Bolton to be dumped?


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Bolton May Not Return As U.N. Envoy
By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 10, 2006; A03

Key lawmakers said yesterday they would block the nomination of John R. Bolton 
as ambassador to the United Nations, all but killing chances for him to remain 
in the post past December.

For nearly 20 months, President Bush has tried, unsuccessfully, to get Bolton 
confirmed in a job he has held since August 2005. Bolton then received a recess 
appointment after not getting enough support in the Senate.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), the ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations 
Committee and its presumed chairman when the Democrats take control of the 
Senate in January, said yesterday that Bolton's nomination is "going nowhere."

"I see no point in considering Mr. Bolton's nomination again in the Foreign 
Relations Committee because, regardless of what happens there, he is unlikely to
be considered by the full Senate," Biden said in a statement.

The White House had hoped Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee (R.I.), a moderate Republican 
who earlier raised questions about Bolton and the administration's policies in 
the Middle East, would support Bolton after the election. But Chafee lost his 
seat Tuesday.

"On Tuesday, the American people sent a clear message of dissatisfaction with 
the foreign policy approach of the Bush administration," Chafee said in a 
statement. "To confirm Mr. Bolton to the position of U.N. ambassador would fly 
in the face of the clear consensus of the country that a new direction is called
for." Chafee said Bolton lacks the "collaborative approach" needed to make the 
United States "the strongest country in a peaceful world."

Without Chafee's support, Republicans on the committee do not have enough votes 
to recommend Bolton's confirmation.

Bolton's nomination, in early spring of 2005, fell apart within weeks. The 
Senate committee hearings were dominated by heated testimony from former 
colleagues and several intelligence officials; they described Bolton as a bully 
who pressured analysts, cherry-picked intelligence and hid information from the 
secretary of state. The committee did not support the nomination but agreed to 
send it to the full Senate for consideration.

Several Republicans then joined with Democrats to block a vote on the nomination
until the White House turned over documents relating to Bolton's tenure as 
undersecretary of state for arms control during Bush's first term. The White 
House refused, insisting that Bolton deserved a vote by the full Senate.

Bolton's recess appointment is set to expire at the end of December, when the 
current Congress goes out of session. With only a few months remaining, the 
White House tried again to get Bolton confirmed during the summer. The American 
Israel Public Affairs Committee came to the administration's aid, lobbying 
heavily for Bolton's nomination. It persuaded several Democrats to support 
Bolton but the nomination was snagged by Chafee.

White House spokesman Tony Snow would not predict yesterday whether Bolton would
get confirmed or say what the White House's contingency plans are if the 
nomination falls through again. "This is something that we think is important, 
that he stay there," Snow told reporters.

National security adviser Stephen J. Hadley urged senators to judge Bolton 
solely on his performance at the United Nations over the past year. "I would 
hope that people would step back, take a look at John's record up there, and 
reach the judgment that the president has reached -- that he does a terrific job
for the American people."

In a statement yesterday, Bush named five congressional priorities he hopes will
be tackled before the end of the year. Bolton was not on the list.

Yesterday, a White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the
administration had explored options for keeping Bolton at the United Nations. A 
second recess appointment is not possible, but officials considered making 
Bolton an "acting ambassador." But the official, who would discuss internal 
deliberations only on the condition of anonymity, said none of the options is 
appealing, especially given the strong opposition shown by the Democrats, who 
are poised to take over Congress.

If there is no confirmation, "we assume he'll probably resign," the official 
said. Several administration officials speculated that Zalmay Khalilzad, the 
ambassador to Iraq, could be a candidate to replace Bolton.

Post a Comment
View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Your User ID, richard, will be displayed with your comment.

Comments: (Limit 5,000 characters)

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate 
comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that 
are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author 
will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of 
our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies 
governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and 
discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy