2011-03-09
Richard Moore
Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?
Please do as you wish with this e-mail, but if you feel that this raises some legitimate questions in your mind please forward this to as many other people as possible. I also encourage you to cross check and research this information yourself rather than just accepting the information below as fact…..or fiction. The people of Christchurch and NZ deserve to at least be made aware of this important information. Many thanks for your help in raising awareness of this around NZ in honour of Christchurch and all its victims
Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster? This question sounds impossibly implausible but there is considerable evidence to suggest that the Christchurch earthquake is very suspicious and there is a lot of information that deserves to be seen and considered by all people of NZ regarding this question. Out of respect for the victims of Christchurch , we owe it to them to have this information below distributed across NZ and looked at and considered fully.
Firstly, are man made earthquakes possible? The answer is absolutely yes. Here is a very quick science lesson on this and then we will look at the scientific evidence and circumstantial evidence that casts some highly significant suspicions around the Christchurch earthquake:
What is HAARP?
High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project. See: www.haarp.net http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
- The main HAARP facility is based in Alaska (although there are several others) and is capable of sending several billion watts of electromagnetic pulses into the upper atmosphere and can bounce these pulses off either the upper ionosphere or off satellites, and direct these pulses to a location anywhere on the earth, either above or below ground level.
- Could these pulses potentially be used to create earthquakes? Yes. This is the same sort of technology that geologists use to help locate oil and gas fields underground, however they use only a tiny fraction of the power level that HAARP uses. With the power level that HAARP has, geologists have stated that this would certainly be enough to potentially cause a large earthquake. See brief segment of a TV documentary in 2010 explaining this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BR6O3kJTqaI
HAARP pulses require assistance in the atmosphere
- For HAARP pulses to be more effectively transmitted through the atmosphere, it helps greatly to have something in the atmosphere to assist this. If large quantities of materials such as fine particle aluminium are present in the atmosphere it can create a type of ‘atmospheric plasma’ for the HAARP pulses to travel through.
- This process of ‘seeding the atmosphere’ with large amounts of fine particle aluminium has been seen in huge abundance across the South Island over the past few months; numerous aircraft have been seen leaving long thick trails of a white substance that stays in the sky for many hours and spreads out to form milky, hazy, metallic looking clouds. Please See http://chemtrailsnz.co.cc/ and see the last 30 seconds of the documentary link above
Could some nations already be using this technology to artificially create earthquakes?
There is much evidence and discussion to strongly indicate that at least several nations are already actively using this type of technology for a variety of potential purposes based around substantial manipulation of the environment. Here is just one of numerous quotes and references regarding this: “Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves… So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations…It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our [counter terrorism] efforts.” – US Secretary of Defence, William Cohen, 1997
Strong evidence that HAARP was in operation over Christchurch just prior to the earthquake 1. There was a large amount of spraying of white ‘atmospheric aerosol material’ into the sky by aircraft in the surrounding area of Christchurch witnessed by many people in the days leading up to the quake. Outside of the NZ Govt, who else would have the capacity to utilise aircraft in NZ air space in this way? Probably only the US Airforce from their multiple bases within NZ.
2. Photos of the sky in the area on Feb 21 show large amounts of multi coloured ‘rainbow clouds’, Please Seehttp://thecontrail.com/photo/albums/rangiora-sky-crap-day-before that many experts believe are related to HAARP activity and which also appeared in the skies in exactly the same way just before other recent large earthquakes, Please See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKMTSDzU1Z4&feature=related
3. The measurement charts showing the level of power being emitted from various HAARP installations show a sudden surge of power being emitted simultaneously from three different HAARP installations in the US just a few hours before the Christchurch quake (Scientists believe that there would likely be a small time delay between HAARP activity and a potential seismic event such as this). These three HAARP power surges are shown on one of the graphs on the link below. A ‘HAARP Induction Magnetometer’ graph on the link below also shows the same HAARP surge at the same time. This simultaneous HAARP surge coincided with what is termed a ‘global quake’ where there was a small amount of seismic activity recorded at places all across the planet (shown on one of the graphs on the link below), however by far the strongest of these ‘global quakes’ was the Christchurch quake. It could be theorised that the large EM pulses being emitted from the three HAARP installations had a minor effect on the whole planet but that they were potentially focussed onto the Christchurch area. http://thecontrail.com/photo/albums/activiy-around-the
4. Coinciding with the time period of increased HAARP activity, there was a mass stranding of dolphins in the Thames Estuary on Feb 21 and there was a mass stranding of whales at Stewart Island on Feb 20 (http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/4681546/100-stranded-whales-die-on-Stewart-Island). This is very consistent with the other recent large earthquakes mentioned above which were also preceded by mass strandings of dolphins and whales in the 48 hours prior to the quakes hitting. It is thought that electromagnetic pulses from HAARP can seriously disrupt the navigation systems of dolphins and whales as they are used to receiving EM pulses from below them rather than from above them. 5. The area where this earthquake hit and where the original Christchurch earthquake hit in September 2010 has no previously significant earthquake fault line and geologists are very surprised by these earthquakes occurring there. This geological anomaly is the same as with the Haiti earthquake. The strange circumstances of the Feb 22 earthquake have caused disagreement by earthquake experts as to the exact cause.http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/8918396/dispute-on-whether-latest-quake-is-an-aftershock/ Other strange coincidences and anomalies with the Christchurch earthquake 1. 9 members of US Congress were in Christchurch for a summit meeting on Feb 21 & 22 but left Christchurch 2.5 hours before the earthquake hit and relocated to Wellington even though the meeting was not due to finish until the evening of Feb 22nd. (http://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/report-nine-us-congressmen-left-christchurch-right-before-quake-hit/) 2. The US Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, was supposed to be visiting Christchurch and speaking at the summit meeting on Feb 22, but on Feb 18 announced she was cancelling her visit 3. The Deputy Administrator of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), Timothy Manning, just happened to be in Christchurch at the time with a US delegation. (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2011/02/fema_official_in_new_zealand_w.html) All of the rest of the delegation left Christchurch shortly before the quake hit except for Mr Manning who stayed behind, and then after the quake hit he assisted with directing the emergency response. Exactly the same thing happened with FEMA delegates with the Haiti earthquake. In Haiti , the FEMA delegates just happened to be there at the time conducting training exercises for responding to major earthquakes.
4. Recently retired US Admiral Thad Allen just happened to be in Christchurch at the time of the earthquake. Admiral Allen directed the US federal response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and the Gulf Oil disaster. (http://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/admiral-thad-allen-in-christchurch-at-time-of-earthquake/)
5. 116 members of the Singapore army just happened to be in Christchurch at the time for training exercises and were also able to assist with the response operation
6. Venezuela President, Hugo Chavez stated on Fox News shortly after the Haiti earthquake in 2010 that ‘the United States apparently possesses an earthquake weapon that set off the catastrophic quake in Haiti’ and also said that ‘the Haiti quake was caused by a US test of an experimental shockwave system that can also create weather anomalies which cause floods, droughts, and hurricanes (our Australian and Queensland cousins may be interested in that last piece of information)
7. Following the Haiti earthquake, Venezuelan news also reported ‘the US government’s HAARP program may also be to blame for the 7.8 earthquake in China in 2008’, and said ‘the cataclysmic ruin in Haiti was only a test run for a much bigger game: the coming showdown with Iran’
Conclusions
Has the US military been carrying out tests on a secret new weapon system using huge electromagnetic pulses from HAARP installations? The Christchurch earthquake bears some very strange and remarkable similarities to other recent major earthquakes that have also been suspected of HAARP activity. There is significant evidence that atmospheric conditions in the Christchurch area had been ‘primed’ for HAARP activity, that multiple HAARP installations in the US were simultaneously activated to a high level just prior to the Christchurch earthquake, and that Christchurch seemed to be the focal point of a ‘global quake’ around that time. Why were all those US delegates, US emergency response officials, and other international personnel in Christchurch at the time? And why did 9 members of US Congress suddenly leave Christchurch and relocate to Wellington just 2.5 hours before the quake hit even though their meeting wasn’t due to finish until that evening, but they left behind the Deputy Administrator of the United States Federal Emergency Management Agency and another high level US federal emergency response official who were then subsequently and conveniently on hand to assist with the emergency response (just as in Haiti)? Did they know something was coming and were they preparing for something?
Was the Christchurch earthquake a man made event as part of a US weapons testing programme or some other unknown purpose? And if so, why Christchurch?
We must remain objective about all this but there are serious questions raised here and the victims of Christchurch and all the people of NZ deserve these questions to be looked at fully.