Harvard, as a Dissenter, was
ineligible for a Doctorate from any English university because
all of them were controlled by the Church. Fourteen years
after the founding of Harvard, Bishop James Uusher published
his "Annales Vertis et Novi Testamenti" dating the beginning
of the world at 4004 B.C. One could be condemned as a heretic
for contraverting this doctrine by decree of the Church in
1654 and the stricture was not removed until 1952 (!) by Pope
Pius XII. The arithmetical wonder of this fact is that was
only 48 years ago. Consider that almost everything written in
this paper would have been branded as "heresy" and who knows
how DNA research would have been branded only a short time

As late as 1906, the Egyptian Exploration Fund, whose charter
stated it was set up to promote archaeologists whose work
would reinforce the Old and New Testament, refused to publish
the discovery of an Anunnaki gold processing plant on Mount
Horeb in the Sinai by Sir Flinders Petrie, the most
distinguished in his field at the time. When he published
privately they pulled his funding, had the book expunged from
the publisher's records and the British Library never
cataloged the work --- on one of the most important
discoveries in archaeology.(Sir Laurence Gardner: Bloodline Of
The Holy Grail, Genesis Of the Grail Kings )

The mythic interpretation has been promulgated by religions
because to recognize the Anunnaki as real would be to open the
door to a radical reinterpretation of the entire phenomenon of
religion and put into question the real identity of the very
deity at center of their belief system. To relegate all the
Anunnaki "gods" and their deeds --- except
Enlil/Jehovah/Yahweh, the God of the Judeo-Christian
religions, who was sublimated out of that category --- to
fictional, mythic, unreal status was supremely effective to
this end. It is through this millenniums-old tradition of
suppression, mythization and manipulative control that the
character, content and interpretation in the academic arena
has been set and remains, largely, even to this day. Very few
are going to make a rubber burning one-eighty over their Ph.D.
thesis in Mythology. In Archaeology, Anthropology, and
Paleontology, tenure tetanus prevents most from "going first"
to admit they have been wrong in a turn as significant and
profoundly revolutionary, perhaps even more so, than the
Darwinian shock. Collegiate colitis is all too frequent just
from contemplating having to contradict oneself in front of
students. Peer pressure finishes off all but the isolated
courageous academic or scientist here and there. Thomas Kuhn
(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions) is proven correct
again. If you want that Ph.D. diploma you will repeat what you
know you are supposed to believe and say. If you want that
job, that funding... The reason becomes apparent why the
academic arena has attempted to ignore this forbidden
archaeology and anthropology, and why a few more ruthless of
the academic power elite have tried to get Sitchin quick and
nasty ad hominem just outside the fact forum.

To this day, Anglican clergy still sit on the boards of
English universities. In America, the Constitution is only a
negative restraint on religious authoritarian domination Our
schools of higher "learning" still parade the trappings of the
medieval university on ceremonial occasions and,
unfortunately, all too often still in their limitation of
discussion to approved subjects. That the influence of
religion on science is still virulent is manifest in the
deference shown by politicians to religionists in decisions in
matters of genetic research.

The ordinary scientist, although perhaps open and cognizant of
the serious scientific objections that have been raised
against classic Darwinian theory, is reluctant to question or
reassess the evolutionary paradigm because of the erroneous
fear that creationism would be the only alternative. In
effect, the acceptance of the new paradigm is more difficult
because it supercedes and corrects both the creationist and
the Darwinian models. The Creationists were only half wrong
and the Evolutionists only half right: there was a creation
event but it was a genetic engineering process; there is an
evolutionary process but it was not linear from the time the
lightning hit the mud to us as the pinnacle of creation. It
was interrupted in our regard by the Anunnaki for their own
practical purposes. We shall be compelled to introduce an
additional category: a genetically synthesized species.( And,
if a voice out there is heard to say "Well, thank God for
Darwin regardless of how imperfect his work was.." many of us
will still not catch the irony in that statement....)

In our time, the position of the genetic specialist can become
quite personally disconcerting. Having been trained as an
undergraduate to uncritically accept some variation on the
Darwinian evolutionary theme, tending to look to fellow
scientists, particularly the archaeologists, biologists, and
anthropologists for answers to the "big" questions,
conditioned, if only subliminally, by religio-cultural
tradition, the geneticist finds it difficult enough to
decipher the genome much less consider a radically
revolutionary paradigm forcing a complete rethinking of the
planet. The purpose of this paper is to respectfully
facilitate just that process for the geneticist because the
new paradigm contains vital clues and vectors directly related
to the geneticist's quest.

The Demise of the Mythological Explanation of the Gods

Those still holding the mythological interpretation are in an
unenviable position. They find themselves having to hold that
the same citizens of the first civilizations who, they claim,
invented -- or hallucinated -- the gods through their
primitive imaginings and naive proto-scientific projections of
personality on the great forces of nature were the same
primitives who somehow could build the stupendous Giza
pyramid; somehow quarry, cut and move into place the one
thousand ton stones of the Baalbek "temple" (rocket platform)
which even our modern technology cannot begin to lift; somehow
know the great precessional cycle of the heavens, the
existence of all ten of the planets of our solar system and
how our solar system was formed (Enuma Elish document).

The physical locations of the ancient legends as mythic has
been gradually disproven beginning with the work of Schliemann
and completed with the re-discovery of all the ancient cities
and centers on all continents.

The events involving the "gods" of ancient times and the
technology attributed to them, previously considered as myth
and naive legend, have been gradually proven to be real,
beginning with the discovery of documents from the most
ancient cities and reinforced with the discovery of the great
library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh and the gradual
accumulation of some two million pieces of artifact and
document confirming those events in great detail.The discovery
of ooparts, (high tech tools, toys, artifacts, and technology
along with documentation of advanced scientific knowledge
ostensibly out of place in time) along with astronomical
knowledge of the entire solar system beyond our current level
has reinforced the negation of the mythic interpretation.

The interpretation of the "gods", the Anunnaki themselves, as
mythic, unreal beings (academic mythologists) and Jungian
archetypes (Joseph Campbell) and the relegation of them to
schizophrenic hallucination (Julian Jaynes) has been gradually
disproven beginning with the acknowledgment of the reality of
the events attributed to them; the discounting of the
arguments for their unreality due to the seeming fantastic
deeds attributed to them by the development of our technology
(rockets, lasers, radio communication, genetic engineering,
atomic and particle beam weapons) that duplicate those feats.
This interpretation has been implemented further by the
exploration and questions posed early by the German school,
pioneers like von Daniken and then completed by the
comprehensive and brilliant demonstrations of Sitchin and Sir
Laurence Gardner, the English historian and genealogist.

Now that we have begun by walking on the moon and exploring
the solar system and have probes going starward, the
possibility of an alien civilization coming here is taken for
granted and one coming here from inside our solar system
trivial, rather than unreal myth. "Mythinformation", after two
hundred years of failure, although still hiding behind tenure
in the university, is a dead issue.

The Essence of the Sitchin Paradigm

Working from the same archaeological discoveries, artifacts,
and recovered records as archaeologists and linguists have for
two hundred years, Sitchin propounds - proves, in the opinion
of this author --that the Anunnaki (Sumerian: "those who came
down from the heavens"; Old testament Hebrew, Anakeim,
Nefilim, Elohim; Egyptian: Neter), an advanced civilization
from the tenth planet in our solar system, splashed down in
the Persian gulf area around 432,000 years ago, colonized the
planet, with the purpose of obtaining large quantities of
gold. Some 250,000 years ago, the recovered documents tell us,
their lower echelon miners rebelled against the conditions in
the mines and the Anunnaki directorate decided to create a
creature to take their place. Enki, their chief scientist and
Ninhursag their chief medical officer, after getting no
satisfactory results splicing animal and Homo Erectus genes,
merged their Anunnaki genes with that of Homo Erectus and
produced us, Homo Sapiens, a genetically bicameral species,
for their purposes as slaves. Because we were a hybrid we
could not procreate. The demand for us as workers became
greater and we were genetically manipulated to reproduce.

Eventually, we became so numerous that some of us were
expelled from the Anunnaki city centers, gradually spreading
over the planet. Having become a stable genetic stock and
developing more precociously than, perhaps, the Anunnaki had
anticipated, the Anunnaki began to be attracted to humans as
sexual partners and children were born of these unions. This
was unacceptable to the majority of the Anunnaki high council
and it was decided to wipe out the human population through a
flood that was predictable when Nibiru, the tenth in our solar
system and the Anunnaki home planet, came through the inner
solar system again (around 12,500 years ago) on one of its
periodic 3600 year returns. Some humans were saved by the
action of the Anunnaki official, Enki, who was sympathetic to
the humans he had originally genetically created. For
thousands of years we were their slaves, their workers, their
servants, their soldiers in their political battles among
themselves.The Anunnaki used us in the construction of their
palaces (we retroproject the religious notion of temple on
these now), their cities, their mining and refining complexes
and their astronomical installations on all the continents.
They expanded from Mesopotamia to Egypt to India to South and
Central America and the stamp of their presence can be found
in the farthest reaches of the planet.

Around 6000 years ago they, probably realizing that they were
going to phase off the planet, began to gradually bring humans
to independence. Sumer, a human civilization, amazing in its
"sudden" and mature and highly advanced character was set up
under their tutelage in Mesopotamia. Human kings were
inaugurated as go-betweens, foremen of the human populations
answering to the Anunnaki. A strain of humans, genetically
enhanced with more Anunnaki genes, a bloodline of rulers in a
tradition of "servants of the people" was initiated (Gardner).
These designated humans were taught technology, mathematics,
astronomy, advanced crafts and the ways of advanced civilized
society (in schools, called now "mystery schools" but there
was no mystery about them). Gardner has brought to light the
fact that there exists a robust, highly documented,
genealogical, genetic history carrying all the way back to the
Anunnaki, possessed by the heterodox tradition of
Christianity, which is only now coming forward, no longer
gun-shy of the Inquisition. This tradition, preserving the
bloodline, is the one branded "heretical" and murderously
persecuted by the Roman Church. There were no Dark Ages for
this tradition, only for those whom the Church wanted to keep
in the dark about the real nature of human history and destroy
the bloodline, a direct threat to the power of the Bishops.

The Anunnaki became somewhat more remote from humans. By
around 1250 B.C. they had gone into their final phase-out
mode. The human population and the foremen kings, now left on
their own began to fend for themselves. For some three
thousand years, subsequently, we humans have been going
through a traumatic transition to racial independence.
Proprietary claims made by various groups of humans as to who
knew what we should be doing to get the Anunnaki to return or
when they returned, perpetuated the palace and social rituals
learned under the Anunnaki and sometimes disagreement and
strife broke out between them. Religion, as we know it, took
form, focused on the "god" or "gods", clearly and
unambiguously known to the humans who were in contact with
them as imperfect, flesh and blood humanoids, now absent. It
was only much later that the Anunnaki were eventually
sublimated into cosmic character and status and, later on,
conveniently mythologized. We have been dysfunctionally
looking to the sky where they went, waiting for Daddy to
return to make everything right and tell us what to do for
some three thousand years caught in cargo cult religions.

Part 2

What Evidence Supports the Sitchin Thesis?

The Astronomical Evidence

A key underpinning of the Sitchin paradigm is the existence,
now or in the past, of the tenth planet in our solar system,
the home planet of the Anunnaki with the size, orbit, and
characteristics described, as Sitchin has demonstrated, in the
Enuma Elish and corroborated by Harrington, former chief of
the U.S. Naval Observatory, now deceased.

Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930. Christie, of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, discovered Charon, Pluto's moon, in 1978. The
characteristics of Pluto derivable from the nature of Charon
demonstrated that there must still be a large planet
undiscovered because Pluto could not be the cause of the
residuals, the "wobbles" in the orbital paths of Uranus and
Neptune clearly identifiable. The IRAS (Infrared Astronomical
Satellite), during '83 -'84, produced observations of a tenth
planet so robust that one of the astronomers on the project
said that "all that remains is to name it" -- from which point
the information has become curiously guarded. In 1992
Harrington and Van Flandern of the Naval Observatory, working
with all the information they had at hand, published their
findings and opinion that there is, indeed, a tenth planet,
even calling it an "intruder" planet. The search was narrowed
to the southern skies, below the ecliptic. Harrington invited
Sitchin, having read his book and translations of the Enuma
Elish, to a meeting at his office and they correlated the
current findings with the ancient records.

The recovered Enuma Elish document, a history of the formation
of our solar system and more, says that, at the time when
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Uranus and Saturn were in
place, there was a Uranus sized planet, called Tiamat, in
orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Earth was not in place yet. A
large wandering planet, called Nibiru, was captured into the
system gravitationally. As it passed by the outer planets it
caused the anomalies of their moons, the tilting of Uranus on
its side, the dislodging of Pluto from its being a moon of
Saturn to its own planetary orbit. Its path bent by the
gravitational pull of the large planets, first its satellites
collided with the large planet Tiamat and, on a second orbit
through, Nibiru collided with Tiamat, driving the larger part
of it into what is now Earth's orbit to recongeal as Earth,
dragging its moon with it to become our Moon with all its
anomalies. The shattered debris of Tiamat's smaller part
became the asteroid belt, comets, and meteorites. The gouge of
our Pacific basin is awesome testimony to the collisional
event. Nibiru settled into a 3600 year elliptical retrograde
(opposite direction to all the other planets) orbit around our
sun, coming in through the asteroid belt region between Mars
and Jupiter at perigee and swinging far out past Pluto at
apogee. Harrington acknowledged that his information agreed
with all these details and the maps they each had drawn of the
orbits were almost indistinguishable. The current probable
location of Nibiru (Planet X, our tenth) estimated by both was
the same.

The Technological Evidence

Ooparts is the term used to describe the purportedly out of
place in time artifacts, toys, tools, technical devices,
depictions and documents which have come to light through
archaeological excavation or discovery. Almost everyone is
familiar, through published works or documentaries, with the
clay pot batteries still containing the electrodes from the
Iraqi desert dated at 2500 B.C., the flyable model airplane
from a pyramid tomb, the sophisticated machining of stone
requiring the most advanced techniques we know today, the 1000
ton precision cut blocks of stone in a temple foundation that
we could not even handle, an ancient relief frieze from an
Abydos temple depicting rockets, airplanes and even a
helicopter, etc. The most recent and quite amazing oopart is
the rediscovery of monoatomic gold by David Hudson
(Monoatomics are superconductors at room temperature, have
anti-gravitic properties and are only now being investigated
by the advanced physics community) Hudson's discovery,
correlated with the bringing to light, by Gardner, of the
suppressed discovery of the Anunnaki gold processing plant on
Mt. Horeb by Sir Flinders Petrie in 1889 demonstrates that the
monoatomics were already known at least 3000 years ago. These
ooparts coupled with evidence from many disciplines and the
historical records indicate that an advanced civilization
existed in those times possessing a high technology and that
that civilization was indeed the Anunnaki.

The Documentary Evidence

The recorded historical documentation for the existence and
deeds of the Anunnaki has become gradually available to us
only since the early 1800's. The excavation of the ancient
sites of Mesopotamia brought to light the amazingly advanced
civilization of Sumer and, with it, thousands of clay tablets
containing not only mundane records of commerce, marriages,
military actions and advanced astronomical calculation systems
but of the history of the Anunnaki themselves. It is clear
from these records that the Sumerians knew these aliens to be
real flesh and blood. The library of the ruler, Ashurbanipal,
at Nineveh was discovered to have burnt down and the clay
tablets held there were fired, preserving them for our
reading. One of the most impressive finds, in very recent
time, has been a sealed, nine foot by six foot room in Sippar
holding, neatly arranged on shelves, a set of some 400
elaborate clay tablets containing an unbroken record of the
history of those ancient times, a sort of time capsule. The
evidence is so overwhelming and robust that, if it weren't for
those with power enough to suppress, it would have been
accepted and our world view changed a century ago or, perhaps,

The Genetic Evidence

The recovered records place the location of the Anunnaki
laboratory where the first humans were literally produced in
east central Africa just above their gold mines. This falls
precisely on the map where the mitochondrial DNA "search for
Eve" places the first woman Homo-Sapiens and in the same time
frame. (The gold mining engineers of Africa have found 100,000
year old gold mines in that area.) The evidence for, and
description of advanced genetic engineering is all there in
the ancient documents. Our rapid progress from inception to
going to Mars soon, after only 250,000 years, does not
correspond to the million year periodicities of slow
evolutionary development of other species such as Homo Erectus
before us. As so many thinkers have pointed out, we are
radically and anomalously different, as discussed in part 3.

Two Definitive Protocols for Proving or Disproving the Sitchin

A straightforward approach to prove or disprove the Sitchin
paradigm is available from astronomy. A thorough, professional
search of our solar system should be able, with current
technology, to determine the existence or non-existence of a
tenth planet with the characteristics of size, orbit, orbital
periodicity, and declination from the ecliptic, as Sitchin has
determined from the translations of the ancient records and
particularly the Enuma Elish document. If that planet is not
in our solar system or no evidence can be found for an
ejection or cataclysmic destructive event then the Sitchin
paradigm falls. This search should be undertaken with highest
priority. The matter is sufficiently important to clearing up
our historical situation that the academic world should be
involved as well as the scientific community. It is the
opinion of this author and others that, in light of the
evidence already obtained through the use of the Pioneer 10
and 11 and two Voyager space craft, the Infrared Imaging
Satellite (IRAS, '83-84) and the clear and unequivocal
statements of Harrington when consulting with Sitchin, that
the search has already been accomplished, in fact that the
planet has already been found.

A second mode of proof or disproof is available through
genetics. We will shortly have the entire human genome read
out and its details sorted. That process, and the information
available as a result, should afford us the opportunity to
examine the entire genome for the evidence of the merging of
the two species' gene codes, Homo Erectus and Anunnaki, a
definitive way to prove or disprove Sitchin's thesis. It is in
this process, if proven, that the vital clues to the
interpretation of the genome lie as examined in Part 4. It is
the position of this author that, not only will the bicameral
nature of the code eventually be recognized but valuable clues
found through the new paradigm to a profound understanding of
the genome and the human.

Part 3

The Ramifications of the Sitchin Scenario

The First Factor: Background of Conditioning to Subservience

The overwhelming evidence from the Sitchin paradigm
demonstrates conclusively that we were genetically engineered
by the Anunnaki and treated as slaves and then limited
partners but always as subservient to them. The major
ramification (Neil Freer: Breaking the Godspell) of the
Sitchin explication is that "religion", as we have known it,
is the transmutation, sublimation of the Anunnaki-human
relationship of master-subject servitude, of slavery and then
limited, subservient partnership. Since then, we have been
going through phases of a traumatic transition to species
maturity and independence. The major characteristic of this
process has been the transmutation in all cultures of them, in
particular Enlil/Jehovah in Western culture, into a cosmic
deity, commonly called "God" in the Judeo-Christian tradition.
(Is this atheism? No, not as such. It simply is a long overdue
correction of some local, intra-solar system politics,
relatively rather pedestrian in cosmic perspective. Garden
variety atheism can now be understood as an early sign of
precocious species adolescent rebellion and questioning of the
authority of the obviously all too humanoid characteristics of
the particular local Nefilim "god" of the Hebrew tribe and
Christianity, Yahweh/Jehovah. The new paradigm, once the
ancient, subservient godspell is dispelled, simply frees us to
go one on one with the universe as our own evolutionary
artists and to seek directly whatever unthinkable or thinkable
ultimate principle is behind it.) In a later phase we have
mythologized them into unreal beings and then, more
"sophisticatedly" into psychological archetypes. Only with
cumulative evidence, our own evolved technology and restored
history through modern scholarship have we now been enabled to
grasp the true nature of our genetic creation, our godspell
conditioning, traumatic transition, and the opportunity to
emerge from species adolescence and amnesia into species
maturity. E.O. Wilson, the father of Sociobiology, while
rejecting religion as mythology, also sees it as hardwired in
the brain as a result of millennia of genetic evolutionary
programming. His opinion takes on a whole new meaning in the
context of the new paradigm: his description of this
predisposition of the human neurological system is an
excellent definition of the genetically engineered human
displaying the godspell mentality.

The Second Factor: The Babel Factor, The Splintering of the
Human Race Into Hostile Religions

So, down to our day, incredibly, we have remained still
Babel-factored for good crowd control, broken into tribes each
proprietarily telling the other that ours is the only accurate
tradition of what some particular "god" intended, what rules
to follow, what we should be doing to demonstrate we are still
loyal and docile servants. Sometimes we just kill each other
over it. And persecutions, Crusades, Jihads, Inquisitions,
evil empires, the saved and the damned, the martyr, the
infidel, the saint, the Protestant, the fundamentalist, the
atheist, became -- and remain.

The Third Factor: A Tradition of Absolutism, Suppression and

Modern scholarship, working on foundations laid as far back as
the German school, has reassessed the Old Testament. When the
Mesopotamian records began to be unearthed in the 1800's, it
was realized that the history revealed from 4000 B.C. forward,
was the source of the history of the Old Testament. The Jews,
allowed to be confined to captivity by the Babylonians by
their "god" Jehovah, had drawn on that history and committed
forgery (Sitchin) by rewriting it to their need to establish
Enlil/Jehovah as their supreme ruler. That history shows
clearly that two Anunnaki brothers, Enlil and Enki had always
been at odds with each other personally and politically. Enki
was the Anunnaki scientist who, together with his half-sister
scientist, Ninhursag, had created humans and had always been
favorable to them. Enlil had always had reservations about
humans and dominated them with severity.

Gardner has made the case that when the Old Testament referred
to The Lord (Adonai, Enki) it was when good things were being
done to or for the Hebrews. When terrible things were being
done or allowed to happen to them, the reference was always to
Jehovah(Yahweh, Enlil) and it was to Enlil's dominance that
they finally capitulated and whom they worshipped in fear. The
bloodline of human leaders, further enhanced with Anunnaki
genes, initiated by Enki (The Lord, Adonai), passed from Sumer
through Egypt to Israel through David and the messiahs
(anointed ones), fostered by the Essene communities as
revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. It was recognized but
treated ambiguously by the large faction of the Hebrews who
paid allegiance to Enlil.

The strain of Hellenistic, liberal, Judaism (Jesus was in the
bloodline) eventually became known as heterodox Christian was
opposed by the Pauline branch which eventually allied itself
with Rome and became the Roman Church. The orthodox Roman
Church perpetuated the Enlil type fear and subservience
tradition and, in its turn, suppressed, persecuted and
brutalized the human-centered strain of the bloodline.. The
reason why women have always been denigrated and suppressed by
the Roman Church is genetic: the bloodline was dependent on
transmission through the women of the line and any recognition
of them would be recognition of the line.

It is manifestly unjust that the geneticist is deprived of
this vital block of information about the genome due to the
preclusive attitude of the "bishops" still reigning in
archaeology. The restoration of our true human history clearly
affords resolution to the perennial Creationist-Evolutionary
as well as other conflicts and will lead to a consensual,
generic definition of a human and a planetary unity never
before experienced. By that release, it also reveals clues to
our current genetic questions. These are best approached
through the answers to the most obvious objections that have
been raised to the new paradigm.

Scientific Objections to the Thesis

How could the Anunnaki, clearly described as comfortable in
earth gravity and atmosphere, very similar to current humans
in all ways, have evolved on a planet within our solar system
whose orbital apogee takes it into the deep cold of space for
much of its orbit?

The ancient records repeatedly describe Nibiru as a "radiant"
planet. This may be understood as having a high core
temperature. Although controversial, there is also
astrophysical opinion that a large body in elongated orbit is
constantly tending toward circular orbit and this causes
stresses in the body that could generate a good deal of heat.
That their planet is gradually cooling, may be indicated by
Sitchin's interpretation of their colonizing Earth (contains
most of the gold identifiable in the solar system) for the
purpose of obtaining large quantities of gold for molecular
seeding of their atmosphere with a reflective gold shielding.
Pertinent here is Harrington's confident statement to Sitchin
that it is "a nice, good planet, could be surrounded by gases,
probably has an atmosphere and could support life like ours".
The sunlight level there might be quite different than on
earth. Although not always, the Anunnaki were often depicted
or sculpted with what seem to be obviously sunglasses.

If, however, the Anunnaki evolved on a radically different
planet from earth under quite different conditions to which to
adapt, why should they have turned out to be so identical to
to human species? Sitchin's answer is based on the collisional
event between the intruder planet, Nibiru, and the planet
Tiamat, the residual part of which recongealed into the Earth
after being driven into current Earth orbit. That the two, or
at least one, of the colliding planets was sufficiently
developed to have evolved basic organic compounds, perhaps
even simple life, the cross-seeding of everything from amino
acids to more complicated organic compounds or even primitive
organisms, could account for the evolutionary similarity.
Although this author finds it a reasonable hypothesis, even
trivial, that advanced civilizations would be capable of
crossing extremely different genomes, perhaps with even
radically different bases, the cross-seeding theory can
account for the apparent relative ease with which the Anunnaki
impinged their genes on the genes of Homo Erectus. The
Anunnaki skill level, 200,000 years ago, is indicated well by
the recorded fact that, in early trials, they succeeded in
crossing animal genes with Homo Erectus genes, obtained living
hybrids but never a satisfactory product which led them to
modify Homo Erectus genes with their advanced genes.

This provides a comprehensive context in which to understand
and explain the enigmatic facts of our being contemporaneous
with Neanderthals or even preceding them and other
anthropological anomalies --- at least within the Darwinian
model -- of our species existence. We have 46 chromosomes,
primates have 48 and the fusion of the second and third
chromosomes in primates is a mystery. Even today the
anthropological sector is scrambling to find a viable ancestor
species for us, Homo Erectus is currently being promoted; we
showed up too suddenly in the chronology of the fossil record;
our 4000 plus genetic diseases are a total enigma.

We present with very many startling, obvious differences from
primates, and those differences, suddenly appearing in our
species, are radical: we have foreheads, hardly any brow
ridges, eye sockets far more rectangular than round;
relatively tiny nasal passages; small flat mouths and a chin;
far less muscular strength and bone density; our skin, sweat
process and glands, body hair, throats, and salt management
are completely different. Human females don't have an estrus
cycle. We are bipedal. Our brains are remarkably different to
say the very least.

If our genome is estimated as 95% to 98% similar to the
chimpanzee, how could there be a melding of the Homo Erectus
and Anunnaki genomes, or impingement of the advanced code on
the lesser advanced one detectable? The author suggests that
this is a major question probably answerable only by the
geneticists open-minded enough to attack it. The resolution of
that question should provide rich additional clues in itself.

Part 4 

Significant Genetic Ramifications, Clues and Indicators
Afforded by the Sitchin Thesis and its Restoration of Our True

If it is taken as archaeologically and historically
demonstrated that we are a genetically engineered, bicameral
species, the product of genetically melding two racial
genomes, the past becomes a rich archive of anthropological,
technical, historical and especially genetic information and
data. Just as the reluctant acknowledgement that ancient
records from the Sumerian or Chinese civilizations contained
accurate astronomical observations and data opened up a
valuable resource to modern astronomers, so the history of our
species' genetic creation in a laboratory pinpointed on the
map of east central Africa precisely where the mitochondrial
"search for Eve" locates the first human female(s), opens an
astounding resource to modern geneticists.

The most important advantage is that, enabled with this
knowledge and perspective, geneticists can begin to understand
and decipher and interpret our genome with the tremendous
advantage of working within a robust context providing major
clues as to what to look for and where to look and why.

The ancient records of why, when, and how we were genetically
engineered make it abundantly clear that we were brought into
existence as a subordinate species, a slave species to relieve
the Anunnaki miner echelons. (The essential, detailed
documentation through translations and illustrations of the
actual genetic processes (in vitro; cloning, etc. ) used by
the Anunnaki is found in Sitchin, The Twelfth Planet, chapter
12) It is specified pointedly that, although the Anunnaki
lived, literally, extended lifetimes of thousands of our years
(either because of the way they themselves had evolved on
their home planet or, perhaps, because of their genetic
engineering capabilities to achieve that longevity, and
possibly through their use of the monoatomic form of gold)
they deliberately did not bestow that potential on us. In
fact, it is mentioned clearly that they deliberately withheld
it. This deliberate withholding of immortality and, perhaps,
even a shortening of longevity, may provide a major clue to
our aging process and mortality. (Sociologically, this is the
reason why immortality, in one form or another, has become the
sublimated reward for a good life in all the religions.). From
the details given in the ancient records, it is conceivable
that some engineering of the process was executed deliberately
to suppress certain characteristics to make better and docile

If they were interested only in engineering what clearly
amounted to disposable units then it may reasonably be
inferred that the quality and completeness of the engineering
would not have to have been taken to the maximum. This is, in
the opinion of this author, the basis for the four thousand
plus genetic diseases and defects we present. It has been
argued theoretically that, although the vast majority of the
species on this planet present with only a few typical genetic
diseases, we show 4000 because of the relative complexity of
our organism. But we are not that much more complex
genetically than even the higher primates and this argument
does not hold.

Several significant details in the records of our genetic
genesis may hold clues. It is recounted that two kinds of
females were created, those who would bear children and those
who would not. Determining genetically how we, as sterile
mutants when first created, were manipulated to be able to
procreate may be a major lead. Finally, knowing that an
advanced bloodline of humans, enhanced by additional Anunnaki
genes, was created around 4000 B.C. is even more valuable a
clue since that bloodline has been carefully nurtured and
protected through to our day and, therefore, available for
investigation and analysis and comparison.

A primary practical tool would be the devising of a protocol
through which a crossing of the two gene codes might be
recognized. The ancient records could be interpreted to mean
either a complete melding of the two codes or, alternatively,
the impingement of selected Anunnaki genes on the Homo Erectus
code to tweak up the more primitive code to at least a
condition of intelligence and physical competence to handle
the mining of gold. It is possible that in some 200,000 years
of our existence the accommodation between the codes has
smoothed and recognition may be difficult indeed. The
obtaining of some robust Homo Erectus DNA samples from fossils
would be a great help. It may evolve that, in working on the
genetic diseases from the perspective of the genome being
bicameral, those defects may yield an indirect key in some
pattern or mechanism that indicates the nature and extent of
the splicing of the codes.

During the genetic investigation now in process, therefore, it
would be valuable indeed for geneticists, at the minimum, to
be constantly inspecting the results of the decipherment for
signs of the genetic merging, and to develop protocols to
determine such, if needed, as well as following the clues
mentioned herein. By doing so, interpretations and
explanations may possibly be facilitated, progress accelerated
and a far more comprehensive overview of the genome achieved.
The information gained would, reciprocally, be a major,
pivotal, invaluable resultant spin-off contribution to our
species' evolutionary, anthropological, and cultural generic

Selected Reading 

Freer, Neil, Breaking the Godspell (New Falcon Publications, '87, '90', '93, 
 God Games: What Do You Do Forever? (The Book Tree, '98, '99) 

Gardner, Sir Laurence, Bloodline of the Holy Grail (Element Books, '96) 
 Genesis of the Grail Kings (Bantam Press, '99) 

Sitchin, Zecharia, The Twelfth Planet 
The Stairway to Heaven 
The Wars of Gods and Men 
The Lost Realms 
When Time Began 
Genesis Revisited 
(All Bear & Co. Hardback or Avon Paperback, '76-) 

Recommended reading order: 
Sitchin: in order listed 
Freer: Breaking the Godspell 
Gardner: in order listed 
Freer: God Games 

The Author 

This paper is copyrighted by Neil Freer, but the author 
hereby grants permission that it be freely downloaded,
translated, printed, copied, quoted, distributed in any
appropriate media providing only that it not be altered in
any way in text or intent and the author is properly


"Apocalypse Now and the Brave New World"

List archives:

Subscribe to low-traffic list: