Another Staged Charade From The War Criminals


Richard Moore

Original source URL:

Another Staged Charade From The War Criminals

Bush/Blair press conference feigns Iraqi support for Globalist occupation forces

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison | May 26 2006

Last night's Bush/Blair press conference was the latest in a long line of 
carefully choreographed, staged and scripted, PR charades designed to fool the 
watching audience into thinking that there was anyone outside of the Globalist 
coalition of the killing and their dwindling army of sycophantic cheerleaders 
that actually supported the never ending occupation of Iraq.

White House press conferences are as staged as an Arnold Schwarzenegger photo 
op, with scripted questions that are known beforehand and scripted answers.

None more so than Bush's 'humble' admission that his "bring 'em on" challenge 
wasn't exactly going to win hearts and minds in the middle east, for which the 
lapdog media are slavishly back-slapping Bush this morning.

The last time Bush was asked if he had made any mistakes at a White House press 
conference was April 13th 2004. On this occasion Bush's reaction was a national 
embarrassment to rival trying to open a locked door in China, and an insight 
into the true nature of these phony media spectacles.

Anyone who watched the TV footage witnessed the embarrassing sight of Bush 
pausing for at least five seconds and saying absolutely nothing. Bush's 
admonition that the question should have been written 'ahead of time' (like the 
rest) proves that this was an impromptu question in an otherwise carefully 
scripted briefing.

Bush's bizarre response caused waves of speculation that his answers were being 
fed through to him via an ear piece and this became a major talking point during
the Bush-Kerry election debates.

"John, I'm sure historians will look back and say, gosh, he could've done it 
better this way or that way. You know, I just -- I'm sure something will pop 
into my head here in the midst of this press conference, with all the pressure 
of trying to come up with answer, but it hadn't yet," said Bush as he puffed out
his cheeks, fumbled for words, and faltered like a deer in the headlights.

During a prime time press conference on March 6th 2003, a flustered Bush 
admitted that the event was "scripted" after a reporter interrupted him looking 
down at his notes to see which journalist to next call upon. The word 'scripted'
was later excised from numerous mainstream media transcripts of the event.

Bush's infamous staged conversation with US troops ordered to paint a rosy 
picture of conditions in Iraq was exposed when video tape of Allison Barber, 
deputy assistant defense secretary, coaching the troops on what their 
choreographed answers would be was aired.

Last night's charade was kept carefully within controlled parameters as Bush and
Blair discarded every question with the same canned response.

Blair's insistence on ducking questions about the illegality of invading Iraq by
dismissing it as past tense and harping on about how we must forget about that 
and concentrate on rebuilding the country needs to be put in its proper context.

This would be like breaking into your neighbors house, killing his wife and 
children, smashing up the place and then telling the police that the reasons and
consequences of doing all this are not important because the house is a mess and
in need of renovation.

Hailing the installation of another puppet government as a turning point, Bush 
and Blair carefully avoided questions about when troops will be withdrawn. Press
speculation that a large scale withdrawal is imminent has been heard before and 
always turns out to be baseless. The only point at which troops will be 
withdrawn is when they are needed to bludgeon another broken backed third world 
country in the name of democracy.

Blair's indignant preaching about Al-Qaeda in Iraq spoiling his Straussian 
vision of global democracy (international world government by force) was propped
up by Bush's reference to the mythical Al-Zarqawi presence and the determination
of the terrorists to succeed.

The fact is that the 'insurgents' are comprised almost entirely of Iraqis and 
half of Iraqis actually support their goals. On the other hand polls have shown 
that Bush and Blair's imperial occupation forces garner no more than 18% 

Iraqis say the country is worse than it was under Saddam and former Prime 
Minister Ayad Allawi said human rights abuses had eclipsed those of the deposed 

If Chinese troops occupied Los Angeles, bombed villages, told citizens they 
couldn't re-enter their homes without chipped ID cards, engaged in untold 
massacres, set up torture camps, took control of all free media and imprisoned 
anyone who protested their presence, would Americans who fought back be 
characterized as insurgents and terrorists?

Escaping the Matrix website
cyberjournal website  
subscribe cyberjournal list     mailto:•••@••.•••
Posting archives      
  cyberjournal forum  
  Achieving real democracy
  for readers of ETM  
  Community Empowerment
  Blogger made easy