On May 9, Vice Premier Wang Qishan, who was in charge of financial
affairs, sounded wary when he stressed the importance of the country’s
financial security in the face of the speculative flood.
“Financial security deals directly with overall national economic and
social stability and the fundamental interests of the people. Therefore,
safeguarding financial security is the top priority among all financial
affairs,” Wang told an economic forum in the financial hub of Shanghai.
Unprecedented capital inflows test Chinese regulators
www.chinaview.cn 2008-07-01 17:33:02
by Lin Jianyang
BEIJING, July 1 (Xinhua) — China has taken a series of increasingly
aggressive measures in the past several months to blunt the impact of
so-called “hot money,” amid the explosive growth of its foreign exchange
reserves, which have soared beyond what can be explained by trade and
investment flows.
The inflows have been so massive as to raise alarms over the country’s
financial security.
According to the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), as of
the end of May, forex reserves stood at 1.797 trillion U.S. dollars.
During the first five months of 2008, forex reserves increased by 18.7
percent year-on-year, or 268.7 billion U.S. dollars, SAFE figures showed.
Where is all that money coming from, and where is it going?
HOW MUCH IS “HOT MONEY”?
What caught the attention of analysts was that forex reserves jumped at
the same time as the current-account surplus and foreign direct investment
(FDI) into the fixed-asset field declined year-on-year.
Set against the increased forex reserves in the first five months of
this year, there was the 78.02 billion U.S. dollars represented by the trade
surplus, which was down 8.6 percent year-on-year.
Another 42.78 billion U.S. dollars was connected with FDI in the first
five months, which soared nearly 55 percent year-on-year. But FDI going into
fixed assets (longer-term investment), actually fell 3.5 percent in the same
period.
Jiang Zheng, a macro-economist at a Beijing-based securities firm, has
closely tracked these figures and analyzed the data.
Deducting the trade surplus and the FDI, there was an unexplained 147.9
billion U.S. dollars in the forex reserve increase figure, which Jiang and
numerous other analysts consider to be “hot money”, which is usually defined
as short-term global speculative funds moving among financial markets in
search of the highest short-term return.
The government doesn’t release official figures on this category of
funds; in fact, it doesn’t even use the term “hot money”. So analysts can
only make estimates.
Jiang said the “hot money” figures deduced by analysts might even be
underestimates. “There is a tricky decline among the FDI figures, i.e. the
drop of fixed-asset investment,” he explained.
“Foreign direct investment in the first five months soared about 55
percent. But strangely, fixed-asset FDI in the first five months fell 3.5
percent from last year’s figure,” Jiang said.
Jiang said it appeared that some speculative money had managed to move
into China in the guise of FDI.
But there are many other channels for “hot money” to flow into China.
These include falsified international trade with over-invoiced exports and
underground private banks, according to Jiang.
Jiang and other analysts maintained that as much as 600 billion U.S.
dollars in “hot money” had surged into the country, most of it after 2005.
Jiang said he was somewhat surprised at the scale of “hot money” inflows
in the first five months of this year. The monthly inflow of “hot money”
from January-May was estimated at 35 billion U.S. dollars, more than double
the 15 billion U.S. dollar figure for the same period last year, Jiang said.
In April alone, deduction showed that a record 50.2 billion U.S. dollars
of “hot money” poured into China, he said.
WHY CHINA AND WHERE DO THEY INVEST?
Many will ask why such huge sums of “hot money” have been continuing to
flood into China and where it is going.
Li Yang, head of the Financial Research Institution at the Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences, said the disparity between Chinese and U.S.
interest rates, the appreciation of the Chinese currency (the yuan) since
2005 and the profits from the Chinese capital and real estate markets were
the main causes of the unstoppable “hot money” inflows.
Since the start of the global financial crisis, which surfaced last
summer with problems in the U.S. subprime mortgage market, the U.S. Federal
Reserve has since September cut interest rates seven times to stimulate
economic growth. The Fed funds target rate has fallen from 5.25 percent to
the current 2 percent.
In contrast, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC, the central bank), hiked
interest rates six times between March and December 2007 to cool economic
growth, with the one-year deposit rate rising from 2.52 percent to the 4.14
percent.
These opposing actions created a disparity that helped to lure global
speculative money to into China at an accelerated pace this year.
Another major lure for “hot money” was the continuously appreciating
yuan.
In July 2005, China abandoned a decade-old peg to the U.S. dollar and
allowed its currency to appreciate by 2.1 percent. Since then, the yuan has
strengthened further, mostly slowly, and risen nearly 17 percent against the
U.S. dollar.
The appreciation of the yuan, coupled with the simultaneous depreciation
of the U.S. dollar, has also prompted “hot money” to bet on the yuan’s
further appreciation.
“The combination of the interest rate disparity and the yuan’s
appreciation will ensure a profit rate in excess of 10 percent for ‘hot
money’,” Li Yang said.
The other major incentive for “hot money” was the chance to profit from
China’s markets, mostly stock and real estate.
Many economists and analysts like Jiang said that the booming Chinese
stock market between 2006 and late 2007 and soaring housing prices since
late 2005 were, in part, created by global speculative money.
Stock and property returns have been poor lately: share prices have
plunged since peaking late last year and the real estate market has faced
uncertainties since China began to impose tight macro-economic controls.
So speculative money has sought greener pastures, with some simply being
deposited into banks.
Jiang said household and business deposits had grown fast in the first
five months.
According to the PBOC, as of the end of May, the balance of deposits in
reminbi accounts in domestic financial institutions reached 43.11 trillion
yuan, up nearly 20 percent over last year’s figure.
“The consumer price index has risen more than 8 percent every month on
average this year, higher than the interest rate, but deposits are soaring.
It is very probable that ‘hot money’ is flowing into banks,” Jiang said.
His judgement was echoed by investors.
Wang Chenyang, who manages a 12-billion-U.S.-dollar hedge fund from Wall
Street, told Xinhua that the best investment choice at present was to
convert money from the U.S. dollar to the renminbi and deposit it into banks
in the Chinese mainland.
Wang said his Chinese friends who work in New York had made such
investments with help from their relatives in China.
Similar scenarios took place in Hong Kong, where residents traveled to
neighboring Guangdong Province and converted money from the Hong Kong
dollar, which has also been depreciating, into the yuan, depositing the
proceeds into Chinese mainland banks.
TOO HOT TO HANDLE?
As many in China believe that “hot money”, as a major factor in capital
flight, was largely responsible for the financial crises in Southeast Asia
in 1997 and one that began in Vietnam this year, continued speculative
capital inflows had raised strong concern in China.
Mei Xinyu, an economist at the Ministry of Commerce, warned that “hot
money” inflows would create problems and put pressure on China’s monetary
policy.
“Moreover, capital flight will disrupt the normal operation of the
country’s financial system and have an immense impact on China’s financial
order,” he added.
Zhang Ming, an economist at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,
echoed Mei’s views, saying: “If there was capital flight, it would cause a
significant impact on the international payments for China and would
probably result in deficits in both the current and capital accounts.
“We should pull out all the stops to contain further inflows of ‘hot
money’, and make full preparations for possible capital flight,” Zhang
warned.
In addition, analysts said the inflows of speculative money were partly
to blame for creating excess liquidity and stoking inflationary pressure in
the Chinese economy.
In the first five months of 2008, the CPI, the main gauge of inflation,
rose 8.1 percent year-on-year. The CPI for February hit a 12-year high of
8.7 percent.
Amid these concerns, China is taking no chances. Various departments,
particularly the PBOC, have stepped up efforts to ward off the risks of “hot
money”.
The central bank has since last year frequently employed two tools to
curb excess liquidity — raising commercial banks’ reserve-requirement
ratios (RRR) or issuing bills.
In particular, the central bank has hiked the RRR at an unprecedented
frequency.
In 2007, the PBOC raised the ratio 10 times, which lifted it from 9.0
percent last January to 14.5 percent as of December. The central bank had
raised the RRR only five times over six years since 2000.
This year, the central bank continued to employ this tool. The latest
move was on June 9, when it raised the RRR by 0.5 percentage point (to take
effect on June 15) and another 0.5 percentage points (effective on June 25).
The rise on June 25 was the sixth this year, and it brought the ratio to
a record 17.5 percent. With it, the central bank said it had received 1.23
trillion yuan in required reserves from the commercial banks so far this
year.
Jiang said the amount of the required reserves, along with bill issues,
enabled the central bank to successfully ward off the risks created by the
excess liquidity owing to “hot money” inflows.
The unprecedented measures taken by the central bank, however, created a
dilemma for the Chinese economy: the PBOC was flush with liquidity while
commercial banks, equities and the property market faced tight conditions,
according to Jiang.
FINANCIAL SECURITY A PRIORITY
While China moved to cope with hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars of
speculative money that had already poured into the country, it was taking
much stricter measures to monitor the capital flows and prevent more “hot
money” from flooding in.
In mid-April, the State Council, China’s Cabinet, called a special
meeting to discuss the seemingly unstoppable capital inflows.
The meeting was also attended by all concerned central government
departments, such as the Finance Ministry, the central bank, the China
Banking Regulatory Commission and SAFE.
According to the Shanghai-based China Business News, ahead of the
meeting, several central governmental departments had received a special
report, more than 200 pages long, about the “hot money” inflows.
On May 9, Vice Premier Wang Qishan, who was in charge of financial
affairs, sounded wary when he stressed the importance of the country’s
financial security in the face of the speculative flood.
“Financial security deals directly with overall national economic and
social stability and the fundamental interests of the people. Therefore,
safeguarding financial security is the top priority among all financial
affairs,” Wang told an economic forum in the financial hub of Shanghai.
Wang said the government would take more measures to improve management
of forex reserves, strengthen supervision of trans-border capital flows and
crack down on financial crimes.
Days after Wang’s remarks, on May 21, SAFE issued a notice ordering all
banks in the mainland to file reports on all renminbi accounts opened by
non-resident individuals and non-resident institutions.
SAFE said the measure was meant to “improve statistics on international
payments”.
According to SAFE, a new system that enables real-time monitoring of the
flow of foreign exchange is in the pipeline. The system is mainly an
Internet-based data exchange mechanism among SAFE, banks, enterprises and
accounting firms.
SAFE also said it was actively seeking to strengthen administration of
foreign exchange receipts and trade settlements.
Hu Xiaolian, SAFE administrator, said recently that it was necessary to
check the authenticity of foreign investments and trading activities. By
doing so, SAFE aimed to prevent inflows of “hot money” in the guise of FDI
or trade.
China faced with a bigger challenge of guarding against the impact of
short-term global speculative funds, Hu added, alluding to “hot money”.
Editor: Amber Yao