³Pakistan's ISI has a shady record of supporting terrorist
organizations on the one hand while helping British police
and intelligence officials on the on the other hand.²
We might also note that the head of ISI was named by the FBI as the 'moneybags'
for the alleged 19 hijackers, but this was never mentioned again: at the time of
the 911 attacks, he was having breakfast with the heads of the Congressional
Intelligence committees. My guess is that he wanted to protect himself from
'taking the fall' for the attacks.
rkm
--------------------------------------------------------
Original source URL:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060814&articleId=2960
The Foiled UK Terror Plot and the "Pakistani Connection"
By Michel Chossudovsky
August 14, 2006
Summary
The initial reports of the Home Office point to the active collaboration of
Pakistani Military Intelligence in uncovering the alleged terror plot. From the
outset, most of the intelligence which led to the arrests in the UK was
apparently gathered by Pakistan's military intelligence (ISI), which is said to
"have tipped off MI5":
While actively collaborating with the British police investigation, the Inter
Services Intelligence (ISI) is known to have supported and financed a number of
"Islamic terror groups" including Al Qaeda. In fact the terrorist training camps
in Pakistan and Afghanistan were set up in the early 1980s with the support of
the ISI and the CIA. And the leaders of these various Islamic organizations were
also indoctrinated in the ISI sponsored madrassas.
Pakistan's ISI has a shady record of supporting terrorist organizations on the
one hand while helping British police and intelligence officials on the on the
other hand.
Recent press reports suggest that the ISI is still running the terrorist
training camps:
Two Pakistani Islamic militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Sunni group
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi are allegedly involved in the UK terror plot. The Pakistani
authorities have put Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, the founder of Laskhar-e-Taiba under
house arrest. Ironically, Lashkar e Taiba, which now operates clandestinely, is
one of the main Kashmir rebel groups which had been supported and financed by
the ISI, yet, at the same time, it is the ISI which has been entrusted in
investigating Lashkar's role in the UK terror plot.
Two other UK-based outfits Hizbul Tehrir and Al Mahajroon, are allegedly also
involved. According to former CIA intelligence analyst Jim Loftus Al Mahjajoon,
has been supported by MI6. (See Michel Chossudovsky, London 7/7 Terror Suspect
Linked to British Intelligence? 1 August 2005)
What are the implications? What does this imply in relation to London Met's
police investigation?
The London Police Anti-Terrorist Branch (SO13) headed by Peter Clarke together
with MI6, The Secret Intelligence Service, and MI5, The Security Service (which
operates under the authority of Home Secretary John Reid), are working hand in
glove with a Pakistani based intelligence agency which has supported known
terrorist organizations, while also collaborating with its Western counterparts
"in going after the terrorists".
The facts speak for themselves. The least we might ask at the outset of the
British police investigation is:
€ How reliable is the information transmitted from Pakistan's ISI to its
British police and intelligence counterparts? The sweeping Home Office
statements that the plot would have resulted in "an unimaginable loss of human
life", were in large part based on information out of Rawalpindi, Pakistan,
courtesy of Scotland Yard's Pakistani partner: The Inter Services Intelligence
(ISI).
€ Is the credibility of Scotland Yard impaired by its working relationship with
an organization which, for the last 25 years, has promoted international
terrorism?
€ What would be the perceptions of the British and American public were they to
learn that the London Metropolitan police was conducting its investigation with
the assistance of an organization known to have close links to Osama bin Laden's
Al Qaeda?
Can an independent police investigation be conducted with the active
participation of British and US intelligence, knowing that both MI6 and the CIA
have links (either directly or via the ISI) to "Islamic terrorist
organizations".
Summary of article added 15 August 2006
Complete Article
The announcement by the British Home Office of a foiled terror plot to
simultaneously blow up as many as ten airplanes on transatlantic flights,
conveys the impression that it is the Western World rather than the Middle East
which is under attack.
Had the terrorist plot gone ahead as planned, it would have resulted in "the
loss of life on an unprecedented scale", said Home Secretary John Reid. (BBC, 10
August 2006).
"We are confident we have disrupted a plan by terrorists to cause untold death
and destruction.... Put simply, this was intended to be mass murder on an
unimaginable scale", said Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan police, Paul
Stephenson. (Complete statement, 10 August 2006)
The London terror warning has served to divert World public attention from the
war in Lebanon and the atrocities committed by coalition forces in the Middle
East.
Realities have been twisted and turned upside down. A fear and intimidation
campaign has been launched. The "civilized" Western World is threatened by
"extremists" and "homegrown Islamic terrorists":
"The global loathing for the United States and its ally, the United Kingdom, has
helped corrupt the minds of a generation of disaffected young Muslims..."
Meanwhile, the real "mass murder on an unimaginable scale" (to use Scotland
Yard's expression) committed in Lebanon at the height of a major escalation of
the Israeli led invasion, was barely acknowledged by the Western media.
President Bush stated (August 10) that the planned terror plot was
"..a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will
use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation".
Media Disinformation
The global media is inundated with "authoritative" stories on the foiled UK
terror plot "to smuggle liquid bomb components in hand luggage" onto
transatlantic flights. The alleged plot involves some 50 British born Muslims,
with insidious links to Al Qaeda and terror groups in Pakistan.
CNN's top journalists were rushed from the war theater in Lebanon to cover
unfolding events in London, England. While Israel continues to target
civilians, the Western media has its eyes riveted on what is now being described
as a foiled "Second 9/11", which was allegedly slated to occur on the 11th of
September, on the day of commemoration of 9/11:
"It could have been a second 9/11 -sized slaughter..."
"[W]e could have woken up this morning and the news could have been that Act II,
the second 9/11 could have occurred. And thank God it did not, because we know
the goal of those enemies that want to kill innocent people here. (Fox News,
Hannity Colmes, 10 August 2006)
In the days following the British Home Secretary's announcement, the media
disinformation campaign went into full gear. CNN's buzz words are: "Target USA",
"Could it happen right here in the United States?..."
The objective of the media campaign is to instill fear and intimidation: "The
British Home secretary, ... warned that another terrorist attack on Britain is
very likely..."; "MI5 and the police are investigating 'dozens and dozens' of
possible Al Qaeda inspired plots to cause mass murder in Britain" (Independent,
14 August 2006)
"Counter-terrorism" and war propaganda are intertwined: The message in several
British and US media points to "preemptive warfare" as a justifiable act of
"self defense" against what Condoleeza Rice calls "the State sponsors of
terrorism", who are preparing a "Second 911".
The hidden agenda is to build public acceptance for the next stage of the Middle
East war which is directed against Syria and Iran, while also weakening the
antiwar movement.
The Pakistani Connection
While it may be premature to comment on the police investigation at this early
stage, due to the lack of information, there are, nonetheless, a number of
obvious flaws and contradictions in the statements emanating from Scotland Yard
and Britain's Home Office.
The initial reports of the Home Office point to the active collaboration of
Pakistani Military Intelligence in uncovering the alleged terror plot. From the
outset, most of the intelligence which led to the arrests in the UK was
apparently gathered by Pakistan's military intelligence, who is said to "have
tipped off MI5":
"The plot to blow up passenger planes bound for the US from Britain by making
bombs onboard was revealed for the first time by Pakistan's prime intelligence
agency, which then brought it into the notice of its counterpart agencies in the
US and the UK, ... The agencies of all the three countries then launched a
successful operation in unison to foil the plot. Well-placed sources revealed to
The News on conditions of anonymity that the operation was coordinated at the
highest level by all the three agencies. The heads of governments of all three
countries were also kept abreast with the efforts in this regards.
Pakistan's top intelligence agency's chief, Lt-Gen Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani,
personally supervised the coordination of the three agencies. Gen Kiyani, who is
director-general of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), returned from London
only last week. The ISI chief and senior aides travelled regularly to the West
and even across the Atlantic in this endeavour and not only unearthed the plot
but also rendered tangible assistance with precision in nabbing the suspects."
(The News website, Islamabad, 12 August 2006)
Unfolding Contradictions
Of significance in assessing "the reliability" of the intelligence transmitted
by the ISI to its British and US counterparts, are the detailed documented links
of Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI) to the "Islamic terror network".
While actively collaborating with the British police investigation, the Inter
Services Intelligence (ISI) is known to have supported and financed a number of
"Islamic terror groups" including Al Qaeda. In fact the terrorist training camps
in Pakistan and Afghanistan were set up in the early 1980s with the support of
the ISI and the CIA. And the leaders of these various Islamic organizations were
also indoctrinated in the ISI sponsored madrassas.
The ISI was instrumental in the creation of the militant Jammu and Kashmir
Hizbul Mujahideen (JKHM) in the late 1980s. Confirmed by the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), it has also supported and provided financial assistance (during
the entire post-Cold War era), to the two main Pakistan-based Kashmir rebel
groups, Lashkar-e-Taiba, (Army of the Pure) and Jaish-e-Muhammad (Army of
Mohammed), which claimed responsibility for the terror attack on the Indian
parliament in October 2001.
According to the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR):
[T]hrough its Interservices Intelligence agency (ISI), Pakistan has provided
funding, arms, training facilities, and aid in crossing borders to Lashkar and
Jaish. This assistance-an attempt to replicate in Kashmir the international
Islamist brigade's "holy war" against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan-helped
introduce radical Islam into the long-standing conflict over the fate of
KashmirŠ
See Council on Foreign Relations, "Terrorism: Questions and Answers, Harakat
ul-Mujahideen, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Muhammad" , Washington 2002, )
More recently, an Associated Press report suggested that Jaish-e-Mohammed was
allegedly behind the Mumbai July 2006 train bombing that killed 190 people:
" [A] US official who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity
pointed to another group, Jaish-e-Mohammed, or Army of Mohammed, which is also
affiliated with al-Qaeda, according to the Bush administration. Targeting trains
at rush hour traffic is a tactic Jaish-e-Mohammed favors, the official said"
(Associated Press Report quoted by Larry Chin, July 2006).
The ISI has also provided support to the Bangladeshi based
Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, the South East Asian Jemaah Islamiah (JI), the two
main Chechen rebel factions, and other terrorist organizations. The 2002 Bali
attack in the Kuta seaside resort was allegedly perpetrated by Jemaah Islamiah,
which had previously been supported by Pakistani Military Intelligence.
And the ISI, which is actively assisting Scotland Yard is also alleged to have
played a behind the scenes role in the 9/11 attacks.
The Role of Pakistan's Military Intelligence in 9/11
On the 9th of September 2001, two days before 9/11, the charismatic leader of
Afghanistan's Northern Alliance Commander Ahmad Shah Masood was assassinated in
a suicide attack. The Northern Alliance had informed the Bush Administration
that Pakistani intelligence (ISI) was allegedly implicated in the assassination.
(The Northern Alliance's statement was released on 14 September 2001, quoted in
a Reuters report on 15 September 2001)
Moreover, according to several reports, Pakistan's ISI allegedly also played a
role in supporting the presumed 9/11 terrorists. Of particular significance is
an FBI report leaked to ABC News in late September 2001:
"As to September 11th, federal authorities have told ABC News they have now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan, to two banks in Florida, to
accounts held by suspected hijack ring leader, Mohammed Atta. ... It's all part
of what has been a successful FBI effort so far to close in on the hijacker's
high commander, the money men, the planners and the mastermind." (Statement of
Brian Ross reporting on information conveyed to him by the FBI, ABC News, This
Week, September 30, 2001,. emphasis added)
The FBI report was corroborated by an official Indian intelligence document
(apparently been dispatched to Washington), which was reported by Agence France
Presse (AFP) and The Times of India. These reports suggested that financial
assistance to the 911 ringleader had been transferred on the orders of the Head
of Pakistan's ISI:
"[The money was] wired to WTC hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan, by Ahmad
Umar Sheikh, at the instance of [the Head of Pakistan's Military Intelligence
(ISI)] General Mahmoud [Ahmad]." See Times of India, Delhi, 9 October 2001,
AFP, 10 October 2001, Further details, see Michel Chossudovsky, America's "War
on Terrorism", Global Research, 2005) .
"ISI Fingerprints"
Some of the contradictions underlying the recent role of the ISI, were addressed
in a 2005 debate at the Nixon Center (7 July 2005), which was broadcast on
C-Span:
Nikolas Guosdev: "You can see another one of these mainstream parties, Jammat-e-
Ulama-e-Isam, which is ... linked to the main Kashmiri radical groups --
Lashkar-e- Jhangvi, Harakat-ul-Mujahedin -- which serves as a logistical --
which helps al Qaeda and the Taliban in the the tribal areas in Pakistan.
Jaish-e-Muhammad, you can see all of that fits in.
The fingerprints of the ISI, by the way, are all over this. And the question, of
course, is whether it is an institutional policy or if it is through personal
connections and personal relationships.
Alexis Debat: "I agree with you that fingerprints can mean many things, and
there is certainly several ways that the ISI has been in contact with --
officially or unofficially -- with these groups. What I was referring to is that
these groups have been, and still are, at least for the majority of them,
instrumentalized by the ISI in Baluchistan and in Kashmir, in Afghanistan, and
there's considerable evidence that a lot of the trainers in Afghanistan in the
1990s were Pakistani -- retired Pakistani military officers, retired ISI."
(Nixon Center Discussion on Pakistan and Terrorism with Alexis Debat, Historian
and Terrorism analyst Nikolas Guosdev, Editor of the National Interest Journal,
emphasis added)
The Pakistan ISI - Scotland Yard Connection
Pakistan's ISI has a shady record of supporting terrorist organizations on the
one hand while helping British police and intelligence officials on the on the
other hand.
Was the ISI providing institutional support to the terror network or was this
support carried out through complex personal links by so-called "rogue elements"
within the ISI?
Has the ISI, under President Pervez Musharraf been duly reformed (as conveyed by
the mainstream media), to undertake its new role of combating rather than
supporting " Islamic terrorism"?
The evidence suggests that the ISI remains the core institutional architect (in
liaison with the CIA) of the "Islamic terror network", from the Soviet-Afghan
war to the present.
Recent Indian press reports (August 2, 2006) suggest that the ISI is still
running the terrorist training camps:
"[A]s many as 52 [ISI] terrorist training camps are still functioning in
Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir. (Statesman News Service, Delhi, 2 August
2006)
Britain's Sunday Times (August 13, 2006) corroborates these damning reports,
without, however, pointing fingers at the Home Office and Scotland Yard:
It was the ISI that turned the Taliban from a bunch of religious students into a
movement that took over Afghanistan. According to Hamid Karzai, president of
Afghanistan, ISI continues to provide a safe haven, training them to fight
British soldiers in Helmand....
Pakistan's problem is that extremist organizations and training camps, such as
those linked to the London bombers, were either created by, or supported and
used by, ISI." (emphasis added)
The Sunday Times underscores yet another apparent "inconsistency" by revealing
that the ISI is providing support to groups which are actually fighting British
troops in Afghanistan.
What are the implications? What does this imply in relation to London Met's
police investigation?
The London Police Anti-Terrorist Branch (SO13) headed by Peter Clarke together
with MI6, The Secret Intelligence Service, and MI5, The Security Service (which
operates under the authority of Home Secretary John Reid), are working hand in
glove with a Pakistani based intelligence agency which has supported known
terrorist organizations, while also collaborating with its Western counterparts
"in going after the terrorists".
The facts speak for themselves. The least we might ask at the outset of the
British police investigation is:
€ How reliable is the information transmitted from Pakistan's ISI to its
British police and intelligence counterparts? The sweeping Home Office
statements that the plot would have resulted in "an unimaginable loss of human
life", were in large part based on information out of Rawalpindi, Pakistan,
courtesy of Scotland Yard's Pakistani partner: The Inter Services Intelligence
(ISI).
€ Is the credibility of Scotland Yard impaired by its working relationship with
an organization which, for the last 25 years, has promoted international
terrorism?
€ What would be the perceptions of the British and American public were they to
learn that the London Metropolitan police was conducting its investigation with
the assistance of an organization known to have close links to Osama bin Laden's
Al Qaeda?
€ Can an independent police investigation be conducted with the active
participation of British and US intelligence, knowing that both MI6 and the CIA
have links (either directly or via the ISI) to "Islamic terrorist
organizations".
"The War on Terrorism"
According to Pakistani press reports (Dawn, August 12, 2006) two Pakistani
Islamic militant groups Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Sunni group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi
were involved in the UK terror plot. Two other UK-based outfits Al Mahajroon and
Hizbul Tehrir, are allegedly also involved.
Matiur Rehman "a senior figure" in Lashkar-e-Jhangvi is considered to be "the
possible mastermind behind the plot". Rehman, who is still "at large" is
identified according to The Independent as "Al-Qaeda's planning director".
One of the main suspects Rachid Rauf has been arrested by the ISI. The Pakistani
authorities have put Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, the founder of Laskhar-e-Taiba under
house arrest. Ironically, Lashkar e Taiba, which now operates clandestinely, is
one of the main Kashmir rebel groups which had been supported and financed by
the ISI, yet, at the same time, it is the ISI which has been entrusted in
investigating Lashkar's role in the UK terror plot.
Moreover, according to former CIA intelligence analyst Jim Loftus in relation to
last year's 7/7 London bomb attack, Al Mahjajoon, identified as a British based
organization in the foiled August terror attack, has been supported by MI6. (See
Michel Chossudovsky, London 7/7 Terror Suspect Linked to British Intelligence? 1
August 2005)
While channeling covert support to Mahjajoon [Muhajiroun], MI6 (The Secret
Intelligence Service) also collaborates with Scotland Yard's Anti-Terrorism
Branch, in liaison with US Homeland Security headed by Michael Chertoff and the
CIA.
This contradictory relationship between intelligence agencies and terror groups
should come as no surprise. Amply documented, Western intelligence agencies
including the CIA and MI6, in liaison with the ISI, are known to have supported
the "Islamic terror network" including Al Qaeda. (For further details see Michel
Chossudovsky, America's "War on Terrorism", Global Research, 2005)
The "War on Terrorism" is a fabrication. Al Qaeda, the "outside enemy" of the
West is a creation of the US intelligence apparatus. In intelligence parlance,
Al Qaeda is an "intelligence asset", an "instrument" of the intelligence
agencies.
The intelligence agencies oversee their "intelligence assets", which have a
certain degree of independence and autonomy in relation to their sponsors.
While they promote the terror network through covert operations, intelligence
agencies also engage in the legitimate practice of "counter-terrorism". The
latter is invariably a smokescreen, which essentially consists in "going after"
the organizations created and/or indirectly supported by the intelligence
apparatus.
The system of "color coded" terror alerts, the fear campaign, the terror
warnings, the anti-terrorist drills and exercises, in the name of "national
security" have become part of a heavily ritualized process which supports a
global military agenda. All of these various initiatives, including the campaign
against Islam, are undertaken to confuse public opinion --through media
disinformation-- into believing that the "outside enemy" is real and that the
"war on terrorism" waged in the Middle East, which has resulted in countless
civilian deaths, constitutes a justified "national security" objective.
Moreover, to sustain the "war on terrorism", US and British intelligence must
continue to support (through covert operations) the "Islamic terror network".
Without an "outside enemy" there is no "war on terrorism", no "just cause" for
waging a profit driven Middle East war of conquest, which responds to carefully
defined strategic and economic objectives.
Without the " war on terrorism", the war criminals in high office and their
powerful corporate sponsors do not have a leg to stand on. Their legitimacy
collapses like a deck of card.
Michel Chossudovsky is the author of the international best seller "The
Globalization of Poverty " published in eleven languages. He is Professor of
Economics at the University of Ottawa and Director of the Center for Research on
Globalization, at www.globalresearch.ca . He is also a contributor to the
Encyclopaedia Britannica. His most recent book is entitled: America¹s "War on
Terrorism", Global Research, 2005.
To order Chossudovsky's book America's "War on Terrorism", click here
Note: Readers are welcome to cross-post this article with a view to spreading
the word and warning people of the dangers of a broader Middle East war. Please
indicate source and copyright note.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of
the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on
Globalization.
To become a Member of Global Research
The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca grants
permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in their entirety, or
any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as long as the text & title
are not modified. The source must be acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink
address to the original CRG article must be indicated. The author's copyright
note must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or
other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: •••@••.•••
www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such
material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an
effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social
issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational
purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair
use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries: •••@••.•••
© Copyright Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2006
The url address of this article is:
www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=2960
© Copyright 2005 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Escaping the Matrix website http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal website http://cyberjournal.org
subscribe cyberjournal list mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/
Blogs:
cyberjournal forum http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/
Achieving real democracy http://harmonization.blogspot.com/
for readers of ETM http://matrixreaders.blogspot.com/
Community Empowerment http://empowermentinitiatives.blogspot.com/
Blogger made easy http://quaylargo.com/help/ezblogger.html
