--------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:42:14 -0700
o: •••@••.•••
From: Connie Fogal <•••@••.•••>
Subject: Summary and Part 1: The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of Canada
by our Own Government: North American Union
Summary and Part one: The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of
Canada by our Own Government: North American Union
The Meta-morphosis and the Sabotage of Canada by our Own
Government:
Summary:
The North American continent is being transformed from
three sovereign nations (Canada, USA, Mexico) into one
regional corporate power base, the North American Union.
Unlike the creation of the European Union, there is no
public political/ academic discourse on the merits, or
pros and cons of a North American Union building up to a
vote within each nation as to the wish of the people to
join such a union. Instead the union is being created by
stealth, is already well on its way to fruition, and is
being imposed on us by our own elected representatives and
government with no opposition.
The driving forces are corporate and military. The Chief
Executive Officers of the most powerful corporations
operating in the three countries want this union and have
been working for some time devising their strategies and
goals. Their facilitators are first, unelected officials
and bureaucrats who move easily between corporations and
government; second, former elected officials like John
Manley , former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada; third,
the heads of the three nations, Martin, Bush, and Fox; and
finally, the governments and the rest of the elected
members who apparently just rubber stamp what is put in
front of them by the unelected officials- few questions,
if any asked.
The ultimate enforcement mechanism for the North American
Union is a police state.
The tools for the police state are "anti-terrorist" laws.
Anti Terrorist laws are a ruse to strip the citizens of
civil liberties in order to prevent dissent against the
police state.
The Orwellian justification is "security", "safety".
Part one deals with the North American Union of Canada USA
and Mexico. It is being created by the corporate side
under the North American Task Force, and the military side
by the Binational Military Planning group.
Part Two deals with -Laws Arrangements and Agreements all
of which throw away our sovereignty, independence, and
our civil liberties.
1. The Canada -U.S. Smart Border Declaration with a 30
point action plan signed Dec 12,2001
2. The Public Safety Act, 2002 with despotic powers to
certain Cabinet Ministers
3. The Anti Terrorism Act currently under review
4. The Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement
signed by Bush and Martin in March of 2005
5. 40 Point Smart Regulation Action Plan announced March
24 2005
Part Three deals with the effect of all this bad law, some
history, and what to do about it.
I am sending my article in three parts over time due to
its length. Part one is included in this e mail. I have
included many urls to take you to sources to substantiate
what I am saying. I continue to be surprised by the
number of people who still refuse to believe that the
scenario I describe is happening, and who demand to be
taken off my broadcast lists.
This article will also be available in full on the CAP/PAC
website.
Connie Fogal
The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of Canada by our Own
Government
Part 1- North American Union
* The Metamorphosis of Canada, USA and Mexico into the
North American Union
Canadian patriots have been focusing on the wrong threat-
annexation to the U.S.A with no voting rights, only colony
status like a Gibraltar. The real plan emerges. The fact
is that we are now already metamorphosing into something
else- A North American Union comprised of Canada,
U.S.A.,and Mexico. The goal is an internally borderless
North America rid of the constitutional structures and
rules of the separate nations that created and protected
the democratic fabric of the respective peoples.
This Union is planned, directed, organized and coordinated
by unelected, unaccountable people of the military
/industrial complex with a few academic apologists thrown
in for good measure. It is being facilitated by all three
elected governments. This is the same military/industrial
complex that General Eisenhower warned against.
This group is creating a despotic regime for the pursuit
of their interest (rapacious greed and power) which is
diametrically opposed to the needs and interests of the
citizens in all three countries. Their plan is to make
all of North America their power base acting in their
interest only. Forget the people
The two bodies (one corporate, one military) which have
been functioning for some time to create this treasonous
union are well advanced in that formation. They are: the
Canada-U.S.A-Mexico task force and The Binational
Military Planning Group.
1. The corporate side: the Canada-U.S.A-Mexico task
force
The Canada-U.S.A-Mexico Task Force is comprised of the
leading CEOs of the most powerful corporations from
Canada, USA and Mexico, prominent former officials,
businessmen, and academic apologists from all three
countries. They are:
(a.) From U.S.A. - Council on Foreign Relations;
(b). From Mexico- the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos
Internacionales;
(c.) From Canada: Canadian Council of Chief Executives-
Founded in 1976, the Canadian Council of Chief Executives
is Canada's premier business association composed of the
chief executives of 150 leading Canadian enterprises. The
CCCE was the Canadian private sector leader in the
development and promotion of the Canada-United States Free
Trade Agreement during the 1980s and of the subsequent
trilateral North American Free Trade Agreement.
This task force is currently headed by Canada’s own former
Liberal Deputy Prime Minister, John Manley (who allegedly
seeks to replace Paul Martin as Prime Minister).
This task force was sanctioned by the three leaders, Prime
Minister Martin, President Bush and President Fox, in
March of 2005 at a special meeting in Texas at Bush’s
ranch at which the three leaders signed the Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North America.
In practice, the elected governments of the three
countries are the willing dupes promulgating laws that
impose a police state in order to enforce rules that
enable the new regime. Some would call this treason.
(2) The military side: The Binational Military Planning
Group-
Founded in late 2002,its mandate is to lay the groundwork
for the integration of a Canada -US military command
structure, and the militarization of civilian law
enforcement, and judicial function in Canada and the USA.
Their stated mandate is first to prepare contingency plans
to respond to land and sea threats, and attacks, and other
major emergencies; and second, to plan for coordinated
response for military assistance to civil authorities in
the event of threat or attack, and for civil emergency
in Canada and the USA.
Neither of the Task Force nor the Military Planning group
is accountable to the US Congress, nor to the Canadian
House of Commons, nor to the Mexican government, and
certainly Not to the citizenry.
1. Let’s focus first on the corporate side, the Canada-
USA- Mexico task force.
See: Trilateral Task Force Recommendations
http://www.usembassycanada.gov/content/can_usa/northamericancommunity_TF_final.pdf
And: Trilateral Commission website
http://www.trilateral.org/
And: Council on Foreign Relations: Trinational call for a
North American Economic and Security Community by 2010
http://www.cfr.org/publication.html?id=7914
These Canadian, U.S., and Mexican elites are the same
players who gave us the FTA and the NAFTA. They continue
their work creating a North American union that
integrates our economies and transforms our total
policy-making capacity away from the public interest and
away from the public good.
This plan goes by various names:
Deep Integration
Harmonization
NAFTA-plus
the "Big Idea" (C.D. Howe Institute)
the "North American Security and Prosperity Initiative"
Americanization
The plan of this Canada-U.S.-Mexico task force is to
establish a continent-wide customs union with a common
approach to trade, energy, immigration, law enforcement
and security that would virtually eliminate existing
national borders. The task force released its
recommendations for a common North American in May 17/18
2005.There was minor reference to it in mainstream media-
no headline presentation. The recommendations include:
* * a common security perimeter by 2010.
* * a North American Border Pass with biometric
identifiers.
* * a unified border and expanded customs facilities.
** a single economic space: (It is this area that would
destroy any opportunity to bring back the use of our Bank
of Canada.)
* * a common external tariff.
* * seamless movement of goods within North America.
* * Full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S. (Note
they apparently do not want the Mexican labourers??)
* * A North American energy strategy -as a regional
alternative to Kyoto.
* * Review those sectors of NAFTA that were excluded.
* * A North American regulatory plan that would include
"open skies and open roads" and a unified approach on
food, health, and the environment.
* * Expand temporary worker programs and create a "North
American preference" for immigration for citizens of North
America. * * A North American Investment Fund to build
infrastructure to connect Mexico's poorer regions in the
south to the market to the north.
* * Restructure and reform Mexico's public finances.
* * Fully develop Mexican energy resources (Mexico wisely
kept their energy out of NAFTA)
* * A permanent tribunal for trade and investment
disputes.( Here is where any vestige of democratic
government disappears)
* * An annual North American summit meeting.
* * A Tri-national Competition Commission with a common
approach to trade remedies.
* * Scholarships for a network of Centers for North
American Studies. (To serve the corporations)
Below is the list of the Members of the Independent Task
Force on North America- Many are members of the Trilateral
Commission - a similar corporate interest group from the
USA, Japan and Western Europe )
Minister Pedro Aspe (Mexican co-chair), Protego
Mr. Thomas S. Axworthy, Queen's University
Ms. Heidi S. Cruz, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Mr. Nelson W. Cunningham, Kissinger McLarty Associates
Mr. Thomas P. d'Aquino (Canadian co-vice chair), Canadian Council of Chief
Executives
Mr. Alfonso de Angoitia, Grupo Televisa, S.A.
Dr. Luis de La Calle Pardo, De la Calle, Madrazo, Mancera, S.C.
Professor Wendy K. Dobson, University of Toronto
Dr. Robert A. Pastor (U.S. co-vice chair), American University
Mr. Andréés Rozental, (Mexican co-vice chair), Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos
Internacionales
Dr. Richard A. Falkenrath, The Brookings Institution
Dr. Rafael Fernandez de Castro, Instituto Tecnolóógico Autóónomo de Mééxico
Mr. Ramóón Alberto Garza, Montemedia
The Honorable Gordon D. Giffin, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP
Mr. Allan Gotlieb, Donner Canadian Foundation
Mr. Michael Hart, Norman Paterson School of International Affairs
Mr. Carlos Heredia, Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales
The Honorable Carla A. Hills, Hills & Company
Dr. Gary C. Hufbauer, Institute for International Economics
Dr. Luis Rubio, CIDAC
Dr. Jeffrey J. Schott, Institute for International Economics
Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson, Heenan Blaikie
The Honorable James R. Jones, Manatt Jones Global Strategies
Dr. Chappell H. Lawson (Task Force Director), Massachusetts Institute of
Technology
The Honourable John P. Manley (Canadian co-chair), McCarthy Tetrault
Mr. David McD. Mann, Cox Hanson O'Reilly Matheson
Ms. Doris M. Meissner, Migration Policy Institute
The Honorable Thomas M.T. Niles, Institute for International Economics
The Honorable William F. Weld (U.S. co-chair),Leeds Weld & Co.
Mr. Raul H. Yzaguirre
The few media references to the task force parrot the Orwellian double speak of
the task force and politicians. The effect is to trick the people into believing
this process is something good for us. But if you read carefully, you can
identify that the regime change is all about the greed of an elite few. In
order to manipulate us into accepting the regime change, they pretend it will
protect us from "terrorists". Terrorism has become the external threat, the
bogey- man replacing Communism, just as Moslems have replaced Jews as
scapegoats..
From Reuters:
"NEW YORK (Reuters) - The United States, Canada and Mexico
should establish a common security perimeter to guard
against terrorism in North America, a tri-national
independent task force said in a report released on
Tuesday.
The countries should police their borders together to help
border trade, allow easier movement of citizens and to
keep out potential security threats, the task force said
at New York's Council on Foreign Relations.
‘If our two borders, the one between Canada and the United
States and the U.S. and Mexico, became a frontline for
security the impact that would have on normal relations
and economic relations would be profound,’ said
co-chairman John Manley, a former Canadian deputy prime
minister and minister of finance."
From All American Patriots News:
"May 17, 2005--North America is vulnerable on several
fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security
threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and
uneven economic development at home. In response to these
challenges, a tri-national, Independent Task Force on the
Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote
North American security and advance the well- being of
citizens of all three countries.
Pointing to increased competition from the European Union
and rising economic powers such as India and China in the
eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C.
Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, ‘We need a
vision for North America to address the new challenges.’
The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse
North American trading area that allows for the seamless
movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy
security.
John P. Manley, Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and
Minister of Finance said, ‘We are asking the leaders of
the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt
a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond,
the immediate problems of the present,’ ‘They could be the
architects of a new community of North America, not mere
custodians of the status quo.’" (My underlining.)
In other words, forget Canada; forget the United States of
America; forget the United States of Mexico. Sounds rather
treasonous to me!!
Let us be very clear here. What the task force addresses
is an economic/legal system in their interest with a
police state to enforce it.
This task force is extrapolating the globalization
process into a North American unit. Under the mantle of
the WTO (an agreement in its own right,) there is in
process a transformation of the forces of power in the
world from sovereign national control of resources over to
the global corporate control. It is what they call
"deregulation" and"privatization". That is why they
called all the agreements "Free Trade". They meant free
from regulations and controls that protect consumers and
the public generally, including protections from theft of
the commons.
Now the intent is for transfer from global corporate
control to regional corporate control, e.g., European
Union, North American Union; that is, corporate political
control free from government accountability to electors.
The North American task force seeks to create a unit even
freer from the vestigial citizen involvement that exists
in the E.U. (Britain and Australia are lackeys of the
United States.)
The FTA, the NAFTA, are well known. The Canadian Action
Party and other concerned Canadians have been detailing
the harm of these agreements for years. CAP has
steadfastly called for the abrogation of the FTA and
NAFTA. We have always said," Issue the 6 month notice to
abrogate!" The most recent justification for abrogation
is the U.S.’s refusal to pay back $5 billion they owe our
lumber industry for illegal duties the U.S. charged.
Despite years of proof of uneven and unfair use by the USA
of the rules of the FTA and NAFTA, including the unfair
closing of the U.S side of the border to Canadian beef,
the Liberals, Conservatives, the NDP, and the Bloc
Quebecois have refused to call for abrogation. It is only
in the face of the clarity of this latest U.S. abuse of
Canada that all of them are beginning to pretend they are
not wimps or complicit dupes. Still, none of them is
willing to say, "Abrogate, period!" How much longer are
we willing to tolerate these politicians who not only
meekly submit to being stomped on, but then turn to their
attacker and apologize for being victimized?
Why do they do this? It is because all of their most
influential leaders are members of this elite group who
seek to remove democracy and entrench plutocracy. It is
not a question of what is good for the citizens of Canada,
U.S.A or Mexico. Note that the United States is turning
that $5 billion which has been stolen from the Canadian
lumber industry over to their own lumber barons, not their
general body of citizens.
This North American Impetus is a natural political
extension and outgrowth of all these global economic
arrangements as the greedy financial elite look around for
the best ways to effect their goals. It has everything to
do with the destruction of democracy and the death of
freedom. These corporate bodies have no allegiance to the
nation they happen to operate in, or to its people.
Other harmful international agreements include the General
Agreement on Trade and Services, (GATS), the Financial
Services Investment Agreement, (FSIA), the Free Trade Area
of the Americas, (FTAA), the Central American Free Trade
Agreement, (CAFTA). All of these grow out of the World
Trade Organization, (WTO), itself being an agreement that
commands an ongoing deregulation and privatization
process.
The eventual goal is to have all of North and South
America as one regional power block stronger than anything
in Europe or Asia. Fortunately for human beings, South
America has not been the easy pushover that the
corporations presumed, so they have to settle for a North
American Union for now. (Why do you think Pat Robertson, a
U.S. religious leader, on national U.S. media, and on
Canada’s C.B.C., recently called for the Assassination of
Hugo Chavez, the Leader of Venezuela?)
There exists a North America Bureau of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade.
See:
http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/can-am/main/front_page/north_american_bureau-en.asp
The role of the North America Bureau is twofold:
* to advance, in cooperation with other parts of the
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade,
Canadian diplomatic missions in the United States and
Mexico, and other Canadian Government departments and
agencies, Canada's wide-ranging interests in its relations
with the United States and Mexico; and
* to promote Canada's broad foreign policy objectives
within and through the Canada-US and the Canada-Mexico
bilateral relationships.
In fulfilling this role, the Bureau is organized into four
divisions:
* the United States Relations Division,
* the United States Transboundary Division, and
* the United States Business Development Division and
* The Mexico Division
2. Let’s now look at the second body, The Binational
Military Planning Group. (Source Michel Chossudovsky.
http://www.globalresearch.ca
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CH0411C.html
Chossudovsky says the people of NORAD and the Binational
Planning Group are the same . They operate the same
command. NORAD has essentially been scrapped. It has been
integrated into US Northern Command, and Canada has
become a de facto member of NORTHCOM under the auspices of
the Bi-national Planning Group. (BPG).
So, when Prime Minister Paul Martin said "no" to Star
Wars, he did not really say no. He lied to us.
The Binational Planning Group was set up in late 2002
after Prime Minster Chrétien refused to join NORTHCOM. The
creation of Northcom had been announced unilaterally in
April 2002 by Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfield who
dictated that the US Northern Command would have
jurisdiction over the entire North American region.
Canada and Mexico were presented with a fait accompli. US
Northern Command’s jurisdiction set out in the US DoD
includes the continental US ,all of Canada, Mexico,
portions of the Caribbean, contiguous waters in the
Atlantic and Pacific oceans up to 500 miles off the
Mexican, US and Canadian coastlines, as well as the
Canadian arctic.
Northcom was being quietly negotiated with Ottawa’s
Department of Defence and the PMO. Under NORTHCOM the US
military will cross the border and deploy troops anywhere
in Canada, in our provinces as well as station American
warships in Canadian territorial waters. The locale for
these discussions is not in Canada, but at the Peterson
Air Force base in Colorado, the headquarters of the US
Northern Command(Northcom) .
Chossudovsky reports that Rumsfeld is said to have boasted
that "the NORTHCOM with all of North America as its
geographic command ‘is part of the greatest transformation
of the Unified Command Plan (UCP) since its inceptions in
1947'"
When PM Chretien refused to sign on the dotted line,
Rumsfield et al, the military establishment, both US and
Canadian, refused to take no for an answer. They
immediately created a new name to accommodate the concept
of NORTHCOM and called it the Binational Planning group .
It is still operating out of the Peterson Air force base.
It was supposed to last only for two years but its
mandate has been renewed to spring of 2006. (Note- look
for a Canadian election before the expiry date.
The BPG has a staff of 50 US and Canadian military
planners laying the groundwork fo the integration of
Canada -US military command structures. The BPG works in
close coordination with the Canada-US Military Cooperation
Committee at the Pentagon- responsible for detailed joint
military planning.
Respecting missile defence, Martin told the press on
February 22,2005: "[The Americans] were told we will not
participate." "It is a firm 'no.'"
Chossudovsky reminds us that simultaneously, Frank McKenna
ambassador designate to the US, in a contradictory
statement, told the media " Canada's participation in the
controversial BMD is a "done deal". It's de facto. It was
part of a negotiation process initiated two years ago.
"We're part of it now and the question is what more do we
need?" said McKenna. "There's no doubt, in looking back,
... that the NORAD amendment has given, has created part,
in fact a great deal, of what the United States means in
terms of being able to get the input for defensive
weaponry."
What Ambassador McKenna was hinting at, without revealing
the substance of US-Canada negotiations (behind closed
doors), is that NORAD is a defunct military body.
So the military side of this treason is waiting for
government sanction in the spring of 2006 after our next
election. Once again the arrogant confidence is at least
irritating if not alarming.
Even though there is no official sanction yet, de facto
sanctions exist as Canada is participating more and more
in the US wars.. Now we have more troops in Afghanistan,
and General Hilliard is warning Canadians to be prepared
for the body bags returning to Canada. There is
something really wrong with this picture.
In a comprehensive report prepared shortly before the
Bush-Martin talks November 2004, the BPG made
recommendations on: " how the two countries' militaries
can work together more effectively to counter these
[terrorist] threats. ... formalizing cooperation already
taking place on an informal basis." (Statement of BPG
spokesman, US Department of Defence Information, November
3, 2004)
With regard to military negotiations, McKenna knows what
is happening behind the scenes. He was on the board of
directors of the Carlyle Group together with Bush Senior
and Frank Carlucci (The bin Laden family were investors in
Carlyle until 9/11).
Carlyle, is the leading private equity investor in the
aerospace and defence industries in the US and Canada. It
plays a key role in the formulation of US defence and
foreign policy. It has a vested interest in Canada's
integration into NORTHCOM.
Michel Chossusdovsky points out that "Canada’s
participation in the Bilateral Planning Group and hence
the Northern Command implies Canada's acceptance not only
of Star Wars, but of the entire US war agenda, requiring
significant hikes in Canada's defence spending. The
latter are intended to fuel the military-industrial
complex. Canada's defence contractors are supportive of
this process."
Chossudovsky points to Canada's February 2005 budget,
released on the day following P.M. Paul Martin's
categorical "No" to the Missile Defence Program.
Chossudovsky notes that "an additional $12.8 billion
dollars (Cdn) (over the next five years), has added to
Canada's spiralling defence budget. The stated objective
is to ‘burnish the country's credibility as a global
peacekeeping partner’."
Chossudovsky notes further that the budget is not meant
to refurbish the country's conventional military hardware,
but rather will be channelled to Canadian weapons
producers, many of which are affiliates of US defence
conglomerates, upon Canada's accession to NORTHCOM.. He
lists some major players in Canada's defence industry:
General Dynamics (Canada), Bell Helicopter Textron
(Canada), General Motors Defense, CAE Inc, Bombardier,
SNC-Lavalin Group, etc.
So we can see that those two bodies, the trilateral task
force and the Bilateral Planning group, are well
entrenched in process.
The fact is that most Canadians oppose this deep economic
and military integration.
Now the greedy corporations are staking out a claim on
more and more land in a region of North America in order
to be bigger, and better and more profitable than a group
of corporations from another regional block. The European
Union was the first block. There is a rising Asian block.
I am not the first to see the USA attacks on the middle
east as a means of preventing the Asian blocks from
becoming the most powerful . The third region is the
Americas. South America has not been an easy go for the
globalizers. So the focus is concentrating for now on
North America.)
By examination of the arrangements and deals happening
under our noses but by stealth, we can see that our
worries expressed over the years are coming to fruition.
The globalizers are well into the process of
implementing a clear regime run by them, about them, for
them, and enforced by governments. The masses of people do
not count except as cannon fodder in the wars of conquest
and as slaves for the production process .
There is every intention of regime change from
democracy to tyranny. Our governments are already the
willing whipping boys being the instruments of social
control. They have no shame in removing our civil
liberties and destroying our constitutional protections
.This is happening all around the world with the USA,
Britain, Australia and Canada being the most advanced in
the regime change process. It is an outrage and a disgrace
that Canada is now competing with Britain to become the
lowliest lick spittle groveling agent to the USA led
regime change process. There is nothing good in this
regime change process for the citizen.
---------------------------------
Connie Fogal, Leader ,Canadian Action Party/ parti action
Canadienne
Tel: (604)872 2128; or (604) 708 3372
(FAX: 604) 872 -1504
E-MAIL •••@••.•••
Canadian ActionParty Head office : # 385- 916 West
Broadway, Vancouver BC, V521K7; e mail:
•••@••.•••
.................................
"The world is not, in fact, ruled by global corporations.
It is ruled by the global financial system."
- David Korten
"The ability of a party to make a valuable contribution is
not dependent upon its capacity to offer the electorate a
genuine government option. Political parties... act as a
vehicle for the participation of individual citizens in
the political life of the country. ...Marginal or regional
parties tend to raise issues not adopted by national
parties. Political parties provide individual citizens
with an opportunity to express an opinion on the policy
and functioning of government. Each vote in support of a
party increases the likelihood that its platform will be
taken into account by those who implement policy, and
votes for parties with fewer than 50 candidates are an
integral component of a vital and dynamic democracy. "
- Figueroa v Canada (Attorney General) 2003 SCC 37
"Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security"
- Benjamin Franklin
"The constitution of Canada does not belong either to
Parliament, or to the Legislatures; it belongs to the
country and it is there that the citizens of the country
will find the protection of the rights to which they are
entitled"
- Supreme Court of Canada A.G. of Nova Scotia and
A.G. of Canada, S.C.R. 1951 pp 32
--
--------------------------------------------------------
http://cyberjournal.org
"Apocalypse Now and the Brave New World"
http://www.cyberjournal.org/cj/rkm/Apocalypse_and_NWO.html
Posting archives:
http://cyberjournal.org/cj/show_archives/?date=01Jan2006&batch=25&lists=newslog
Subscribe to low-traffic list:
•••@••.•••
___________________________________________
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes.
