Bush, Lawmakers Close to Stupid Deal on Stimulus Package


Richard Moore

"But Bush aides warned that they would not accept the large public works 
projects that some liberal lawmakers and union leaders are demanding." - right, 
whatever you do don't try something that might work. -rkm


Bush, Lawmakers Are Close to Deal on Stimulus Package
By Peter Baker and Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, January 23, 2008; A01

President Bush and congressional leaders moved closer to agreeing on a 
compromise economic rescue package yesterday, fending off fresh protests from 
both the right and the left as they rushed to respond to a cascading series of 
economic troubles and to head off a potential recession.

As markets roiled from a sharp sell-off around the world and the Federal Reserve
cut interest rates at home, Bush met with House and Senate leaders to work out a
package of tax breaks for consumers and businesses. In an important concession 
to Democrats, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. signaled that he is open 
to including breaks even for those who pay little to no income taxes.

Paulson plans to open formal talks on the details of the package this morning, 
and Senate leaders agreed to defer to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and 
House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) as chief negotiators. But 
officials said they were close to the framework of a roughly $145 billion plan. 
About two-thirds of the money would go for tax breaks for individuals, plus 
extended unemployment and food stamp benefits, while the other third would be 
for business tax breaks. Individuals would get rebates of as much as $800, and 
married couples as much as $1,600.

"I left the meeting that I just had in the Cabinet Room with the leadership in 
the House and the Senate with a very positive feeling," Bush said. "All of us 
understand that we need to work together. All of us understand that we need to 
do something that will be effective. And all of us understand that now is the 
time to work together to get a package done."

Pelosi told reporters that she is "confident that we will have a bipartisan 
agreement," citing turmoil in global markets as an additional reason to act 
quickly. "Now we see across the world that the state of the economy in the U.S. 
is having an impact, as well," she said. "So the urgency we feel at home is now 
even more urgent as we see the impact of our market on others."

Both sides tried to temper expectations about how quickly the plan could pass. 
With House Republicans leaving for a retreat tomorrow, administration and 
congressional aides said a deal will probably not happen until next week. Senate
Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said he hopes it could then be passed by 
Congress and sent to Bush's desk by the start of the next congressional recess, 
on Feb. 15.

"We hope we can do it more quickly than that, but our goal is to do it before we
break for the Presidents' Day recess," Reid said.

If a package is passed by both chambers and signed by Bush, it would take 
several weeks to get out tax rebate checks. The administration and the Internal 
Revenue Service have already begun discussing how to accelerate the disbursement
of those checks, but it will depend on how complicated the package is. After 
Bush signed the last such rebate into law in 2001, it took 6 1/2 weeks for the 
first checks to be mailed.

After a year of antagonism over issues including the Iraq war and children's 
health care, the collaboration between Bush and the two Democratic leaders was 
intended to signal to a nervous country that Washington can put aside partisan 
bickering to bolster the economy. The rapid pace of ominous bad economic news 
has persuaded incumbents of both parties to seek quick action, either out of 
conviction that it could stave off a recession or out of a desire to at least 
look as if they are acting.

The harmony among Bush and the leaders was so striking that Boehner, who has 
spent much of the last year complaining about Pelosi, said the two are 
essentially on the same page. Asked by reporters outside the White House what 
the issues of disagreement are, Boehner said, "There are no issues of 
disagreement right now."

But the volume of dissent from conservatives and liberals grew louder yesterday.
They agreed that bad policy is being railroaded into law for political reasons, 
even if they disagreed on what makes it bad.

Conservatives scorned one-time tax rebates to individuals as ineffective 
pandering and called for permanent breaks aimed at stoking investment. Liberals 
said Bush's proposed package already tilts toward the wealthy and pushed instead
for a broad investment in public works.

"We've tried tax rebates before, but they haven't worked as well as they should 
because previous rebates left out those at the very bottom of the economic 
ladder -- the families struggling every day to pay their bills, heat their homes
and pay their mortgages," Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) said on the Senate 
floor. "Now the president wants to do the same thing again. He's proposed a tax 
break in his stimulus package that would completely leave out the poorest 

Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) waved what he called "a red flag of reason," mocking 
the White House and both parties' congressional leaders for "chomping at the 
bit" to pass a stimulus plan for what he said would be merely political 
appearances. Gregg said he is particularly disappointed that Bush did not start 
on the conservative end, but rather "in the middle," while Democratic leaders 
offered liberal spending plans. "This thing is not moving in a fiscally 
responsible direction," he said, "but it's moving -- big-time."

The administration tried to deal with the complaint raised by Kennedy and other 
Democrats that the principles for stimulus that Bush laid out Friday would leave
out 50 million Americans who work, or who live on fixed incomes, but take in too
little to pay income taxes. Paulson said Friday that Bush wants "broad-based tax
relief for those who are paying taxes."

But Paulson reversed that formulation yesterday, saying in a speech to the U.S. 
Chamber of Commerce that "the package must reach a large number of citizens." By
saying "citizens" instead of "taxpayers," the secretary opened the door to ideas
advanced by Democrats to extend the short-term tax relief to those who pay 
little to no income taxes. Among ideas under consideration, officials said, 
would be sending checks to the lowest-income workers, increasing the 
earned-income tax credit that goes to low-income workers, and increasing the 
child tax credit.

Administration officials said privately that, despite philosophical concerns, 
they would be open as well to extending unemployment benefits and food stamps, 
as Democrats want to do. "If the pots don't become a large pot, I think a deal 
can be done," said one administration official, speaking on the condition of 
anonymity to discuss negotiating strategy.

But Bush aides warned that they would not accept the large public works projects
that some liberal lawmakers and union leaders are demanding.

Pelosi originally wanted to address infrastructure spending in a separate, 
follow-on measure to avoid complicating a bipartisan stimulus package, but Reid 
has pushed her to fight for at least some such projects because he argued that 
two bills would be difficult to pass in the narrowly divided Senate, 
congressional aides said.

Many economists, including Congressional Budget Office Director Peter R. Orszag,
have suggested that such spending would have little impact because it takes too 
long to allocate funds, solicit bids for construction contracts and begin the 
work. Democrats are coalescing around a modest pot of money for 
highway-resurfacing projects only, which they say are needed, are 
labor-intensive and are quicker to get started.

For their part, aides said, Democrats will probably agree to the depreciation 
tax breaks Bush wants for business, despite complaints from some in the party. 
Under the plan being discussed, small businesses would be allowed to deduct from
their taxes twice as much of their investments in new equipment -- $250,000 
instead of $125,000 -- and all businesses could write off investments more 

Staff writers Paul Kane and Jeffrey H. Birnbaum contributed to this report.

© 2008 The Washington Post Company

newslog archives: 

Escaping the Matrix: http://escapingthematrix.org/
cyberjournal: http://cyberjournal.org

The Phoenix Project:

rkm blog: "How We the People can change the world":

The Post-Bush Regime: A Prognosis

Community Democracy Framework: 

Moderator: •••@••.•••  (comments welcome)