Generals revolt against Bush’s escalation plans


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Stop the Presses: Press Ignores the Generals'

A. Alexander, December 22nd, 2006

The Joint Chiefs of Staff and practically every actively serving General 
strongly opposes George W. Bush's proposed Iraq "Surge" Plan, but you've 
probably not heard too much about the Generals' general discontent. The average 
American probably hasn't heard about it, because the media only barely reported 
on the Generals' mutiny. True to form, the press dutifully ignored the Generals'
concerns, but widely reported on the White House's insistence that the Generals'
generally didn't disagree with the President.... However, in the event that the 
Generals, who don't disagree with the President, do decide to disagree with the 
President's Iraq "Surge" Plan - the President doesn't care, because he's "The 

The presses ignoring of the Generals' disagreement with "The Decider," even 
continued when Rumsfeld's very Rumsfeld-like "stay the course" replacement, 
Robert Gates, traveled to Iraq and was told by the "commanders" on the ground 
that they too, disagreed with "The Decider's" Iraq "Surge" Plan. Indeed, these 
were very dark days for "The Decider" and his dream of escalating the Iraq War. 
Fortunately for "The Decider," the press was mostly ignoring the Generals' 
collective revolt.

Then, almost like Manna from heaven, Gates met with a group of rear-echelon 
non-rate enlisted personnel in Iraq who, according to widely reported press 
accounts, fully agreed with "The Deciders" desire to send a "surge" of troops to
Baghdad. Yes, there were a total of fifteen rear-echelon E-1s, E-2s, and E-3s 
(Privates, Private First Classes, and Lance Corporals) who all, to a man and 
woman, agreed with the President's Iraq "Surge" Plan. Stop the presses, people! 
"The Troops Agree with the President's Iraq 'Surge' Plan," blared the headlines.
What's that? No, the Generals don't agree with the President, but who cares what
they think ... fifteen fresh-out-of-boot camp enlisted people agree with George 
W. Bush, and that is what REALLY matters!

Needless to say, while they continued to ignore the Generals' mutiny, America's 
fine press was all over the comments made by fifteen fresh-out-of-boot camp 

The sheer absurdity of the Press ignoring the Generals' disagreement with "The 
Decider" and instead, focusing on the few rear-echelon non-rate enlisted 
personnel who were only months away from boot camp is this: In all the world, 
few know less about what the hell is going on -- big picture -- than do 
rear-echelon E-1s, E-2s, and E-3s in the U.S. military. The simple fact of the 
matter is that these "troops" Gates met with probably couldn't have said with 
certainty -- having had lunch with the Defense Secretary -- what they were going
to be having for dinner that night. That isn't a knock on rear-echelon 
non-rates; that is just a fact of military life. They are the proverbial 
mushrooms...kept in the dark and fed a boat load of crap.

Now, if the press wanted to find out what was really happening in the actual 
war, they could go and talk to the non-rate enlisted guys stuck in the "shit" on
the frontlines. Even that information, however, could only be applied to that 
particular frontline non-rate's area of operation. For the big picture, a 
reporter would have to talk to GRUNTs throughout the country. But for reporters 
to more-or-less ignore the opinion of Generals and commanders regarding the 
President's Iraq "Surge" Plan and instead, be the megaphone for a few 
rear-echelon non-rates only months out of boot camp; that is simply 
unconscionable. Sadly, for America's fine press, it is only too typical.

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy