False flag: NATO’s Hidden Terrorism


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

NATO¹s Hidden Terrorism

Message #39980 of 40041
Re: [cia-drugs] NATO¹s Hidden Terrorism

You should see the new movie "Bug" with Ashley Judd and Harrick Connick.  The 
hero states exactly this theory

-----Original Message-----
From: norgesen
To: •••@••.•••
Sent: Sat, 26 May 2007 7:12 am
Subject: [cia-drugs] NATO¹s Hidden Terrorism

NATOâ¤s Hidden Terrorism
by Silvia Cattori*
22 JANUARY 2007

Zurich (Suisse)


Daniele Ganser, professor of contemporary history at Bale University (France) 
and chairman of the ASPO - Switzerland, published a landmark book about 
"NATOâ¤s Secret Armies." According to him, during the last 50 years the United 
States have organized bombings in Western Europe that they have falsely 
attributed to the left and the extreme left with the purpose of discrediting 
them in the eyes of their voters. This strategy is still present today, 
inspiring fear for the Islam and justifying wars on oil.


Daniele Ganser

Silvia Cattori: Your book about NATOâ¤s Secret Armies [1] explains that the 
strategy of tension [2] and the False Flag terrorism [3] imply great dangers. 
It teaches us how NATO - together with the intelligence services or the West 
European countries and the Pentagon - utilised secret armies during the Cold 
War, hired spies among the extreme right wing, and organized terrorist acts for 
which they blamed the left. Becoming aware of this, we can wonder about what is 
likely to happen today behind our back.

Daniele Ganser: It is extremely important to understand what the strategy of 
tension truly represents the way it works nowadays. This can help us clarify the
present and to see more clearly to what extent it is still in action. Only a few
people know what the expression â¤strategy of tension⤠means. It is very 
important to talk about it, to explain it. It is a tactic that involves carrying
out criminal acts and attributing them to someone else. By the term 
â¤tensionâ¤, we mean emotional tension, all that which creates a feeling of 

By â¤strategy⤠we make reference to that which increases peopleâ¤s fear in 
regard to a determined group. These secret structures of NATO had been equipped,
financed and trained by the CIA, in coordination with the M16 (the British 
secret service), to fight against the Army of the Soviet Union in a case of war,
but also according to the information to which he have access today, to commit 
terrorist acts in several countries [4]. That is how, since the 70s, the 
Italian secret services have been using these armies to foment terrorist 
attacks, with the purpose of causing fear among the population, and later, to 
accuse the communists of being the authors. The strategy of tension was designed
to serve the purpose or discrediting, weakening and stopping communism from 
reaching executive power.

Silvia Cattori: To learn what it means is one thing. But it is still difficult 
to believe that our government could have let NATO, the West European 
intelligence agencies and the CIA act in such a way that could threaten their 
own citizens⤠security!

Daniele Ganser: NATO was at the core of this clandestine network linked to 
terror; the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC) and the Allied Clandestine 
Committee (ACC) were two substructures of the Atlantic Alliance, and they are 
clearly identified today. But, now that this has been established, it is still 
hard to know who was doing what. There are not any documents proving who was at 
the head, who organized the strategy of tension, how NATO, the West European 
intelligence services, the CIA, M16, and the hired terrorists among the extreme 
right, distributed each otherâ¤s roles. The only certainty that we have is that
there was, inside these clandestine structures, some elements that used the 
strategy of tension. The terrorists from the extreme right have explained in 
their statements that it was NATOâ¤s secret services that had supported them in
this clandestine war. But when we ask for explanations from some members of the 
CIA or NATO - which I have done for many years - they limit themselves to say 
that it could be possible that a few criminal elements might have managed to 
avoid control.

Silvia Cattori: Were these secret armies active in every Western European 

Daniele Ganser: In my research, I put forward evidence that these secret armies 
not only existed in Italy, but also in all Western Europe: in France, Belgium, 
The Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, Spain, Portugal, 
Austria, Switzerland, Greece, Luxembourg and Germany. In the beginning, we 
thought that there existed only one guerrilla-structured organization, and 
therefore, that all these secret armies had participated in the strategy of 
tension, and therefore, in terrorist acts. However, it is important to know that
not all these secret armies have been involved in attacks, and to understand 
what differentiated them.

What appears to be clear today, is that NATOâ¤s clandestine structures, usually
called â¤Stay Behind groupsâ¤Â [5], were created in the beginning to act as a 
guerrilla in case of an occupation of Western Europe by the Soviet Union. The 
United States stated that the guerrilla networks were necessary to overcome the 
lack of preparedness of the countries attacked by Germany.

Several of the countries that were occupied by the Germans, like Norway, wanted 
to learn the lessons of their incapacity to resist the occupier, and they said 
to themselves that, in case of a new occupation, they had to be better prepared,
to have another option at hand and to count with a secret army in case that the 
official one were to be defeated. Inside these secret armies, there were honest 
people, sincere patriots, who only wanted to defend their countries from an 

Silvia Cattori: If I understand well, these Stay Behind groups, whose original 
goal was to be prepared in case of a Soviet invasion, have been deviated from 
that goal and were reorganised to defeat the left. From that, it is difficult to
understand why the left parties have not investigated this or denounced this 

Daniele Ganser: When we take the case of Italy, it appears that, every time that
the communist party has interviewed the government to find an explanation about 
the secret army that was operating in this country under the coded name of 
Gladio [6], there was never any answer, under the pretext that it was a 
â¤state secretâ¤. It wasnâ¤t until 1990 that Giulio Andreotti [7] recognised
the existence of Gladio and its direct links with NATO, the CIA, and M16Â [8]. _
It is also during that time that the judge Felice Casson was able to prove that 
the true author of the bombing in Peteano in 1972, that had shocked Italy, and 
that had been attributed up to that moment to the extreme left militants, was 
Vincenzo Vinciguerra, linked to â¤Ordine Nuovoâ¤, a group of the extreme right
wing. Vinciguerra avoided blame for the bombing in Peteano with the help of the 
Italian secret services. Vinciguerra also spoke about the existence of this 
secret army, Gladio. He explained that, during the Cold War, these clandestine 
acts had caused the death of women and children [9]. He stated as well that 
this secret army controlled by NATO, had branches all around Europe. When this 
information was released, there was a political crisis in Italy. And it is 
thanks to the investigations of the judge Felice Casson that we got to know 
about NATOâ¤s secret armies.

In Germany, when in 1990 the SPDs (German Social Democrat Partisans) became 
aware that in their country - as well as in all the other European countries - 
there was a secret army, and that this structure was linked to the German secret
services, they loudly denounced it as a scandal and accused the Christian 
democratic Party (CDU). This party reacted by saying: "If you accuse us, we are 
going to say that, you too, together with Willy Brandt, you have been involved 
in this conspiracy". This happened at the same time as the first elections of 
the reunified Germany, which the SPD hoped to win. The leaders of the SPD 
understood that that was not a good electoral subject; in the end, the story was
twisted in such a way as to make the existence of these secret armies seem 

In the European Parliament, in November 1990, many members exclaimed that the 
existence of such clandestine armies could not be tolerated and that the 
European people needed to know the true origin of terrorist acts and that an 
inquiry was needed. Therefore, the European Parliament wrote a complaint to NATO
and to president George Bush Senior. But nothing was done. It is only in Italy, 
Belgium and Switzerland that there have been public queries. And they are the 
only three countries that have set some order in this subject, and that have 
published a report about their secret armies.

Silvia Cattori: What about today ? Are these secret armies still active? Is it 
possible that there exist secret national structures which escape the control of
each State?

Daniele Ganser: For a historian, it is difficult to answer that question. We 
havenâ¤t got an official report of each country. In my books, I analyse some 
facts that I can prove. Concerning Italy, there is a report stating that the 
secret army Gladio has been destroyed. About the existence of the secret army 
P26 in Switzerland, a report was also issued by the Parliament, in November 
1990. Therefore, these clandestine armies, which had stocked explosives in 
hidden places everywhere in Switzerland, have been dissolved.

But in the other countries, nothing was done. In France, while president 
François Mitterrand stated that all that belonged to the past, we discovered 
later that these secret structures had always been present when Giulio Andreotti
suggested that the French president was lying: "You say that the secret armies 
do not exist anymore; but, during 1990â¤s secret meeting in the autumn, you, 
the French, were also present; donâ¤t say that this doesnâ¤t exist anymore." 
Mitterrand became quite angry with this Andreotti because, after this 
revelation, he was forced to rectify his statement. Later, the head of the 
French secret services, admiral Pierre Lacoste, confirmed that these secret 
armies existed in France as well, and that France had also been involved in 
terrorist attacks. [10]. It is therefore difficult to say whether all this has 
been solved or not. And, even if the Gladio structures have been dissolved, new 
armies might have been created, still utilizing this technique of the strategy 
of tension and the False flags.

Silvia Cattori: Can we speculate that, after the fall of the USSR, the United 
States and NATO have continued developing the strategy of tension and of the 
false flags in other fronts?

Daniele Ganser: My research is based in the period of the Cold War in Europe. 
But it is known that there have also been false flags in other places, where the
States⤠responsibility was proved. For example: the Iran bombings in 1953, for
which the communist Iranians were blamed at first. So it happened that the CIA 
and the Mi6 had used some agents provocateurs to orchestrate the overthrow of 
Mohammed Mossadeghâ¤s administration, within the framework of the war, to 
control the oil. Another example: the bombings in Egypt, in 1954, for which the 
Muslims were accused first. It was proved later that, in what was called the 
Lavon affair [11], it was the agents of Mossad who had been the perpetrators. 
This time, it was for Israel to stop the British troops from leaving Egypt, to 
make them stay there, and also to ensure the protection of Israel. Therefore, we
have examples in history showing that the strategy of tension and the false 
flags have been used by the US, Great Britain and Israel. Given that throughout 
their history other countries have also used the same strategy, the research 
must continue in these fields.

Silvia Cattori: These clandestine structures of NATO, created after the Second 
World War, to supply the European countries with a guerrilla capable of 
resisting the Soviet invasion, ended up serving nothing but to build criminal 
operations against the European Citizens? Everything leads to the thought that 
the United States have another purpose!

Daniele Ganser: You are right in raising this question. The United States were 
interested in the political control. This political control is an essential 
element of Washington and Londonâ¤s strategy. General Geraldo Serravalle, at 
the head of Gladio, the Italian network Stay-behind, gives an example of this in
his book. He tells us that he understood that the United States were not 
interested in the preparation of the guerrillas against an eventual Soviet 
invasion, when he saw that, what interested the CIA agents who went to the 
training exercises of the secret army that he was leading, was to make sure that
the army worked, could control the communist militants. Their fear was that the 
communists took the power in countries such a Greece, Italy and France. 
Therefore, the strategy of tension was meant to serve that purpose: to orient 
and influence the politics of certain countries of Western Europe.

Silvia Cattori: You have talked about an important emotional factor in the 
strategy of tension. Therefore, the terror, whose origin is vague, uncertain, 
the fear that it causes, all that helps to manipulate the public opinion. Are we
not assisting today to the same kind of procedure? Yesterday, we fuelled the 
fear of communism, today arenâ¤t we fuelling the fear of Islam?

Daniele Ganser: Yes, there is a very clear parallel. During the planning of the 
war in Iraq, it was said that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons in his 
possession, that there was a link between Iraq and the Al-Qaeda terrorists. But 
none of that turned out to be true. By means of these lies, it was intended to 
make people believe that Muslims wanted to spread terrorism all around, and that
this war was necessary to fight against terror. However, the true reason for 
this war is the control of energy resources. This is due to the fact that the 
geology, the richness in gas and oil, are concentrated in the Muslim countries. 
He who wants to monopolize them, must hide behind this type of manipulations.

We cannot say that there is not a lot of oil left because the global production 
- the â¤peak oilâ¤Â [12] - is going to arrive probably before 2020, and that 
therefore oil must be taken from Iraq, because people would say that children 
must not be killed to obtain oil. And they are right. They canâ¤t be told, 
either, that in the Caspian Sea there are huge reserves and that there is a plan
to create a pipeline that would go to the Indian Ocean but, given that itâ¤s is
not allowed to go through the South of Iran or the North of Russia, it must pass
through the East, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan, and therefore, this country must
be under control. That is why Muslims are labelled as "terrorists". It is all a 
big lie, but if it is repeated a thousand times that Muslims are "terrorists", 
people will end up believing it and thinking that the wars against Muslims are 
useful; and to forget that there are several types of terrorism, that violence 
is not necessarily a feature of Islam.

Silvia Cattori: So, these clandestine structures might have well been dissolved,
but the strategy of tension continues?

Daniele Ganser: Exactly. The structures might have been dissolved, and other 
ones could have been formed. It is important to explain how, in the strategy of 
tension, the tactic and manipulation work. None of that is legal. But, for the 
governments, it is easier to manipulate people than to tell them that they are 
trying to get hold of somebody elseâ¤s oil. Nevertheless, not all these attacks
arise from the strategy of tension. But it is difficult to know which ones are 
the manipulated attacks. Even those who know the amount of attacks that have 
been manipulated by the governments to discredit a political enemy, can be 
confronted by a psychological obstacle. After every bombing, people are afraid, 
they feel confused. It is very difficult to accept the idea that the strategy of
tension, the strategy of false flag, is a reality. It is easier to accept the 
manipulation and to say: "I have kept informed for 30 years, and I have never 
heard about these criminal armies. The Muslims are attacking us; this is why we 
fight against them."

Silvia Cattori: Since 2001, the European Union has created anti-terrorist 
measures. Later, is has been seen that these measures have allowed the CIA to 
kidnap people, to move them to secrete places and torture them. Have the 
European States become a sort of hostages to their submission to the United 

Daniele Ganser: The European countries have had quite a weak attitude concerning
the United States after the attacks on September 11th, 2001. After having 
confirmed that the secret prisons were illegal, they let them continue. The same
happened with the prisoners in Guantanamo. Many voices stood up in Europe to 
say: "The prisoners cannot be deprived of a lawyer or defence." When Mrs. Angela
Merkel mentioned this question, the United States clearly suggested that Germany
was a little bit involved in Iraq, that its secret services had contributed to 
prepare this war, and therefore they must shut up.

Silvia Cattori: Within this context, where there are still many unclear areas, 
what type of security can NATO give to the peoples it is supposed to protect if 
it allows the secret services to manipulate in this way?

Daniele Ganser:Concerning the terrorist attacks carried out by the secret armies
of the network Gladio during the Cold War, it is important that we are able to 
determine clearly which is the real implication of NATO in this, to know what 
really happened. Is this about isolated acts secretly organised by NATO? Until 
this day, NATO refuses to talk about the strategy of tension and terrorism 
during the Cold War. NATO refuses all questions related to Gladio.

Today, NATO is used as an offensive army, even though this organization was not 
created to play that role. It was activated in that sense on September 12th 
2001, immediately after the attacks in New York. NATOâ¤s leaders affirm that 
the reason for their involvement in the war against the Afghans is to fight 
against terrorism. However, NATO is in danger of losing that war. Therefore, 
when that happens they will be a big crisis, a debate. And this will allow us to
know whether NATO is really fighting a war against terrorism, or if it is trying
to create an analogous situation to that of the Cold War with the secret army 
Gladio, where she had a link to terror. The next few years will tell us if NATO 
has acted outside the mission that was accorded to it: to defend the European 
countries and the Unites States in case of Soviet invasion, an event that has 
never occurred. NATO was not funded to take over the oil and gas of the Muslim 

Silvia Cattori: We could understand that Israel, who is interested in widening 
the conflicts in the Arabic and Muslim countries, encourages the United States 
in that direction. But, we cannot see what it is that interests the European 
countries and that makes them engage their troops in the wars decided by the 
Pentagon, as was the case in Afghanistan.

Daniele Ganser: I think that Europe is confused. The United States are in a 
strong position, and the Europeans have a tendency to think that the best thing 
is to collaborate with the strongest one. But we would have to think about this 
more thoroughly. The European politicians give in easily to the pressure put by 
the US, who is always asking for more troops in this or that front. The more the
European countries give in, the more they subordinate, and the more they will 
find themselves confronted to bigger and bigger problems. In Afghanistan the 
Germans and the British are under the command of the American army. 
Strategically, it is not an interesting position for these countries. Now, the 
US has asked the Germans to engage their soldiers in the South of Afghanistan as
well, in the areas were the battle is the hardest. If the Germans accept, they 
take the risk of being massacred by the Afghan forces which refuse the presence 
of any king of occupier. _ Germany should ask itself seriously whether she 
should not rather withdraw their 3000 soldiers from Afghanistan. But, for the 
Germans, to disobey the US⤠orders, to which they are a bit like lieges, it is
a very hard step to make.

Silvia Cattori: How much do our current government know today about the strategy
of tension ? Can they just let the war-doers foment coups dâ¤Ã©tat, kidnap and 
torture people without reacting? Have they any means to stop these criminal 

Daniele Ganser: I do not know. As an historian, I observe and take notes. As a 
political adviser, I always say that one must never give in to the manipulations
that try to induce fear and to make people believe that the "terrorists" are 
always the Muslims; I say that this is about a struggle for controlling the 
energy resources; that some means of surviving the lack of energy must be found 
without needing to go to a militarization. Problems cannot be solved in this 
way; they only become worse.

Silvia Cattori: When we observe the demonisation of the Arabs and Muslims in the
conflict between Israel and Palestine, we might think that this does not have 
anything to do with the oil.

Daniele Ganser: No. In this case not. But, in the US perspective, it is 
definitely about taking control of the energy reserves of the Eurasian block 
that is situated in a â¤strategic ellipse⤠that goes from Azerbaijan to Saudi
Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait and the Persian Gulf, passing through Turkmenistan and 
Kazakhstan. It is precisely over there, in that region where this false war 
â¤against terrorism⤠is taking place, that the biggest oil and gas reserves 
are concentrated. In my opinion, it is not about anything else but a 
geo-strategic game inside which the European Union can do nothing but lose. 
Because, if the US takes hold of the resources, and the energy crisis becomes 
worse, it will tell them: "You want gas, you want oil. Very well, in exchange we
want this and that." The US is not going to give the oil and gas for free to the
European countries. A few people know that the "peak oil", the maximum 
production of oil in Europe - the production to Norway and Great Britain - is 

The day when people will realise that these wars â¤against terrorism⤠are 
manipulated, and that the accusations against the Muslims are, among other 
things, propaganda, they are going to be surprised. The European countries must 
wake up and understand once and for all how the strategy of tension works. And 
they must also learn to say "no" to the US. Moreover, in the US also, there are 
many people who do not want this militarizing of the international 

Silvia Cattori: You have also done some research on the attacks that took place 
in September 11th 2001 and you have signed a book [13] jointly with other 
intellectuals who worry about the inconsistencies and contradictions of the 
official version of these events, as well as the conclusions of the commission 
of survey ordered by Mr. Bush. Do you not fear being accused of being a 
"conspiracy theorist"?

Daniele Ganser: My students and other people have always asked me : if this "war
against terrorism" concerns indeed the oil and gas, the 911 attacks have also 
been manipulated, havenâ¤t they? Or is it a coincidence that Osama Ben 
Ladenâ¤s Muslims have struck exactly at the precise moment that the occidental 
countries were starting to understand that an oil crisis was announcing itself?

Therefore, I became interested in what had been written about September 11th and
I also studied the official report that was presented in 2004. When we dig into 
this subject, we realize from the start that there is a big worldwide debate 
around what really happened on 911. The information that we have is not very 
precise. What makes one question this 600 page report is that the third tower 
that collapsed on that day is not even mentioned. The commission only talks 
about the collapsing of two towers, the Twin Towers. But there is a third 170 
meters high tower that collapsed too; the WTC 7 tower. A small fire is mentioned
concerning it. I have talked to professors who know very well the building 
structures; they say that a small fire cannot destroy such a big structure. The 
official story of 911 and the commissionâ¤s conclusions, are not reliable. This
lack of clarity puts the researchers in a difficult situation. The confusion 
predominated as well about what really happened at the Pentagon. In the pictures
that we have, it is very difficult to see a plane. We cannot see how a plane 
would have fallen there.

Silvia Cattori: The Venezuelan Government has asked the US for further 
explanations to clarify the origin of the attacks. Would this not be the example
to follow?

Daniele Ganser: There are many uncertainties about September 11th. Politicians, 
members of the academia and citizens can all claim to explain what really 
happened. I think that it is important to continue asking questions. It is an 
event that no one can forget; everybody remembers where he/she was at that 
precise moment. It is unbelievable that five years later, we still cannot see 
clearly what happened.

Silvia Cattori: It is almost as if none of the structures created wanted to 
doubt the official version. Is it possible that they let themselves be 
manipulated by the lack of information organized by the ones who organize the 
strategy of the tension and the False flags?

Daniele Ganser: We are prone to manipulation if we are afraid. Afraid of losing 
the respect from the people that we love. We cannot go out of this spiral of 
violence and terror if we let the fear take over. It is normal to be afraid, but
we must overtly talk about this fear and about the manipulations that generate 
it. Nobody can escape their consequences. This is even more serious when the 
politicians in charge react often under the effect of fear. One must find the 
strength to say: "Yes, I am afraid to know that these lies make people suffer; 
yes, I am afraid to think that there is less oil left; yes, I am afraid to think
that this terrorism they talk about is the consequence of manipulations, but I 
will not let myself become intimidated."

Silvia Cattori: Up to what extent do countries like Switzerland participate, 
right now, in this strategy of tension?

Daniele Ganser: I do not think there is any strategy of tension in Switzerland. 
This country does not know any terrorist attacks. But, it is true that, in 
Switzerland as everywhere else, the politicians are afraid of the US and its 
strong position, and they have a tendency to say to themselves: "They are good 
friends, weâ¤d better not fight against them."

Silvia Cattori: Doesnâ¤t this way of thinking and of covering up the lies that 
arise from the strategy of tension make everyone an accomplice of the crimes 
that it causes? To start with the journalists and the political parties?

Daniele Ganser: I personally think that everyone - journalists, professors, 
politicians - must think about the implications of the strategy if tension and 
the false flag. Here we are, indeed, in presence of phenomena that escape from 
every kind of agreement. That is why, every time that there are terrorist 
attacks, we must ask questions and try to understand what that implies. It is 
only on the day that we officially admit that the false flags are a reality, 
that it will be possible for us to create a list of the false flags that took 
place in history and to agree upon what should be done.

The subject that interests me is how to achieve peace. It is important to open a
debate on the strategy of tension and to take cognizance of the fact that this 
is a very real phenomenon. Since as long as we do not recognize its existence, 
we cannot act. That is why it is important to explain what the strategy of 
tension truly means. And, once we have understood, we must not let fear and 
hatred against one group win. We must say to ourselves that it is not only one 
country that is involved in this; that it is not only the United States, Italy, 
Israel or the Iranians, but that it occurs everywhere. Even if certain countries
participate in a more intensive way than others. We must understand, without 
blaming one country or one person. Fear and hatred do not help us to advance, 
they paralyse the debate. I see many accusations against the Unites States, 
against Israel and against great Britain, or alternatively against Iran and 
Syria. But the search for peace teaches us that one must not get lost in 
accusations based on nationalism, and that neither hatred nor fear are needed; 
that the most important thing is to explain the reality. And this comprehension 
will be beneficial for everybody.

Silvia Cattori: Why is your book about NATOâ¤s secret armies published in 
English, translated into English, Turk, Slovenian and soon Greek, but it is not 
published in French?

Daniele Ganser: I havenâ¤t found any publisher in France, yet. If any publisher
happens to be interested in publishing my book, I will be very pleased to see it
being issued in French.

Silvia Cattori
Swiss journalist.
This author's articles

[1] Natoâ¤s secret Armies: Terrorism in Western Europe par Daniele Ganser, 
preface by John Prados. Frank Cass ed., 2005. ISBN 07146850032005

[2] It is after the attack in Piazza Fontana in Milano in 1969 that the term 
strategy of tension was heard for the first time.

[3] False flag operations is the expression used to talk about terrorist acts, 
conducted secretly by governments or organizations, and which are made to be 
seen as having been conducted by somebody else.

[4] « Stay-behind : les réseaux dâ¤ingérence américains » (« the American
interfering networks ») par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, August 20th, 

[5] Stay behind is the name given to the clandestine structures trained to 
conduct a partisans⤠war.

[6] Gladio designates the group of European secret armies that were under the 
guidance of the CIA.

[7] President of the Council of Ministers, member of the Christian Democracy.

[8] « Rapport Andreotti sur lâ¤Opération Gladio » ("Andreotti Report about 
the Gladio Operation") February 26th, 1991, Réseau Voltaireâ¤s library.

[9] « 1980: Massacre in Bologna, 85 dead », Réseau Voltaire, July 6th, 2005.

[10] « La France autorise lâ¤action des services US sur son territoire » 
(France authorises the US services to act on its territory ») by Thierry 
Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 8 mars 2004.

[11] LavonAffair, from the name of the Israeli minister of Defense who had to 
quit his work when Mossad was found to have been involved in these criminal 

[12] See : « Odeurs de pétrole à la Maison-Blanche » (Smell of oil in the 
White House), Réseau Voltaire, Dec. 14 , 2001. « Les ombres du rapport Cheney 
» (the shadows of the Cheney rapport) by Arthur Lepic, March 30, 2004. « The 
Power of Oil in the XXI Century » by Arthur Lepic, May 10th, 2004. « Dick 
Cheney, le pic pétrolier et le compte à rebours final » (Dick Cheney, the iol
peak and the final downcount") by Kjell Aleklett, March 9, 2005.« Adapting the 
economy to the lack of oil » by Thierry Meyssan, June 9th, 2005.

[13] 9/11 American Empire : Intellectual speaks out, under the direction of 
David Ray Griffin, Olive Branch Press, 2006


Posting archives: http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
Escaping the Matrix website: http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website: http://cyberjournal.org

Community Democracy Framework: 

Subscribe cyberjournal list: •••@••.•••  (send blank

cyberjournal blog (join in): http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)