Europe blames US for WTO failure


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Europe blames US for WTO failure

EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson has blamed the US for the collapse of the 
latest round of global trade talks.

US conditions attached to cutting farming subsidies were "unacceptable" for 
developing countries, he said.

But the US said it was "fully committed" to the talks and blamed Europe for its 
lack of ambition over reaching a deal to cut farming tariffs.

After assessing the situation, the World Trade Organization (WTO) decided no 
more talks should be attempted.

"We will certainly not conclude the round this year," WTO director general 
Pascal Lamy said.

That could mean even further delays to the so-called Doha round of talks which 
began in 2004.

'Missed opportunity'

Negotiators had been hoping for a deal this year before the special authority US
President George W Bush has to negotiate trade deals expires, making it harder 
for him to win congressional approval for a treaty.

Mr Lamy warned that the richer members of the WTO must now keep the negotiation 
process going, saying: "We have missed a very important opportunity to prove 
that multilateralism works."

EU Commissioner Mandelson said he was "profoundly disappointed" that talks had 
stumbled, mainly as a result of America's inflexibility.

"What they're saying is that for every dollar that they strip out of their 
trade-distorting farm subsidies they want to be given a dollar's worth of market
access in developing country markets," he said.

"That is not acceptable to developing countries and it's a principle that I on 
Europe's behalf certainly couldn't sign up to either."

US trade representative Susan Schwab insisted the US remained "fully committed 
to multilateral trading system".

But she said that "a number of developed and advanced developing countries were 
looking for ways to be less ambitious, to avoid making ambitious contributions".

Meanwhile, Senator Charles Grassley, chairman of the Senate finance committee 
that would have to approve any trade deal, backed the stance of the US trade 

"I've always said that no deal is better than a bad deal, and a 'Doha light' 
deal would be a bad deal," he said.

"I'm glad our trade negotiators held their ground."
'Terrible blow'

The EU, US, Brazil, Australia, India and Japan have been negotiating a deal to 
boost world trade in industrial and agricultural goods.

The deal on the table would have caused great damage to developing countries

John Hilary
War on Want

Charity Christian Aid said that the collapse of talks struck "a terrible blow" 
for the world's poor.

It had removed the most important weapon in the fight against global poverty, 
the charity's senior trade analyst Dr Claire Melamed said.

But John Hilary, director of campaigns and policy at War on Want, said the 
collapse was good for the world's poor.

"Any chance of a genuinely pro-poor outcome was lost long ago, and the deal on 
the table would have caused great damage to developing countries," he said.

Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2006/07/24 18:09:53 GMT


Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy