Elite Depopulation Agenda Gains Ground


Richard Moore

"The Medical Journal of Australia has published a report by a
professor who suggests that couples with more than two
children should be charged a lifelong tax to offset their
extra offspring's carbon dioxide emissions."


It is the unspoken logic of this article that is most interesting. They are 
assuming, tacitly, that there is no hope of moving toward sustainable 
infrastructures, and that there's no sense in even talking about that. Instead, 
we should take our extremely wasteful economic system as a given, and blame 'the
problem' on the existence of people.


Original source URL:

Elite Depopulation Agenda Gains Ground

Top Australian Science Journal calls for de-facto one child policy to "offset 
carbon emissions"

Steve Watson
Monday, Dec 10, 2007

Another prominent scientist has thrown his weight behind the long term agenda to
implement measures to stem the population of the planet, a view that is gaining 
ground with increased pressure on governments to act over climate change as the 

The Medical Journal of Australia has published a report by a professor who 
suggests that couples with more than two children should be charged a lifelong 
tax to offset their extra offspring's carbon dioxide emissions.

The report in an Australian medical journal called for parents to be charged 
$5000 a head for every child after their second, and an annual tax of up to 
$800, reports the AAP.

And couples who were sterilised would be eligible for carbon credits under the 
controversial proposal.

The report, written by Perth specialist Professor Barry Walters, also suggests 
that the government should introduce a "baby levy" in the form of a carbon tax 
in line with the "polluter pays" principle.

The proposals smack of Communist China's one child policy and present a 
nightmare scenario of authoritarian governmental control. Under such legislation
the government would essentially have the power to force people to stop 

You may think such views are extreme and representative of a small minority, and
you'd be right. The problem however is that this minority are the ones in power.

Similar views have been espoused by UN agencies such as the United Nations 
Population Fund (UNFPA), WHO and UNICEF and international NGO's such as the 
International Planned Parenthood Federation, as well as The US Government for 

We have previously documented the elite's hideous interest in depopulation 
techniques, an interest that mirrors the nightmare eugenics visions of Nazi 
scientists in the 1940s.

Calls to begin sterilizing the human population have previously been put forward
by former secretary of State and high ranking Bilderberger Henry Kissinger in a 
declassified document of the National Security Council (1974) entitled "The 
Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External 
Interests of the United States".

This document lists, as a priority, birth-rate control in 13 key countries in 
the Third World, especially in South America. Extraordinary resources were 
allotted to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to implement 
the policy of birth-rate control.

The memorandum basically stresses the need to offer increased aid for third 
world countries that agree to implement programs of sterilization and 

It also contains sections entitled:

Creating Conditions Conducive to Fertility Decline, which calls for, amongst 
other things, "reducing infant and child mortality"

Concentration on Education and Indoctrination of The Rising Generation of 
Children Regarding the Desirability of Smaller Family Size

Utilization of Mass Media and Satellite Communications Systems for Family 

The memorandum also includes a section that lauds abortion and states that " -- 
It would be unwise to restrict abortion research for the following reasons: 1) 
The persistent and ubiquitous nature of abortion. 2) Widespread lack of safe 
abortion techniques..."

The document contains many more hideous passages, read it for yourself by 
clicking here.

Kissinger also prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter 
called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the 
third world.

The United Nations Population Fund directly supports policies such as that of 
the "one child policy" in Communist China which encapsulates coercive and 
enforced abortion.

In 2002 Secretary of State Colin Powell stated in a letter to Congress:

"Regrettably, the People's Republic of China has in place a regime of severe 
penalties on women who have unapproved births. This regime plainly operates to 
coerce pregnant women to have abortions in order to avoid the penalties and 
therefore amounts to a Œprogram of coercive abortion.¹ Regardless of the modest 
size of UNFPA¹s budget in China or any benefits its programs provide, UNFPA's 
support of, and involvement in, China's population-planning activities allows 
the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive 

Yet The UNPFA seem to think this is a great thing:

"China has had the most successful family planning policy in the history of 
mankind in terms of quantity and with that, China has done mankind a favour," 
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) representative Sven Burmester said last 
week. ‹10/11/99 Agence France-Presse

Under the Reagan Administration legislation sponsored by then-Rep. Jack Kemp 
(NY) and then-Sen. Bob Kasten (WI) ensured funding to the UNPFA was cut off for 
these very reasons. Yet is was no surprise when In 1993, the Clinton 
Administration dramatically revised the official interpretation of the 
³Kemp-Kasten amendment² in order to facilitate U.S. funding of UNFPA, thus 
making available $14.5 million.

In May 2003, the House Committee on International Relations narrowly adopted an 
an amendment by Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-NY) revoking the ban on such 
participation with the UNPFA. The amendment earmarked $100 million for UNFPA 
over the next two years.

Such calls to depopulate are echoed within the western scientific community by 
prominent figures such as Dr. Eric R. Pianka, who travels around the US speaking
of the need to exterminate 90% of the population in order to save the planet. He
suggests using the airborne ebola virus to do the job, choosing it over AIDS 
because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths
imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body 
literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.

Pianka is always keen to stress that his views are not race specific and that he
wants to see 90% of all races exterminated. He is quoted as saying "We need to 
sterilize everybody on the earth and make the antidote freely available to 
anyone willing to work for it".

Pianka was presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Texas Academy 
of Science in 2006. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious 
universities worldwide. His chilling comments, and their often enthusiastic 
reception, again underscore the elite's agenda to enact horrifying measures of 
population control.

Dr Pianka's comments are merely echoes of the elite lust for a Malthusian social
Darwinist control mechanism. They wish to use the excuse of having to "save the 
earth" in order to take away freedom and implement a massive authoritarian 
control grid.

These views have also been famously perpetuated by control freaks such as Ted 
Turner, Jacques-Yves Cousteau and Prince Philip.

"The simplest answer is that the world's population should be about two billion,
and we've got about six billion now," Turner told E Magazine, an 
environmentalist publication. Turner went even further in an interview with 
Audubon magazine, stating that "A total world population of 250-300 million 
people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

In a 1991 interview with the UNESCO Courier, Jacques-Yves Cousteau, the famous 
Emmy award winning film producer who went on to be a kingpin of the 
environmental movement said, "It's terrible to have to say this. World 
population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people 
per day."

That works out to 127,750,000 people per year, and 1.27 billion people over 10 

In the foreword to his 1986 book If I Were an Animal, Prince Philip wrote, "In 
the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in 
order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."

The elite are very concerned about their noble effort to cull the population for
the "greater good". Throughout history elites have invented justification for 
barbaric practices as a cover for their true agenda of absolute power and 
control over populations. Up until the 19th century, the transatlantic slave 
trade was justified by saying that the practice was biblical and therefore 
morally redeemable in nature, despite the fact that no such bible passage 

Today the control mechanism is the continued perpetuation of the myth that 
humanity is killing the planet. Elite organisations such as the Bilderberg 
Group, CFR, Trilateral Commission, and their think tanks like the Club of Rome 
are engaged in selling this myth to the masses.

In a report titled The First Global Revolution (1991) published by the Club of 
Rome, a globalist think tank whose members have included Kissinger, David 
Rockefeller and Al Gore, we find the following statement:

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that 
pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like 
would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The
real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

In the past, the Club of Rome has resorted to deceptive tactics in order to 
support their plans. In 1972, the Club of Rome, along with an MIT team released 
a report called Limits to growth. The report stated that we were to reach an 
environmental holocaust by the year 2000 due to overpopulation and other 
environmental problems. Support for their conclusions was gathered by results 
from a computer model. Aurelio Peccei, one of the founders of the Club of Rome, 
later confessed that the computer program had been written to give the desired 

Why is this so concerning? Because groups such as the Club of Rome are 
contracted out by our own governments and the UN to prepare ŒPolicy Guidance 
Documents¹ which they use in formulating their policies and programs. How come 
the Club of Rome gets the gig? Simply because many high ranking UN and 
government officials are also CoR members, or have direct corporate ties to 
members. The same goes for the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.

A recently unearthed documentary that sought to expose this agenda at its 
inception is George Hunt's excellent research piece on the environmental 

Alex Jones' latest documentary, Endgame breaks new ground by succinctly tying 
the hijacking of the environmental movement with the depopulation agenda. The 
film outlines how the scientific rationale for tyranny gives the elite an excuse
for treating their fellow man like lab rats and how this mindset gave rise to 
the emergence of eugenics in the 19th century. Endgame catalogues how the 
Malthusian drive to eliminate the poor developed into social Darwinism which 
then transgressed into the fields of racial hygiene programs and genetic 
screening as American citizens were forcibly sterilized by the state throughout 
the 19th century.

Endgame also charts how the Rockefeller family exported eugenics to Germany by 
bankrolling the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which later would form a central pillar
in the Third Reich's ideology of the Nazi super race. After the fall of the 
Nazis, top eugenicists were protected by the allies as the victorious parties 
fought over who would enjoy their "expertise" in the post-war world.

The comments of elitists alive today who openly advocate "culling" the human 
population by means of mass genocide, plagues and viruses are also considered 
alongside Aldous Huxley's warning that ruling oligarchies would use advanced 
techniques of medicine and pharmacology to ensure the human population "enjoy 
their servitude".

Endgame rips wide open how the myth of man-made global warming is being hyped by
the establishment in order to create new feudalist control methods and convince 
people that their every action should be regulated by the state in the interests
of supposedly saving the planet, while the real environmental crises go ignored.

The doomsday warning of the population bomb consistently referred to as 
justification for depopulation is also complete pseudo-science. Populations in 
developed countries are declining and only in third world countries is it 
expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends 
and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's 
population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. 
"The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged 
at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report. The UN population 
policies seem to be in direct contradiction to THEIR OWN FINDINGS.

Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface 
was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is 
commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state 
of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.

Once a country industrializes there is an average of a 1.6 child rate per 
household, so the western world population is actually in decline. That trend 
has also been witnessed in areas of Asia like Japan and South Korea. The UN has 
stated that the population will peak at 9 billion and then begin declining.

Even if you buy into the propaganda that climate change is caused by man in the 
face of the facts, and then buy into the propaganda that there are too many 
people on the planet in the face of the facts, can you justify advocating state 
micro management of your life down to how many children you are allowed to have?
Furthermore, can you justify programs of sterilization?

We are being bombarded daily with idiotic notions that the human race and life 
itself is a virus that has spread all over the planet and that we must consider 
stemming our own progression to counter it.

Meanwhile, as we ludicrously debate culling ourselves, real environmental 
problems are doing the job for us. Genetically modified garbage is poisoning our
very food supply, chemical pollutants are flowing into our water supplies, the 
disappearance of huge swathes of the bee populations across the world is 
threatening crop production, deforestation, toxic waste dumping, the list goes 
on. All these real important issues are being buried in a sea a frothing 

Every time the issue of climate change is raised the we are told that the 
solution is more taxes and more extreme control over our lives. These things 
will not reverse the effects of climate change, which has been proven to be a 
thoroughly natural cycle of our planet since the dawn of time. Instead they will
do everything to grease the skids for draconian taxation and control measures 
that will aid the construction of the prison planet that the elite have planned 
all along.

Copyright © Infowars.net All rights reserved.


View more High quality trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com


Posting archives: 

Escaping the Matrix website: http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website: http://cyberjournal.org

How We the People can change the world:

Community Democracy Framework: 

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)