Daniel Ellsberg on 911

2006-07-20

Richard Moore

Original source URL:

    "If there¹s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East
    involving a U.S. attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there
    will be, the day after or within days an equivalent of a
    Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions
    in this country."
    - Daniel Ellsberg, Author, Pentagon Papers

http://infowars.com/articles/terror/pentagon_papers_author_gov_maybe_did_911.htm

Pentagon Papers Author Daniel Ellsberg Says Government May Have Carried Out 9/11

Predicts Bush Regime Will Stage Terrorist Attack To Provide Pretext For Iran, 
Syria Invasion, And Justify Internment Camps For American People

Infowars | July 19, 2006
By Kevin Smith & Alex Jones

Daniel Ellsberg is a former American military analyst employed by the RAND 
Corporation who precipitated a national firestorm in 1971 when he released the 
Pentagon Papers, the US military's account of activities during the Vietnam War,
to The New York Times. The release awakened the American people to a systematic 
program of organized deception carried out by the Pentagon against the 
population to continue the Vietnam War.

Daniel Ellsberg, speaking on air to GCN radio host Jack Blood, stated his 
concerns that criminal elements of the US government were psychologically 
capable to have carried out 9/11. He warned that within days after a US military
strike on Iran that Bush's handlers would probably stage some type of terror 
attack in the West to legitimize the new war.

Ellsberg went on to state that another major Reichstag-like state-sponsored 
attack would be followed by a martial law scenario which might include detention
camps for American dissenters.

Ellsberg said that he worked with individuals at the highest levels of 
government who staged war provocations several times to whip up pro-war 
sentiment in the US. Daniel Ellsberg now joins the ranks of hundreds of 
prominent engineers, physicists, economists, military officers, pilots, 
high-level intelligence analysts, and cabinet ministers who are exposing the 
9/11 hoax.

Each day more and more respected professionals are going public with their 
questions about the official 9/11 fable. The 9/11 cover-up dam is breaking under
the weight of these truthseekers' efforts and the perpetrators of 9/11 are 
watching them in horror while wondering who will be the next to speak up.

Here is a partial transcript of the interview:

Jack Blood: Have you had a chance to take a look at a lot of this information 
coming from America¹s leading scholars, physicists, engineers, etc. Who have 
taken a look now at 9/11 and are now, not only questioning what might have 
happened on 9/11, but really being very direct including a number of high level 
Š

Daniel Ellsberg: Actually, I have looked at a lot of that, and I¹ll tell you 
without going into it all which would take a lot of time, I find some of it very
implausible and other parts of it quite solid, and there¹s no question in my 
mind that there¹s enough evidence there to justify a very comprehensive and hard
hitting investigation of a kind that we¹ve not seen, with subpoenas, general 
questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents, there¹s no
question that (D.E. chuckles) put it this way, very serious questions have been 
raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may 
been. Is the, is a administration capable, humanly and physiologically of 
engineering such a provocation?

Yes, I would say that, I worked for such an administration myself, Johnson, ah, 
President Johnson put destroyers in harm¹s way in the Tonkin Gulf not only once,
but several times, with the, with a lot of his people hoping that it would lead 
to a confrontation and claiming that it had. And could have resulted in the lost
of many lives in the course of it. And what I¹m saying now, by the way though is
this, and here there¹s a very strong analogy, to this day there is a controversy
gone back and forth historically, as to who caused the Reichstag fire, the 
burning of their parliament, the Reichstag, on February 27 th 1933. Goering, at 
one point, the number two man in the Nazi regime, said ³I set that fire², later 
he denied that at Nuremberg, and I¹ve noticed that the latest history suggests, 
that it wasn¹t the Nazi¹s. The point is that all this time later is there is 
still a controversy about that. But, what there¹s no controversy about is the 
use the Nazi¹s made of it, that very night and the next day.

J.B. Cui Bono, who benefits

D.E. February 28 th, there was a Reichstag fire decree that ended freedom of 
speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, all in the Weimar 
Constitution, and privacy of the postal system and of communications and of 
telephone, what ended here to, more than we knew four years ago right after 
9/11. If there¹s another 9/11 or a major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S.
attack on Iran, I have no doubt that there will be, the day after or within days
an equivalent of a Reichstag fire decree that will involve massive detentions in
this country, detention camps for middle-easterners and their quote 
³sympathizers², critics of the President¹s policy and essentially the wiping-out
of the Bill of Rights.

J.B. I know your walking very carefully here Daniel Ellsberg, but that¹s pretty 
strong medicine and we have to look at the history of the world, governments do 
this, as you mentioned, governments are liars, governments are murderers, they, 
this is not above them, I¹m sure your familiar with the Northwoods Document.

D.E. Ah yes, indeed. Yeah talking about a manufactured provocation which could 
have involved even the shooting down of an American or some other airliner, with
American support. Yes I would say by the way, that Americans definitely play 
this game, I¹m sure that it¹s happening now.

We, I expected by the way, Bush to manufacture a kind of Tonkin Gulf incident 
before he went into Iraq and then I decided well I¹d been wrong they didn¹t feel
they needed that. It is interesting that the memos that came out, in 
conversations between Blair and Bush, (aka The White House Memo), show that Bush
was pressing for the possibility of sending over a U-2 and getting it fired on 
and using that as an excuse.

J.B. A U-2 painted like a U.N., ah, a United Nations airplane.

D.E. Yes, but they couldn¹t do that again for sure. But, what is happening right
now is that Israel is clearly seeking a generally provocative act by both Hammas
and Hezbollah, which I think were not wise acts some people are applauding those
in the Middle-East passing out sweets and so forth, very short-sighted I would 
say, a lot of innocent people are going to die as a result.
-- 

--------------------------------------------------------
Escaping the Matrix website     http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website            http://cyberjournal.org
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives                http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
Blogs:
  cyberjournal forum            http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/
  Achieving real democracy      http://harmonization.blogspot.com/
  for readers of ETM            http://matrixreaders.blogspot.com/
  Community Empowerment http://empowermentinitiatives.blogspot.com/
  Blogger made easy             http://quaylargo.com/help/ezblogger.html