False flag : 9/11 : witnesses refer to demolition


Richard Moore


More Proof 911 Inside
Job - Witnesses To
WTC Explosives

During the afternoon of 9/11, the Mayor of New York city
and the Governor of New York state held a press

Reporters asked 2 interesting questions:

"Is there anything to indicate that there could be MORE
BOMBS, more planes out there?"

"So, the only National Guard we'll see will be in lower
Manhattan, in the BOMB site area?"

Neither the Mayor nor the Governor corrected the reporters
by stating that there weren't any bombs, and that --
instead -- the twin towers had collapsed due solely to
airplane and fire damage.

If you were a high-level official trying to calm down the
public in a major crisis (which is part of the job
description) and there weren't in fact bombs in t he world
trade centers, wouldn't you have corrected the reporters
in order to kill unfounded rumors and minimize panic?
Doesn't this lack of a statement amount to an
acknowledgment that the Mayor and Governor believed there
were bombs in the twin towers?

By way of analogy, imagine that 10 witnesses say they saw
Mike shoot Joe. In a press conference, a reporter asks the
police chief if police know why Mike shot Joe, and the
chief answers without correcting the reporter. In other
words, the police chief does not answer by saying
something like "No no, Fred shot Joe" or

"we don't know who shot Joe yet, we've just started
investigating". Isn't that further circumstantial evidence
that tends to show that Mike shot Joe? Doesn't the silence
in the face of bomb-related questions help corroborate the
numerous eyewitness statements of bombs in the trade
centers, such as the following:

A reporter for USA Today stated that the FBI believed that
bombs i n the buildings brought the buildings down;

The NY Fire Department Chief of Safety stated there were
"bombs" and "secondary devices", which caused the
explosions in the buildings;

A NYC firefighters who witnessed attacks stated that it
looked like there were bombs in the buildings;

A NYC firefighter stated "On the last trip up a bomb went
off. We think there was bombs set in the building";

An MSNBC reporter stated that police had found a
suspicious device "and they fear it could be something
that might lead to another explosion" and the police
officials believe "that one of the explosions at the world
trade center . . . may have been caused by a van that was
parked in the building that may have had some kind of
explosive device in it, so their fear is that there may
have been explosive devices planted either in the building
or in the adjacent area";

A NYC firefighter stated "the south tower . . . exploded .
. . At that point a debate began to rag e because the
perception was that the building looked like it had been
taken out with charges . . . many people had felt that
possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade";

Assistant Fire Commissioner stated "I thought . . . before
. . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . .
I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level
of the building [not up where the fire was]. You know like
when they . . . blow up a building ... ?" -- and a
lieutenant firefighter the Commisioner spoke with
independently verified the flashes;

A firefighter said "[T]here was just an explosion. It
seemed like on television [when] they blow up these
buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around
like a belt, all these explosions"; Another firefigther
stated "it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom,
boom, boom, like seven or eight";

A paramedic said "at first I thought it was -- do you ever
see professional demolition where they se t the charges on
certain floors and then you hear pop pop pop pop pop --
thats exactly what because thought it was";

A police officer noted "People were saying, 'There's
another one and another one.' I heard reports of secondary
bomb explosions ...";

A firefighter stated "there was an explosion in the south
tower, which . . . just blew out in flames . . . One floor
under another after another and when it hit about the
fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb, because it looked
like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing. I was there
in '93" (referring to 1993 bombing of world trade center;

A firefighter stated "it looked like sparkling around one
specific layer of the building . . . Then the building
started to come down. My initial reaction was that this
was exactly the way it looks when they show you those
implosions on TV";

Dan Rather said that collapse was "reminiscent of those
pictures we've all seen [when] a building was deliberately
destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down" (CNN's
Aaron Brown and a Fox News reporter also made similar

A British newspaper stated "some eyewitnesses reported
hearing another explosion just before the structure
crumbled. Police said that it looked almost like a
'planned implosion'";

One ABC reporter stated it looked like a controlled
demolition; another ABC reporter stated "anyone who has
ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows
that if you're going to do this you have to get at the
under-infrastructure of the building to bring it down";

A reporter for WNYC radio said "The reporters were trying
to figure out what had happened. We were thinking bombs
had brought the buildings down";

A Wall Street Journal reporter said "I heard this metallic
roar, looked up and saw what I thought was just a peculiar
site of individual floors, one after the other exploding
outward. I thought to myself, "My God, they're going to
bring the build ing down." And they, whoever they are, HAD
SET CHARGES . . . . I saw the explosions"; and

A facilities manager in the north tower "was convinced
that there were bombs planted all over the place and
someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator
buttons". You can view links to the source materials for
all eyewitness quotes at www.911Proof.com .

The 9/11 Commission Report did not even once mention the
word "explosion" or "bomb". The mainstream media hasn't
touched the evidence of bombs in the trade center.
Democratic and republican politicans smear anyone who even
raises the issue as a conspiracy nut. Isn't it time that
we faced the elephant in the living room? Can our
democracy survive if we don't?



"Apocalypse Now and the Brave New World"

Posting archives:

Subscribe to low-traffic list:
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.